Value creation analysis - An alternative way of Merger model

I read something about valuation creation analysis basically valuing the combined company after a merger and compare it to the original acquirer's implied value, I am a bit confused as to how this works and the mechanics, can someone tell me what is this analysis and maybe give an example and ways to calculate it?

I tried to search online but did not find anything too informative, help needed, thanks!

 
Best Response

Few ways to do this, but is essentially a way for a banker to make 1+1=3. In all of these it is important to remember that share price today is the present value of share price tomorrow, so only need to discount by cost of equity in the future. You are essentially comparing what the future share price would be assuming the same expected return on future earnings (with the value created).

  1. Capitalize synergies at estimated combined company EBITDA multiple and add to combined company enterprise value, solve for equity value.

  2. Forecast EPS and if Accretive deal and combined P/E multiple (usually weighted by ownership or market cap) to get equity value of combined company. Compare.

  3. Repeat step 2 and add in dividends compared to company A dividends after synergies and financing (or look at combined company dividend yield and divide by company yield pre deal to get new value).

The real magic here is using synergies and low cost of capital to replace more burdensome capital and assuming the market will give you credit for the difference. Don't look behind the curtain though.

 

Haven't heard of this but it sounds like you're saying that you could subtract the pre-merger value of the acquirer from the post-merger and get the value of the target.

If there were no synergies and you were literally just slapping two companies together then ya, that difference would be the value of the target but as soon as you start to add synergies then it gets messy. And there's always synergies.

 

If you combined the companies for no reason, then you have a lot of work to convince your shareholders that it was a good idea. This analysis is used to show shareholders that the deal makes the value of their investment worth more than not doing the deal. When you use the numbers, it seems like less of a wave of the hand.

 

Thank you!! George_Banker Thanks for taking the time and giving this detailed explanation, very helpful! I do have a follow up question:

I was able to extract some info on this subject from a friend of mine who is a M&A associate, he told me this formula: buyer's market cap + seller's market cap + synergies - changes in net debt. He spoke very fast on the phone and needed to get off the phone fast so I wasn't able to ask more.

I have a question: what does this change in net debt represent? And how to calculate it specifically?

Say, if buyer A's market cap is 800 m, has debt 200 m, cash 80 m, purchased the target B for 450 m (raised debt 200 m and used 50 m cash to do the deal), target B has 20 m cash, 40 m debt.

Can someone pls illustrate how to calculate the change in net debt in this scenario?? Pls excuse my numbers - I made them up just now so it's easier for everyone to illustrate with an example.

Thanks!!

 

We do this all the time in telecom especially when working with legacy LECs that want to expand their fiber network. Fiber companies typically trade at 11-12x while LECs trade at 6-8x so pretty much any transaction will be dilutive if you look at it on an EPS basis.

The value creation analysis can be done with a DCF but usually with just a multiple. For illustrative purposes, you project out what TEV would be in the standalone case by applying the current multiple to each year's EBITDA then go down to implied share price. Then you do the same thing with the pro forma company and for that you would use a blended multiple that's the pro forma TEV / combined EBITDAs plus run rate cost synergies. Apply the multiple every year and get down to implied share price. Compare the pro forma case vs the standalone and boom, illustrative value creation.

Pretty easy and straightforward, most annoying part is building out the actual operating models... if you're lucky you'll get there okay from your team to just use the company's projected financials

 

Ok thank you! I feel like not a lot of ppl on this forum know about this analysis but I appreciate your input!

I was wondering where does the formula: buyer's market cap + seller's market cap + synergies - changes in net debt come in this analysis then?

 

Earum et magni enim. Dolorem omnis molestiae dolores sit nemo animi dolores.

Quis odio et enim neque et nihil quia. Quo in et tenetur exercitationem eos non rerum sed. Ab natus occaecati sit enim enim optio. Repudiandae aut qui rerum suscipit itaque necessitatibus fugiat. Minus aliquam dolor dignissimos. Et quos vel quisquam facere.

Possimus labore maiores voluptatem et deleniti. Reiciendis reiciendis ad neque facilis numquam et nam. Laboriosam eaque ratione quos mollitia. Accusantium harum inventore quos tenetur. Et mollitia aliquam molestias velit molestiae autem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”