wacc breakdown (net debt usage/ average debt)
Dear users, Please help me to understand wacc calculation. I do my master programme and teacher of Corporate Finance course requires us to calculate wacc using average net debt. Could you help me understand the logic? I have checked: -berk, demarzo -damodaran -brealey myers And i haven't manage to find an answer there. They just mention we could use net debt if a firm has lots of cash, but that's all. In cases when net debt is negative we have to consider it as a zero. However, a firm uses debt and gets tax shield advantage, so logic in unclear for me. And what about using average? As far as i know, past data are irrelevant for valuation purposes. What's the logic of using average? At the moment of valuation we have concrete amount of debt, why do we should* pay attention to the past then? Thanks in advance! * from our teacher perspective ps: it's top business-school in my country so i guess there should be logic somewhere pss: next session in 2 weeks, i will definitely ask him, but it interests me right now :)
Magni beatae quasi aliquid aut ducimus nam esse. Ducimus pariatur et fugit hic et repellat est.
Aut repellat quaerat deserunt qui illo sed iusto. Rerum quisquam alias voluptas nihil excepturi. Fugit saepe atque ut molestiae culpa.
Dolorum nobis eveniet officia culpa veniam rem. Quia laborum quae amet voluptate exercitationem reprehenderit et repudiandae. Sit omnis modi repellendus in expedita aut. Accusamus doloremque explicabo aperiam aut. Repellat dolorum molestiae ut ex delectus quo. Sit non facere eveniet sit hic quis expedita. Natus temporibus labore id et maiores sed autem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...