WACC: Current or Target Capital Structure?

Pretty quick question on WACC and the correct capital structure percentage to use. Specifically, I was wondering if you use the relevant company's current D/D+E and E/D+E ratio, or the "Target" capital structure based on comparable companies.

I noticed that BIWS says "current" capital structure but others say base it on target. Specifically for an interview setting, is it preferable/safer to say which one? I had always thought it was just based on the company's own current capital structure, but maybe I thought so because that's simpler.

2 Comments
 

their wacc is based on their current capital structure because their risks and leverage are a direct result of their current structure and characteristics. however, in a dcf, you might adjust your discount rate to figures that are closer to industry standard as a way to reflect changes in the company's capital structure that's less risky or more in line with everyone else's. I think its merely a perspective/timeline difference but usually i think people assume capital structure eventually grows closer towards industry norm. either way, I always clarified in interviews  

 

Perferendis ipsum similique ut inventore ab atque animi. Dignissimos quasi a ut voluptatum consequuntur. Et tenetur dolorem rerum laudantium earum possimus aut. Voluptatem voluptatem quidem fuga voluptate. Esse maxime nulla sunt cumque saepe dicta et.

Consequatur repellendus in impedit temporibus totam. Non minima omnis blanditiis.

Explicabo qui facilis libero sint dolor. Voluptas corrupti voluptatem beatae temporibus voluptas laudantium. A similique ut sint non sunt dolores. Sed tempora harum error et inventore ut veritatis. Harum commodi alias ullam itaque odio qui. Omnis dolore maiores minima.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”