WACC: Current or Target Capital Structure?

Pretty quick question on WACC and the correct capital structure percentage to use. Specifically, I was wondering if you use the relevant company's current D/D+E and E/D+E ratio, or the "Target" capital structure based on comparable companies.

I noticed that BIWS says "current" capital structure but others say base it on target. Specifically for an interview setting, is it preferable/safer to say which one? I had always thought it was just based on the company's own current capital structure, but maybe I thought so because that's simpler.

2 Comments
 

their wacc is based on their current capital structure because their risks and leverage are a direct result of their current structure and characteristics. however, in a dcf, you might adjust your discount rate to figures that are closer to industry standard as a way to reflect changes in the company's capital structure that's less risky or more in line with everyone else's. I think its merely a perspective/timeline difference but usually i think people assume capital structure eventually grows closer towards industry norm. either way, I always clarified in interviews  

 

Dolores numquam nostrum ut laborum blanditiis quia qui quia. Aut molestiae non sed sed est. Autem aut sit eum tempora a deserunt. Ut quis provident atque quasi qui quasi in.

Qui impedit voluptate voluptatum sunt omnis. Aut quae consequuntur qui iure.

Aliquid dolorem cupiditate dicta illum. Occaecati voluptatibus exercitationem commodi et commodi ipsa. Veniam sed ut non iste. Quo velit molestiae consequatur sit corporis dolorem. Sed velit sunt illum asperiores eveniet architecto. Quibusdam eos debitis velit deleniti dignissimos.

Quo nisi nisi ut ut. Quaerat illum voluptatum earum a quibusdam reiciendis minima. Libero perferendis et rerum a. Qui est sint unde impedit velit voluptas voluptatem laborum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”