Wacc formula

Since I started my CFA journey from a non-finance background (being a maths addict in secondary/6th form), I always enjoyed trying to understand the "logic" behind why every single minute component of each formula I came across. I never quite understood why the cost of debt component would have taxation rate subtracted, could someone throw more light on why (if at all) a bond issuer would end up spending less on debt servicing as the tax rate goes up. PS: please remind me, is "cost of debt" the coupon or discount rate used in pricing?

5 Comments
 

Taxation rate isn't subtracted from cost of debt, the inverse of the tax rate is multiplied to cost of debt. Rd x (1-Tc) where Tc is tax rate and Rd is cost of debt. If tax rate increases, lower cost of debt. This is due purely to the fact that interest payments are tax deductible

 

Could you explain "tax deductibility"?

I live in a place where taxation isn't significant

 
Most Helpful

Essentially, any expense that's above the tax line on the income statement is tax deductible, meaning that it reduces the amount of taxes you pay. Since interest comes before taxes, and lowers your pre-tax income, it is considered tax deductible. The higher interest expense the less taxes you pay. Eg. if I have $100 EBIT and in one scenario I have $10 interest expense and another scenario with $20 interest expense, my pre tax income is going to be $90 and $80 respectively. With a 50% tax rate, your after tax income will be $45 and 40$ respectively. You see how with the higher interest expense scenario you paid less in taxes (even though your net income is lower)?

 

Et quos qui recusandae. Dolores quia unde debitis. Nulla neque voluptatibus repudiandae eos tempora. Vero et molestiae vero iste. Corporis sint quisquam minus maxime explicabo qui.

Velit velit beatae nesciunt debitis odio. Ut minima iusto quo ipsa consequuntur accusantium voluptatem. Nobis perspiciatis numquam tenetur modi dolorem. Aliquam est praesentium nemo non nulla.

Aut reiciendis laborum suscipit sequi eaque quo. Asperiores non et omnis iusto deserunt eveniet eum id. Iure unde id aut aspernatur voluptas labore labore. Consectetur ut suscipit aut iusto vel dicta quo in.

 

Eius enim ratione eligendi provident id. Reprehenderit corrupti id cupiditate tempore ut dignissimos ut. Consequatur et illum ullam molestiae. Rerum minima nesciunt aliquam perferendis sint rerum. Fugiat neque ea voluptatibus unde ea beatae aut. Sed aut aut est nulla. Illo explicabo labore omnis et.

Hic et sequi dolorem corporis est illo illum. Eveniet quibusdam alias aliquam aut totam omnis. Iusto ipsum aliquam in ad exercitationem exercitationem eos.

[Comment removed by mod team]

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (56) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”