What Google's New TOS Means to You

(disclosure: I'm long GOOG)

If you're like most (read:all) people, then you spend about as much time reading Terms of Service agreements as you do flossing your neighbor's Rottweiler's teeth. Unfortunately, companies know this and bury all kinds of unsavory things in their TOS. The biggest TOS "scandal" recently was on Instagram, where they basically came out and said that all of your photos now belong to them and that you shouldn't be surprised or alarmed when you saw a picture of yourself on an ad for hemorrhoid ointment.

Well, Google has done something similar with its newly revised TOS, it's something many of you won't like (but many others won't even care about), and fortunately Google has made it very easy to opt out of. So props to GOOG for not being creepy, even if they were trying to push this through on the sly.

What the new policy comes down to is this: Google has been collecting profile information forever, and now knows you pretty well. They also know who your friends are and who you influence. So now they're going to make you famous by plugging your profile pic (among potentially other things about you) into advertising targeted at your friends, family, and associates.

Like I said, for many of you this is no big deal. For others, it represents an invasion of privacy. And I can see both sides. I don't really care who knows about the stuff I buy, and if my mug can sell some shit and in some small way increase Google's market value, then it behooves me to play along as a shareholder. On the other hand, you probably don't want the whole world knowing that you're a connoisseur of sex dolls or something equally embarrassing (no judgment).

So if you want to opt out of the program, Google makes it pretty easy. Just make sure you're logged into your Google account and then click here:

https://plus.google.com/settings/endorsements?hl=en

Then uncheck the box labeled, "Based upon my activity, Google may show my name and profile photo in shared endorsements that appear in ads." which is checked by default. Then be sure to hit SAVE.

All things being equal, I think it will be pretty interesting to see how this plays out. I'm certainly more likely to buy something like music if it's endorsed by someone whose taste I know doesn't suck. But this is also right on the creepy line for me. I don't quite know why, but I'm also not a thousand percent behind the whole thing. I'm leaving my box checked for now, but we'll see what happens.

What do you guys think? You giving up the goods to the GOOG, or is this a straight privacy violation? Do you at least give them props for making opting out easy, even if they did try to hide it in the TOS? And is this just the wave of the future? I mean, we've all gotten used to FREE on the Internet so much so that we bitch the minute a site wants to charge us for something. These guys all have to eat, too. Is this all just fair use?

6 Comments
 

Looks like this only applies to people who use Google+. One would think that the people you can 'plus' (is it called that?) on Google+ would also have some Facebook or Twitter account which would really make Google+ not a necessity. I just don't see why people use Google+ when Google obviously has hidden motives for the service.

Nice post though.

Once I did bad and that I heard ever. Twice I did good and that I heard never.
 
Edmundo Braverman

If you have a Gmail account, you have a G+ account (whether you use it or not). Also, G+ is not Facebook or Twitter, as it's not a social network. G+ is more of a social layer on the web. Think enhanced search.

I don't think that's right, Eddie. I just clicked your link and was redirected to a screen showing my gmail and asking me if I want to join Google+ (I don't). Maybe I opted out of it before (don't really remember) but it's possible to have gmail without Google+, since I do.

 

I'd actually like to get off of Google for the most part. Does anyone use DuckDuckGo or DaveDaveFind for search? Can anyone recommend a private paid e-mail service?

 

Architecto eos voluptatem quis similique nobis deleniti aperiam omnis. Mollitia voluptates nam assumenda qui iure repudiandae autem. Ullam ut dolorem velit voluptatem.

Corporis rem quaerat praesentium ad repellat odio. Esse incidunt voluptates blanditiis aut saepe dolor minima sunt.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”