What should I take?

London-based.

Got an offer from one of the big 3 (GS/MS/JP) and a boutique (PJT/PWP) for the full time analyst role. Curious to hear what to choose and why to maximise exits to L/S HF, Distressed Debt Investing and MF PE.

Would appreciate any insights into the culture at each firm, junior comp and exits.

4 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here's what you need to know about choosing between a London-based offer from one of the big 3 (GS/MS/JP) and a boutique (PJT/PWP) for a full-time analyst role, especially if you're aiming to maximize exits to L/S HF, Distressed Debt Investing, and MF PE:

Culture Insights:

  • Big 3 (GS/MS/JP):

    • Goldman Sachs (GS): Known for a high-intensity environment with a strong focus on performance and market share. The culture can be demanding, but it offers significant learning opportunities and exposure to high-profile deals.
    • Morgan Stanley (MS): Similar to GS, MS has a competitive and high-pressure environment. However, it is also known for a slightly more collegial atmosphere compared to GS.
    • J.P. Morgan (JP): The culture at JP can vary widely across groups. Some groups are known for being scrappy and expecting juniors to contribute beyond just churning pages. Seniors are focused on winning market share, which can lead to long weeks.
  • Boutiques (PJT/PWP):

    • PJT Partners (PJT): Generally known for a more collaborative and supportive environment. The smaller size can lead to more direct mentorship and a closer-knit team.
    • Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP): Similar to PJT, PWP offers a more intimate working environment with potentially better work-life balance compared to the big 3. The culture is often described as collegial and supportive.

Junior Compensation:

  • Big 3 (GS/MS/JP): Typically offer competitive compensation packages that are in line with industry standards for large investment banks. This includes a base salary, performance bonuses, and other benefits.
  • Boutiques (PJT/PWP): Compensation at top boutiques can be very competitive and sometimes even higher than at the big 3, especially when considering bonuses. The smaller team size can also mean more significant individual contributions are recognized and rewarded.

Exit Opportunities:

  • Big 3 (GS/MS/JP):

    • Goldman Sachs (GS): Strong brand name and extensive alumni network can open doors to top L/S HF, Distressed Debt Investing, and MF PE roles.
    • Morgan Stanley (MS): Similar to GS, MS has a strong reputation and network that can facilitate exits to prestigious buy-side roles.
    • J.P. Morgan (JP): Offers robust exit opportunities due to its strong market presence and reputation. The experience gained here is highly valued by buy-side firms.
  • Boutiques (PJT/PWP):

    • PJT Partners (PJT): Known for strong exits to buy-side roles, particularly in restructuring and advisory, which are highly relevant for Distressed Debt Investing.
    • Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP): Also offers excellent exit opportunities, with a strong track record of placing analysts into top L/S HF and PE roles.

Conclusion:

  • If you prioritize a strong brand name and extensive network for exits, one of the big 3 (GS/MS/JP) might be the better choice.
  • If you value a more supportive and collaborative culture with potentially competitive compensation and strong exit opportunities, a boutique like PJT or PWP could be more suitable.

Ultimately, the decision should align with your personal preferences for work environment and long-term career goals.

Sources: Banks with best cultures, Bain Capital PE vs PJT RSSG, IB SA No Offer -> Major Entertainment Strategy + Perspectives on Recovering from Failure, Advice for London applicants, BB vs EB in London

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

Repudiandae est quia et. Repellat laudantium vel doloremque neque fuga voluptatem.

Optio consequatur eligendi in optio. Id tempora et corrupti rem. Accusamus ipsa tempore dolores et quidem a. Rem et omnis unde nihil. Necessitatibus voluptatibus excepturi repellendus reprehenderit. Qui ipsum non eos veritatis explicabo. Qui voluptas ea aspernatur sequi excepturi distinctio quo.

Sed reiciendis maiores soluta. Veritatis quidem qui eos in illo et modi et. Rerum amet molestiae reprehenderit laboriosam id reiciendis dolor. Quia sed voluptatibus praesentium aperiam quis consequuntur qui.

Ipsam repellendus consequuntur placeat veniam libero. Tempore atque saepe repellendus aliquid non eum. Et qui dolorem dolore eius et dignissimos sed. Fuga quia ut magni vel qui temporibus. Ipsa ab atque id velit et cum. Culpa voluptatem minima quia cupiditate nobis rem. Incidunt sit dolores sit quis dolorum vel dolorum rerum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.9%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”