With Evercore m&a hiring 60+ analysts, I have a hard time believing the exits are top-tier or that it's super exclusive. I mean, this is nearly as many banking analysts as BBs (and many are from no-name schools?)
| +434 | Is UBS really that bad? | 77 | 12h |
| +265 | Investment Banking is Divine | 40 | 2d |
| +221 | Another $115bn Mega deal for these banks. Congrats! | 46 | 18h |
| +216 | US 2027 SA IB worried about background check | 53 | 2d |
| +77 | Useless associates | 15 | 2h |
| +77 | Which Offer to Accept: UBS Analyst Role or Part Time Cashier at the Local Taco Bell | 20 | 38m |
| +61 | Roku-Fox Deal - UBS Misses Out on yet another deals after years chasing this deal | 10 | 6h |
| +52 | Differences in Restructuring Teams? | 24 | 14h |
| +46 | FIG Pigeonholes you - is it true? | 18 | 32m |
| +41 | Is Houston SA 28 recruiting already over? | 34 | 2d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
Evercore is huge. They have more M&A bankers than most BBs and are growing capital markets. It’s a great firm but there’s nothing boutique about them
Then what's so coveted about it if there are infinite seats essentially?
If that is the logic you are going with then some random shop that hires an analyst every 2 years is more coveted than Blackstone. Its coveted because of the brand, pay, dealflow and analyst experience. How it plays out in reality might be different but they are the reason why EVR M&A is coveted.
The Evercore slander lately about their big class has been crazy, exits are still top notch because having a big analyst class isn’t always equal to worse exits. Also, there are some really strong groups (e.g. TMT) have better exits than others, but the majority of evercore analysts will get UMM/MF looks.
At the end of the day it depends on individual performance in the interviews since most analysts at top BB/EB will get inbounds from the best funds, it just happens that most people who opt for Evercore instead of GS/MS are hardos who know they want to exit to PE before they start in IB
-
all m&a?
-
yeah, and GS TMT is full of non target DEI beckie’s, what’s your point?
Can we not fathom that EVR clearly sees themselves as a competitor to the JPM/GS’s of the world and are moving accordingly?
Yes they are that good. Yes they are growing fast without compromising on average talent. Just because you didn’t get in to their “massive” class doesn’t mean the class isn’t highly vetted and talented.
Not true and using your "Works at GS" flair isn't going to convince anyone except college prospects.
Thanks “jewslayer1944”, I take your retort very seriously.
WSO tends to over-index on prestige, and part of that is the appeal of belonging to a small in-group that rejects most applicants. EVR M&A will still provide access to the same top-end opportunities it always has, and it's up to the individual to convert. What changes over time is the average outcome, simply because of math.
There’s a structural mismatch between the number of analysts coming out of top groups and the number of UMM/MF seats that the forum collectively chases. As analyst classes expand, the average exit naturally drifts toward MM, not because the group got worse, but because the denominator increased.
To put rough numbers on it: MS/GS/JPM each have 100+ analysts per class (can confirm GS at least is closer to 150 a year than 100 for classic/coverage spots), and the top boutiques collectively add even more people. That’s before counting RX or top-bucket analysts at the other BB/EB's. Meanwhile, there are only a few dozen true UMM/MF buyout platforms (i.e. no zombie funds), most hiring 3–8 associates per year on average (outside of the outliers like CD&R hiring 15+). Even if top groups continue placing extremely well at the margin, the median outcome has to normalize.
Someone got rejected from EVR lol
Lmao you've got it wrong. The bigger class size just means less elite exits for others, not Evercore.
Tell me you haven’t gone through PE recruiting without telling me you haven’t gone through PE recruiting. Everyone competes in the same pool. The top analyst at almost any strong platform will beat a middle-of-the-pack analyst at EVR. That’s just how competitive markets work. All EVR provides you, same as GS/MS/JPM, is relatively more at-bats than non top BB/EB's.
Good to know. thanks.
Being at Evercore will get u more looks from MFs, but it's just one factor. Then comes the group (like TMT), then the school you go to, then your gpa/sat score, then the actual interview, and then networking, possibly as well.
If u went to Wharton + another EB like Moelis, were Summa + PBK w/ 1550 SAT score, elite modeling skills and strong network, you will beat the Purdue kid who is at Evercore.
Coming from someone who did their summer at Evercore and returning FT.
Really appreciate it and makes sense. If from a target and have solid interest, is it really that competitive to get MF or is the vibe whoever wants it gets it?
def really competitive, but also depends on the firm. Some are easy to get but you can't rlly optimize for one specific outcome (like BCP or H&F), though there are pipelines like PJT RSSG -> Apollo, MS M&A -> KKR, EVR -> Advent/TPG
here we go again...
https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/seeing-evercor…
how bad did you want to work at EVR to be so obsessed with the firm? You should be proud of BMO man...
zip up my pants for me wont you intern, your girlfriend just finished doing her thing.
at a MF (top one - APO/H&F) but was in a way better place than the slums of EVR bud
They are hiring more Americans because they stopped hiring the maple munchers and are now more conservative with handing out visas to intls.
This strategy will work as long as the larger headcount does not dilute the quality of the fleet. If it does… BofA 2.0
Do u think it will?
Which teams are hiring? Or is this more of a strategy announcement that they'll pick up recruiting soon?
just observations from SA numbers
Sure, that’s a large class, but other banks hire at similar or even larger scales. For example, BofA brings on 30+ analysts in NYC M&A alone each year—and that’s just one product group. C&R might hire another ~20, NET another ~20, etc. So while 60 sounds huge in isolation, it’s not outsized relative to the volume of work they do
yeah but BofA is known to be bloated...
at my M7 business school EVR NYC only hired diversity & women
It's predominantly White & Asian at my M7
Autem voluptas quod quia eos. Repudiandae voluptas et natus. Consequatur atque vel omnis libero illo nihil qui ipsam. Natus voluptatem unde aliquam incidunt nisi nam temporibus.
Quis provident at non. Ipsa officiis aut numquam distinctio qui aperiam officiis. Numquam quasi esse vel et. Cupiditate sunt consectetur molestias est et itaque dolorum.
Alias et voluptatem molestiae. Iusto qui veritatis voluptatem tempora sed enim. Enim sed est nihil molestias aut distinctio. Nihil ab non velit.
Laborum quo quam vel sed. Laborum ipsum consequatur amet sapiente voluptatem consequuntur aperiam. Voluptatem id sed voluptatem explicabo qui quod autem.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Repudiandae perspiciatis dolorem omnis iste porro. Ut corrupti voluptatum ex vero distinctio modi voluptatem. Modi vero saepe sequi rerum et dicta sit.
Consequatur quae exercitationem voluptatibus sint exercitationem qui. Hic et quibusdam est iure. Molestias nobis officiis accusamus porro ad. Ab distinctio sed delectus aut cupiditate ut nihil eius. Et animi iusto ea repellat aliquid non assumenda culpa. Nulla exercitationem nam ab ut qui animi.