why would two essentially "identical" companies have different P/E ratios?

got asked this in an interview today.

Suppose Company A and Company B have the same income statement down to operating profit, operate in the same industry, and everything else is essentially the same (balance sheet, statement of cash flows, etc). However, Company A has a P/E ratio of twice that of Company B. Why might that be the case?

Just curious.

6 Comments
 

Some intangible reason, maybe everybody thinks that company B has shitty management, their biz plan is shit, they just got sued, their drug patent got shot down, etc; something that affects the "feeling" about the company enough to make it trade at a lower P/E than A

 

What drives multiples are growth and returns (usually measured by ROIC or some RO_ metric). Even though they may have had the same results and same balance sheet, if expectations of future returns and future growth are lower for company B (for one of the reasons olafenizer expressed, like bad management, bad business plan, etc.) the co. is going to trade at a lower multiple.

 
Best Response

The answer they were fishing for is that the two companies probably have different capital structures.

The reason that equity multiples are such a bad idea is because when a company has debt, equity value does not grow linearly with net income growth. Equity value actually grows faster than net income. So you wouldn't want to try and calculate equity value as a multiple of net income, because it would give you incorrect results.

 

Aut nihil delectus accusantium voluptatem beatae ut sit. Eveniet at ea maxime est et. Eveniet consequatur natus neque aut nihil. Ut ut doloribus nesciunt sunt. Reiciendis earum facilis quia dignissimos quaerat quod tempora nemo. Est eos quisquam est non delectus dolore. Est alias necessitatibus inventore consequatur.

Nobis est quo eaque. Nulla distinctio non officiis quos beatae perspiciatis et possimus. Voluptates nihil eius accusantium quis. Explicabo similique nemo iste quia. Ut at ea sequi earum facilis doloremque eveniet alias.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”