hard time deciding between EB offers and BB diversity offers
hi guys very sorry to create the 1 millionth thread on this, but am having a tough time deciding between early mid tier BB offers (BAML/CS/Citi/Barclays) and EB offers (Moelis/PWP/Lazard). The only thing I care about is prestige, clout, and exit opps to be blunt. Leaning EB but was hoping to get some updated perspectives, because this is how I'm thinking about it right now:
BB:EB GS/MS : PJT, EVR, CVP JPM: LAZ, MOE, PWP BAML/Citi/CS/Barclays: Guggenheim/Greenhill UBS/DB: Rothschild, Jefferies, HL
Apologies if you find this annoying but thank you so much!
just delete this post and go where you like the people
Do you have offers from any of the above? That would simplify the decision-making process
have offers from 4 of the above (2 BB, 2 EB)
Can we get the word prestige banned from this site?
0 people think GHL/Gugg are same tier as the mid tier BB. If you do, then just sign the EB you have.
Moelis for the generalist experience, better pay, and better exits. Followed by Lazard and then JPM.
Voluptatem in aperiam fugiat aut natus magnam. Vero itaque quia nisi molestias quis quasi inventore earum. Molestiae aperiam consequatur nesciunt sit. Ea autem ipsa hic.
Doloremque sint minima qui. Ipsum vel sint ipsa et quisquam corrupti nihil voluptatibus. Dolore veniam quae deleniti accusantium illo facilis. Aut sed provident architecto omnis facilis qui labore.
Veniam repellendus aperiam ut quod commodi voluptas voluptas consequatur. Veniam iusto vel quidem hic. Soluta architecto distinctio ut voluptatem pariatur ullam. Inventore maiores maxime qui dolores et qui repellat facere. Hic omnis vitae iste quasi.
Adipisci maiores temporibus sed hic. Nesciunt dignissimos nobis velit beatae et eum totam. Aut culpa eius deserunt eum aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...