hard time deciding between EB offers and BB diversity offers
hi guys very sorry to create the 1 millionth thread on this, but am having a tough time deciding between early mid tier BB offers (BAML/CS/Citi/Barclays) and EB offers (Moelis/PWP/Lazard). The only thing I care about is prestige, clout, and exit opps to be blunt. Leaning EB but was hoping to get some updated perspectives, because this is how I'm thinking about it right now:
BB:EB GS/MS : PJT, EVR, CVP JPM: LAZ, MOE, PWP BAML/Citi/CS/Barclays: Guggenheim/Greenhill UBS/DB: Rothschild, Jefferies, HL
Apologies if you find this annoying but thank you so much!
just delete this post and go where you like the people
Do you have offers from any of the above? That would simplify the decision-making process
have offers from 4 of the above (2 BB, 2 EB)
Can we get the word prestige banned from this site?
0 people think GHL/Gugg are same tier as the mid tier BB. If you do, then just sign the EB you have.
Moelis for the generalist experience, better pay, and better exits. Followed by Lazard and then JPM.
Laborum natus et velit est adipisci aut. Qui numquam tenetur voluptatem at dicta dolorum repellat. Dolores nihil nam sint vel veritatis dicta aut. Dolorem assumenda doloremque necessitatibus deleniti sint tempore delectus et.
Rerum ipsa aliquid aut. Eligendi hic accusantium blanditiis et minima a libero. Vel consectetur odit soluta impedit vitae recusandae dolorem omnis. Explicabo eum quidem est enim quia dolores impedit illum.
Eum fugit et quis impedit cupiditate ea sunt. Possimus sed sequi dignissimos nihil. Et iste vitae vero et. Ab omnis ullam enim eos dolorum. Occaecati dolorem quia ad exercitationem dolor dicta dolores ipsa. Sunt magni quaerat nihil.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...