I’m Conservative, but might vote for Carney.

I have centred/right beliefs but how can I vote for a shitty career politician over Goldman/BoC/BoE/Brookfield holy smokes. Does prestige outweigh party affiliation??

24 Comments
 

Best part was Pierre Poiliever saying he was more equipped to handle Trump, tariffs, and global economy and opposed to the man ran both the BoC and BoE

 
Controversial

The only thing Canadians should be focused on is immediately stopping the massive immigration mess they have going on.  If they do not VERY QUICKLY the country WILL turn into India 2.0.  Walk around Brampton most of Ontario (its already happened).

Look, I have nothing against an indian person, but comparing Canada to India....there's a reason people prefer living in Canada (for now).  Soon they will be the same country.

 

Solving mass immigration is a pretty tough sell when you've neutered your domestic economy and relied on cheap talent to fill whatever shortages.

They can either lower immigration immediately and deal with the economic fallout (Trump isn't helping this) or rely on immigration as they try to fix it.

Honestly, joining the EU with an exemption to the Schengen might be the move. Can get the migration they need from France or something, assuming they prioritise the citizens and not the refugees.

 

I know this is probably a troll but this pretty accurately reflects the sentiment here, and is a case study for why Canada deserves every single thing that's happening to it.

 

I think bar the ultra-green initiative (there's a fine line between pragmatic realism and doing, 'hey lets shut down massive industries because of net-zero by 2050 and fuck up entire communities dependent on gas') he'd be a centre-right liberal-tory in the UK. The key for centrists in this day to beat populism is 1) deliver on economy and 2) deliver on immigration (ie cut it to sensible levels & prioritise high-skilled) and 3) don't dive too further left on culture war issues (to be socially liberal is fine and one thing, going down the route of some US democrats isnt). I am impressed so far with him however

 

Delivering on the economy is key, heads and bounds about everything else. There are long term structural issues with the Canadian economy that go beyond immigration, housing and the carbon tax.

There is a big voting block that have the economy as their #1 concern, would have held their nose and voted Pierre for change and rightfully so. It's hard for that bloc now to not be enticed by someone who's entire background and credentials are aligned to their priority - the economy.

It doesn't help that Pierre is extremely unlikeable and his "I am not Trudeau" playbook fell apart the minute JT stepped down. Does not help his image with Canadians that his chief of staff is MAGA, it's really elbows up.

Think Mark could have sent a really strong signal to the bloc above by shifting Wilkinson off the Natural Resources portfolio but he chose not to. Kind of a strange move. Def going to cost him votes.

Either way, this is going to be a nailbiter and a fun watch for those of us who enjoy geopolitics as observers and not like a team sport.

 

Would someone explain the difference to me between the two parties at present? After hearing Carney discuss the Ring of Fire, removing barriers to infrastructure, removing the carbon tax, not increasing capital gains, HST exception for home buyers, slowing immigration, they have similar platforms. I don’t care that Pierre said them first.

The big difference is the candidate. I have hated the liberal party for years, but if Carney proves he can clean house, utilize natural resources domestically, and not increase immigration I am willing to hear him out given his track record as an individual.

Conversely, Pierre needs to differentiate. If he actually addresses issues like immigration properly he will win. His campaign of painting Carney as the owner of Brookfield makes zero sense. Even on him being a ‘green fanatic’ he was talking his book as a PM - I can’t fault that.

I genuinely welcome discourse on why I am wrong and these parties are extremely different.

 

Even if Carney was a prophet, the skies opened up and he got God's endorsement I would not vote for him because he's still surrounded by the same people as Trudeau. Sure he has an impressive resume but the party and its values are fundamentally the same. 

They are making some big promises but they always do. Remember how hard Trudeau was pushing to eliminate first past the post? Never heard about it again after 2015.  I cannot believe for a second that a man who has been pushing for degrowth via carbon taxes to the point he wrote a book about it abandoned those ideas.  East-West pipeline? He appointed Guilbeault, one of the most radical environmentalists in Canada as Quebec lieutenant, a province which is already deeply opposed to such projects, there will be no pipeline. 

The election should be a referendum on the last 9 years of disastrous policy and scandal versus Polievre's platform (which is clearly quite good because Carney is copying it). Again he is a very accomplished man, but that does not necessarily make him fit for the job and we still need to contend with the people around him that will be enabled. 

 

This post is emblematic of why Canada is absolutely screwed. 10 years of the worst administration in Canadian history and the Canadian electorate is clamouring for more.

I hope you continue to enjoy the non-stop, unfettered mass immigration alongside trying to buy a decent house, which costs C$2-3MM, with a marginal tax rate of 53.5% that kicks in at 225k.

Canadians (myself included) GTFO to greener pastures while you still can.

“Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.”
- H.L. Mencken

 

Conservatives in the UK spent 14 years campaigning while in power on immigration and woke shit. They destroyed the country’s economy entirely and still have nothing to offer but anti woke stuff. Pierre would’ve been exactly the same. 

 

Canadian politics are so bad that its not about picking a winner its about damage control. Sure past performance is no indicator of future results, but golden boy aside the last 9 years of Liberal governance (or lack there of) speak for themselves.  
 

 

Right wing politicians in Canada in Europe don’t have any strategies or ideas or competent people. Take a good look at right wing parties there - it’s nothing except copying trump’s populism and being anti woke while offering absolutely nothing different. Nothing at all. 

Conservatives don’t have a chance. It’s not just that Pierre sounds like a moron by not really providing much to his campaign, but he kinda shot himself in the foot with his media appearances on American right wing networks like the daily wire. These interviews focused so incessantly on making him appear like the Canadian trump and he should’ve known that brand of populism isn’t popular outside the US. No one wants to be liberated from the pronoun oppression outside of Montana maybe. Just focus on providing an alternative to make people’s lives less expensive. It’s not hard. He’s left completely embarrassed and isolated as the same hard right groups he sucked off are laughing at making Canada the 51st state. Right wing populism has peaked in Canada after this. If you look at any polling data you’ll see liberals numbers rising after this stunt from trump. 
 

This should’ve been the easiest elections for conservatives in a long time. They’re facing off a very strong guy, sure, but they just wasted their chance by their choices. Could’ve kept all the attention on countering Trudeau’s miserable economic policies, explaining in detail how they’ll realistically make things better, but instead they chose owning the libs as a strategy. They deserve to lose. 

 

 

Excepturi quia adipisci qui voluptas provident consequuntur et. Nesciunt nobis sunt omnis aliquam. Optio aut esse libero necessitatibus. Tenetur earum facilis molestiae reiciendis. Et nesciunt dolores dolorum sapiente enim sint doloremque debitis. Facere consequuntur placeat et harum cum natus aliquam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.3%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (78) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (72) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”