Interview Question - Higher cost of capital?

Got the following question. You have company X, very stable and has been around for a long time, and you have company Y, a startup. Which company has the higher cost of capital?

I'm curious whether I got this one right.

Thanks!

15 Comments
 

I say X b/c they are not as borrowing as much in terms of monetary amount in terms of commercial paper

in terms of interest I say small businesses bc all i hear is banks are not lending

 

Company Y is going to have a higher cost of capital primarily because it does not have a credit history and therefore likely can't access the credit markets to the same extent (and at the same prices) at which Company X can. Without knowing anything about industry focus, etc, I would assume the cost of equity is the same for each Company, though you could make an argument that Company X being "stable" would lead to a lower Beta and therefore a lower cost of equity as well.

 
Best Response

Y has the higher cost of capital - you're asking about cost of capital right? not about freakin' commercial paper like the first poster said...I am amazed by comments like these....

For cost of capital, you could probably use the WACC for each company. The proven company that has stable cash flows will have a good credit rating and be able to take debt out at a low price. On the equity side, the stable company's Ke could be computed by the CAPM - I'd imagine the beta is lower than a start-up...depends on the industry though but if its a stable company and its stock is more stable than the other company, the beta is probably lower.

For the start-up, the cost of equity is higher if its beta is higher - which it may be (this is a broad assumption though and depends on its industry, whether its private/public, etc.)....but for cost of debt, I mean banks or lenders will charge a higher amount because it isn't as credit-worthy....

So, the stable company has a lower WACC

 
MittRomneyY has the higher cost of capital - you're asking about cost of capital right? not about freakin' commercial paper like the first poster said...I am amazed by comments like these....

For cost of capital, you could probably use the WACC for each company. The proven company that has stable cash flows will have a good credit rating and be able to take debt out at a low price. On the equity side, the stable company's Ke could be computed by the CAPM - I'd imagine the beta is lower than a start-up...depends on the industry though but if its a stable company and its stock is more stable than the other company, the beta is probably lower.

For the start-up, the cost of equity is higher if its beta is higher - which it may be (this is a broad assumption though and depends on its industry, whether its private/public, etc.)....but for cost of debt, I mean banks or lenders will charge a higher amount because it isn't as credit-worthy....

So, the stable company has a lower WACC

beta? How do you know the companies are publicly traded? b/c just STARTED companies issue stock first thing right?

 
MittRomneyY has the higher cost of capital - you're asking about cost of capital right? not about freakin' commercial paper like the first poster said...I am amazed by comments like these....

For cost of capital, you could probably use the WACC for each company. The proven company that has stable cash flows will have a good credit rating and be able to take debt out at a low price. On the equity side, the stable company's Ke could be computed by the CAPM - I'd imagine the beta is lower than a start-up...depends on the industry though but if its a stable company and its stock is more stable than the other company, the beta is probably lower.

For the start-up, the cost of equity is higher if its beta is higher - which it may be (this is a broad assumption though and depends on its industry, whether its private/public, etc.)....but for cost of debt, I mean banks or lenders will charge a higher amount because it isn't as credit-worthy....

So, the stable company has a lower WACC

also obama recently passed a small buisness bill

"The small-business bill signed into law by President Barack Obama Monday eliminates capital-gains tax for investors who put money into qualifying startups." - http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/stories/2010/09/27/daily11.html

How about you stay up to date on laws while you are in your cubical cruching numbers for 90 hours a weak d bag

 
pikachu
MittRomneyY has the higher cost of capital - you're asking about cost of capital right? not about freakin' commercial paper like the first poster said...I am amazed by comments like these....

For cost of capital, you could probably use the WACC for each company. The proven company that has stable cash flows will have a good credit rating and be able to take debt out at a low price. On the equity side, the stable company's Ke could be computed by the CAPM - I'd imagine the beta is lower than a start-up...depends on the industry though but if its a stable company and its stock is more stable than the other company, the beta is probably lower.

For the start-up, the cost of equity is higher if its beta is higher - which it may be (this is a broad assumption though and depends on its industry, whether its private/public, etc.)....but for cost of debt, I mean banks or lenders will charge a higher amount because it isn't as credit-worthy....

So, the stable company has a lower WACC

also obama recently passed a small buisness bill

"The small-business bill signed into law by President Barack Obama Monday eliminates capital-gains tax for investors who put money into qualifying startups." - http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/stories/2010/09/27/daily11.html

How about you stay up to date on laws while you are in your cubical cruching numbers for 90 hours a weak d bag

Why are you on this forum if your going to talk shit on an analyst? And to your previous smartass reply, regardless of if the company is publicly traded or not you can derive beta by looking at public comps, unlevering their betas, finding the median, and relever using the company in questions debt and equity. And regardless of the capital gains tax they are going to still have a higher interest rate on their debt since they do not have stable cash flows resulting in a higher WACC.

 

i agree that normally and about 99.9999% of time yes the new company would but the fact is you can't jump to conclusions with this limited information i mean why ask such an easy question in a job interview?

 

thats true, good point...you should probably probe and ask a few more questions to get more characteristics of the companies...probing questions are a good place to start with questions like these that are vague...

 

Neque qui ad voluptate molestias. Placeat aut inventore aperiam dolores. Distinctio amet id aut et. Dolorum molestiae officia assumenda repellat repellat.

Dolore sapiente voluptatem rem molestiae ducimus et magni. Labore cupiditate quia sed cupiditate. Consequatur harum beatae ab voluptas. Nesciunt ipsum voluptas et dicta magnam quo consequuntur. Eius tempora consectetur placeat animi laboriosam.

Et vitae cum laudantium consequuntur quaerat libero id. Ut qui consequuntur blanditiis distinctio ut rerum dicta autem. Recusandae culpa est nihil alias voluptas. Molestiae nesciunt voluptatem ea quis aut molestiae neque. Ratione debitis ipsa voluptas magni saepe mollitia mollitia.

Dolore ut dolores id qui suscipit qui. Et eos et ut dolores nobis minima. Accusantium reiciendis eum voluptas eum et alias autem. Vitae fuga alias quos ullam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 03 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (53) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (15) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”