Structured Finance/credit VS CRE lending
Which route would be preferable in the long term? I have the opportunity to transition to a boutique CRE lending role, where the firm manages commingled funds from institutional investors, including a sovereign wealth fund. While CRE has been underperforming recently, it may have reached its bottom, whereas structured finance has been thriving but could now be at its peak.
The timing of such a move is a key consideration. I find the work in CRE lending more engaging, as it involves financial modelling, which I prefer, whereas structured finance is more document-heavy. Furthermore, compensation at the boutique CRE firm is higher, reflecting its smaller, more specialised nature. The boutique has been underperforming in line with the rest of the market while the firm where I am has been doing really well. Would this transition be well-timed given the current market context?
Many thanks.
Bump
I guess that's going to be one for the BOT. WSO is reallu not what it used to be..
Not even the bot has reached out 😂
Anyone out there please??
Mate this is a superb question posted in the wrong forum. Your best bets are the RE and Credit forums, in that order.
Qui rerum recusandae cupiditate a. Veniam alias qui ratione officia eligendi. Enim veritatis consequatur nesciunt tempora officiis. Totam saepe atque qui distinctio similique quibusdam. Ipsa possimus at quam. Expedita asperiores officiis nisi ratione qui.
Sit quidem et consequatur quia et modi aut. Consequatur aut consequatur consectetur rerum aliquid cumque. Repellat labore occaecati deserunt laudantium quia. Aliquam dolore nobis porro. Error repudiandae est ut veritatis ipsa et.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...