What do you think of Barbara Corcoran's hiring ideology?

Barbara Corcoran, one of the judges of ABC's Shark Tank, believes that persistence and hard work trump an impressive resume. When she's hiring, she looks for people who have the right attitude instead of the right resume. She, herself, was not a great student growing up and had to work her way up from low-paying jobs. Now, she looks for people who embody the same determination and persistence.

What do you think of Corcoran's ideology? Is it a little bit too idealistic? Or does this offer legitimate hope for those who may not have as impressive a resume?

5 Comments
 

One could argue that getting the "right resume" does involve a lot of persistence, hard work and having a good attitude. The reason most people who go to top schools, top companies etc. and have the right resume is because they possess exactly those characteristics.

That being said, there is obviously a lot of merit in judging people qualitatively as opposed to just ticking boxes which a lot of people on WSO seem to like doing (eg. Target > BB > M7 MBA > MF PE)

 

Easiest way to signal the right attitude quickly is through a resume. Interviews, even if they last a whole day, don't lend enough insight into an person's level of persistence and determination.

Gimme the loot
 
Best Response

On the surface, I agree that it's important to look beyond brand names on a resume and see what people are really like. However, once I think more about her statement, I realize that to get to the personality evaluation stage (e.g., a phone or face-to-face interview), she'd need to filter candidates by their resume. And here, the kid who worked at Burger King for 2 summers and has a 2.8-3.0 GPA (low-paying job, not a great student like Barbara) probably has a resume like this:

http://41.media.tumblr.com/d718732e20b9946b9f3051c7ae838fc5/tumblr_msoi…</a" alt="resume" /> Given the number of job applicants even a random posting gets, there's no time to interview everyone because there's a small chance that they have the potential to be great even if their resume is like the one above. Even if our aforementioned Burger King worker is the hardest-working guy on the planet, he probably won't even get to meet Barbara for an interview from his resume alone, unless he networks with her before the interview stage. In that case, I think that her ideology favors kids who can hustle and get in front of her with their personality first, through a good networking call or email (honestly, how many people would actually email her for such a thing and NOT chicken out before hitting "send"?). From there, the resume becomes a secondary consideration if the person is impressive to her in other ways.

Of course, if we're assuming that she's looking at candidates purely from resume drops, then, like another poster said, it's very easy to fake being a hard-worker (or whatever trait you want to portray) once you get an interview. Plus, the kids who would get interviews in this scenario probably had solid resumes to begin with.

 

Ut asperiores doloribus magnam molestiae. Omnis omnis magni quaerat sit in eum. Aut ut officiis iure nihil qui. Aut fugit ratione enim. Ullam in quam quas ab id velit repellendus. Esse alias temporibus consequatur. Voluptas ducimus pariatur rerum quia. Molestiae sunt voluptas nam aut omnis autem adipisci voluptas.

Nostrum quos omnis recusandae et recusandae. Asperiores quam laborum saepe accusamus.

**How is my grammar? Drop me a note with any errors you see!**

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.3%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.7%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan No 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (15) $434
  • Associates (44) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (79) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”