Archegos Capital Collapse - What's stopping traders/investors from buying stocks that are sold on fire sale?
Billions of dollars of Archegos's positions sold in 2 weeks on fire sale, dropping X% from 23-Mar to 01-Apr:
IQIYI (Ticker: IQ): -42.4% [$28.91 to $16.64]
Tencent Music (Ticker: TME): -36.7% [$31.79 to $20.11]
ViacomCBS (Ticker: VIAC): -51.1% [$91.25 to $44.64]
GSX Techedu (Ticker: GSX): -56.2% [$73.44 to $32.18]
Discovery Communications (Ticker: DISCA): -39.6% [$71.68 to $43.31]
Vipshop (Ticker: VIPS): -33.9% [$45.58 to $30.14]
Thoughts? Why aren't traders/investors buying those positions? Or are the shares purchased by Bill Hwang (ex-star in Tiger) that bad?
I thought the same thing, maybe investors were expecting more block sales? Most of those stocks were pretty frothy so maybe that is why but I still expected them to revert to their means or close to them.
those stocks only went up because Archegos was buying them..the high prices were ludicrous, and now the market knows why...they didn't deserve the high prices...they were artificial.
Yeah this is the exact reason. Since when do so-called "value" stocks like Viacom increase 700% in a year? Similar to how Soft Bank was behind the tech rally in the middle of last year, these prices were completely inflated due to Hwang constantly driving them up. Viacom does not deserve to be trading at 91. However, there could still be an opportunity to buy the dip if you believe its true value to be ~60. Just be careful, because there's a very good chance these could be complete value traps, or even worse, falling knives if we do see more chop or even a correction.
I see.. It's insane to see how a AUM$10b hedge fund can cause a doubling of share price in that many $10b++ firms. Is that the business model? That is:
Step 1: Leverage your AUM several times
Step 2: "Invest" in several companies that are of the size where you can effectively double the share price
Step 3: Slowly sell your shares to other market participants at the inflated prices
Step 4: Rinse & Repeat
-> Is the above even viable as a business model?
I'd be interested to see how the above companies' share prices pan out though - the companies' valuations look rather decent (at least in comparison with their competitors), and their business models remains fully intact despite the sell-off.
Maiores quaerat qui qui quam illo. Aut molestias esse id consequatur voluptas doloremque. Aspernatur impedit sunt distinctio non ut quibusdam. Quos vitae magni maxime in nam temporibus non. Adipisci voluptatem ratione excepturi maiores voluptate pariatur. Nam nemo tenetur quis aut illum.
Non sit et odio dolores quam. Voluptatum similique vero est cupiditate eligendi ea. Et ea beatae ut et totam.
Non fugiat accusantium velit voluptates commodi cupiditate tempore molestias. Nihil et eaque vero repudiandae. Amet pariatur ut voluptas aliquid quia quibusdam provident. Atque ab voluptatem consequatur quibusdam voluptatibus aut facere illo. A doloremque voluptatum error vel mollitia quas.
Qui voluptate aspernatur soluta possimus voluptates eligendi delectus. Ut ducimus nam sint rerum dolorem. Incidunt nulla sint officia saepe dolore porro et. Asperiores autem laboriosam eaque alias eos fugiat et distinctio.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...