Biometric Staffing?

Hey everyone, Current staffer here - have been thinking about this recently and just wanted to gather some opinions / get some feedback.

I can’t count the number of times I’ve had an analyst push back on a staffing because they were “at capacity”. While I can understand that some analysts are stretched a bit thin, I don’t believe that all analysts can possibly not be able to take on more staffings.

A solution I’ve thought of is bringing biometrics into play to standardise everything and remove dishonesty:

Every analyst on the team has to wear a Whoop (paid for by the firm) which is able to monitor their stress levels and generate a standardised output/metric. They would have to wear it constantly, and submit a weekly report of how their stress levels have been tracking. It’s pretty easy to tell if they’ve tried to tamper with their metrics, so that would also be taken into account.

If we as staffers target a standardized stress level across each analyst, then we would be able to staff much more efficiently. For example, if one analyst is able to sustain a lower stress level with less sleep, then they would be able to take on more staffings. While I understand they would be sleeping less, we would staff them up until the point where there stress level meets the target threshold. If we see someone’s stress getting too high, then we might ease up on the staffings a bit. If an analyst is pushing back on staffings but we can see that they are barely in the stress radar, then we would staff them regardless. Just an idea, wanted to gather some thoughts before conveying the idea to seniors. Let me know what you think.