College Workload / Stress ?

I graduated from Carnegie Mellon. The workload was tough. I have heard that Chicago, CalTech, Cornell, and Cooper Union is tough as well.

That leads me to wonder - do the top D-1 colleges (HYPS, Duke, etc) have high workloads?

On one side of the argument, I was annoyed throughout college because I had I was spending weekend after weekend in the lab, while I knew people from "better schools" just dicking around, partying and pulling 3.8+ GPA's with seemingly no effort. Also there is the saying that "It's hard to get in, but once you're in, it's a cakewalk". In addition, many of these schools are D-1 schools, so you can't pile the workload too high or athletic performance will suffer.

On the other side of the argument, you could make the case that the workload is harder than "lesser colleges", including mine, but these guys are all-stars anyway, so they could handle it. Also, there are books, such as "Running of the Bulls" which indicate that these colleges actually do have high workloads.

16 Comments
 
breakinginnewI agree it depends on the major etc, but I have also read that the top schools generally have very high average GPAs...like princeton at around 3.4 I dont know exactly what the distribution looks like, but i 3.4 is pretty high

This doesn't necessarily speak on the workload at these universities... just hints at the possibility of grade inflation.

 

it depends on the major. majors that require lab work obviously take up more time. it's not a cake walk for anyone at HYPS if they had to be an engineer.

Need stock/investing tips? Drop us a comment. http://chinameninvesting.wordpress.com
 

I did less work in college with a higher GPA than HS.

Jack: They’re all former investment bankers who were laid off from that economic crisis that Nancy Pelosi caused. They have zero real world skills, but God they work hard. -30 Rock
 
QueensFinestWell that also depends on your HS...my HS was a joke and had massive grade inflation. We graded on a scale of 100 points - if 90/100 is a 4.0 then I'd say over 50%-60% of my HS class would have graduated with a 4.0

Fair point, mine was pretty tough. Top of the class could be top of the class at any college. Also 94-A, 90-B+... no A-'s, was annoying. I guess it prepared me pretty well for college though.

Jack: They’re all former investment bankers who were laid off from that economic crisis that Nancy Pelosi caused. They have zero real world skills, but God they work hard. -30 Rock
 

Carnegie Mellon is predominately a science/engineering school. Schools in the same vein include Caltech, MIT, University of Illinois, Georgia Tech. If you were a science/engineering major at those schools, you probably had to bust your ass to get the grades you did.

On the other hand, there is rampant grade inflation at many of the prestigious WSO-approved targets. Princeton has a policy in place to combat grade inflation, but none of the other schools have followed suit.

It may feel unfair to you since most target students essentially get a double boost. They get the brand name of their target which comes with massive recruiting resources AND they get an easier grading curve. It is what it is. Just work extra hard.

 
Best Response
NeverSurrender On the other hand, there is rampant grade inflation at many of the prestigious WSO-approved targets. Princeton has a policy in place to combat grade inflation, but none of the other schools have followed suit. .

Not true that other schools haven't followed suit. I go to one of the aforementioned targets and while the policy is not school wide, almost every major including my own has a policy for grade targets in core classes. Most of my classes were curved to between a 2.9 and a 3.3 (depending on level, 100, 200, etc.)

To answer the original question, I think that getting in being the hardest part is very true. I have about a 3.5-3.6 and manage to go out almost whenever I want to. There will be stretches of hard work but you can also go M-F without opening a book some weeks. Class is generally optional as well I have found, unless it is a smaller class or one that takes attendance.

 
cheese86
NeverSurrender On the other hand, there is rampant grade inflation at many of the prestigious WSO-approved targets. Princeton has a policy in place to combat grade inflation, but none of the other schools have followed suit. .

Not true that other schools haven't followed suit. I go to one of the aforementioned targets and while the policy is not school wide, almost every major including my own has a policy for grade targets in core classes. Most of my classes were curved to between a 2.9 and a 3.3 (depending on level, 100, 200, etc.)

That's a pretty lenient curve.

I went to a top 5 science/engineering school and classes in my major were curved to between 2.3 and 2.6.

 

Grade inflation huh?

I personally go to a complete non-target school where all of the classes taught through the business school are affected by grade deflation. Essentially the average of the class has to be between a 2.6-3.2 (that is LOW), so even if the majority of the class gets a B+ or above, they will most likely get dropped down at least a half letter grade.

 

Grade inflation huh?

I personally go to a complete non-target school where all of the classes taught through the business school are affected by grade deflation. Essentially the average of the class has to be between a 2.6-3.2 (that is LOW), so even if the majority of the class gets a B+ or above, they will most likely get dropped down at least a half letter grade.

 

Repellat amet perspiciatis mollitia facere non sed. Dicta molestias harum autem. Eius exercitationem voluptatum repudiandae esse non id. Odio quia earum mollitia ex.

Unde ipsam incidunt commodi debitis commodi velit enim. Rerum nulla voluptas enim eum. Animi qui earum illum aut. Nihil unde neque dolores doloribus mollitia recusandae delectus. Molestias et voluptatum ea quibusdam omnis quia inventore.

Porro minus iure cum molestias enim iusto. Facere culpa nulla nulla dolorem quos consequatur exercitationem.

Saepe ipsam fugiat amet impedit sequi. Rerum suscipit illum laboriosam accusantium porro dolore repellat. Voluptatibus eos nihil error ab sit ad nisi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”