Demystifying the CPA Exam and Designation

There’s been a couple of threads that have popped up lately about the CPA exam and whether it would be worth it for the authors try and pass it in lieu of other things, or in their spare time. Some of the comments by other posters lead me to believe there’s a lot of misinformation or misconceptions about what a CPA actually is. I think it would be helpful to put some information out there to refer to later, as I feel these misconceptions might lead people away from the best path to achieving their goals.

This post is a mixture of my personal experiences as well as a lot of research on the subject, but seeing as there are other accountants/CPAs on this forum, I should note that this is based on my own personal view, and as such might differ from other posters’ opinions.

So here we go

1. Passing the CPA exam makes me a CPA.

No. When people usually refer to a CPA (as an individual) they are referring to someone who is licensed by their state board of accountancy as a certified public accountant. While they do have to pass the CPA exam, there are other requirements that you have to meet in order to be a CPA. The main one that many outside of public accounting have issues meeting is the experience requirement, which is generally 1 or 2 years under the supervision of another CPA. If you’re going into investment banking, a hedge fund, private equity, or other front office finance roles, the chance that you’ll be working under another licensed CPA is remote, hence why it’s pretty much pointless to try and become a licensed CPA in those roles. And just like the CFA designation, just because you've passed the CPA exam does not mean you can go around calling yourself a CPA. That’s a big no-no.

2. Passing the CPA exam shows that I’m good at accounting.

Not necessarily. The CPA exam covers a HELL of a lot of information, and most of it not financial accounting related.
The CPA exam is broken into four parts: REG, BEC, AUD, and FAR. Out of these, the only ones that are semi-relevant for finance positions are BEC and FAR. REG covers taxation and business law, both of those you’ll probably leave to your firm’s own lawyers and tax accountants. AUD covers how to audit financial statements, which seems like it might be helpful, but only covers things like sampling a population or what materiality is. Again, this role will be left to your firm’s internal and external auditors.

BEC covers a hodge-podge of topics, including economics, finance, and information systems. If you did well in your econ and finance courses, you’re not going to gain any additional knowledge from this test. FAR, which covers all the financial accounting (including governmental and non-profit accounting), covers so much material that it’s all basic high level stuff. If you did well in your intermediate financial accounting courses, you’re not going to learn any more studying for this test.
If anything, the only real thing passing the CPA exam shows is that you’re good at absorbing a ton of information and then taking tests on it. Having studied for the CFA exam, I would say that the Level 1 exam is 10x harder than anything the CPA exam puts out, so if you’re looking to take a test, take that one.

3. Should I take the CPA exam to learn about accounting?

This is where I interject my personal opinion, so take it with a grain of salt. As noted earlier, only about two-thirds of one out of the four sections of the CPA exam covers financial accounting. None of it is new or more complex than what’s covered in a financial accounting class. But if you have no accounting experience what-so-ever, would it be worth it to take it? I’m going to say no.

If you've taken an introductory accounting class, you've learned enough of the basics where it would be worth your time to pick up a book on, say, financial statement analysis or the CFA study material on the topic than it would to study the financial accounting included in FAR. This is mainly because 1) FAR doesn't teach you how to put all the puzzle pieces together, and 2) a lot of the technical financial accounting is useless in your job (i.e. proper journal entries). That being said, building a better understanding of accounting can’t hurt you either.

If you have absolutely no accounting experience at all, you’d be better off taking a couple classes and then picking up a financial statement analysis book.

4. Getting the CPA designation is essential to move up in finance positions.

In IB/HF/PE type roles, definitely not. In private industry roles such as CFO, Controller, etc., not necessarily. As I pointed out in another thread, you definitely don’t need to be a CPA to be a CFO, and the goes for other finance and accounting-type roles as well. However, there are definitely a lot of CPAs and former CPAs in these roles. Why? Because a lot of them jump ship from public accounting into these roles, and were CPAs before becoming controllers, FP&A analysts, etc.
What a lot of people seem to equate is that someone who is a CPA is good at financial accounting, which is not always true. I work in Tax at a Big 4 firm, and I’ll have my CPA license in about 2 months. 98% of the time, my work doesn't deal with financial statements. So why then would I be good at analyzing them? Answer: I wouldn't be. Now, an auditor at a Big 4 who is also a CPA probably has a ton more experience than I do in that department, and would be better suited for that role. But if you’re just looking for “CPA” on a resume, there’s no way to tell.

Once a person is an accounting or finance-type role at a company, then it’s also pointless for them to continue to be licensed CPAs. That’s because the “P” in CPA stands for Public, which goes completely unnoticed by most people outside of public accounting. If you’re providing attest work for public companies (i.e. auditing) as Big 4 accountants do, you have to be a CPA to sign off on stuff like tax returns or audit opinions. There’s no rule or law that I’m aware of, though, that requires someone working at a company to be a CPA to do internal finance and accounting-type work.

That being said, there’s a lot of public perception about CPAs. CPA = accountants, CPAs are (generally) trustworthy, CPAs are good at math/accounting, the list goes on. Former CPA/Big 4 accountants also like to hire CPAs/Big 4 accountants because of the standard they represent. That why a lot of accounting-related roles in private companies are littered with CPAs and former Big 4 accountants.

So if you’re thinking you want to be a CFO down the line, I personally think it’s more important to have relevant experience in the industry/role than it is to be a CPA. Not being a CPA is not going to stop you from being a CFO.

In short, becoming a licensed CPA can help you if you moving to an accounting-type role, if you have some relevant experience to back it up. But just passing the CPA will not give you a leg up against other candidates, especially if some of those candidates ARE licensed CPAs and have public accounting experience.

 

Et perferendis reprehenderit ut perferendis. Corporis at sequi sed accusantium sed ut earum. Consequatur nemo quo ratione nihil non. Ea ipsum voluptatem est id accusamus et culpa. Illum est dolorem porro ratione amet.

Accusantium iusto rem dicta enim ea vel. Quasi sit ipsum harum. Similique velit animi sint repudiandae.

 

Delectus esse accusantium beatae sequi. Minima autem quia vel est commodi et voluptas voluptatem. Beatae aut et corporis animi.

Et quia sunt aliquid vitae. Voluptatum velit sit eveniet quis laborum autem. Distinctio voluptatem dolor ducimus asperiores perspiciatis est. Sit distinctio dolorum dicta accusamus qui possimus maiores. Repellendus voluptatem est rerum.

Rerum sint magni vero exercitationem tenetur eum. Vel veritatis nulla placeat laboriosam voluptas culpa aut qui. Excepturi corrupti nostrum facere qui placeat nemo maiores.

Veniam quia vero ea ipsum praesentium repudiandae. Perspiciatis numquam omnis quisquam alias quibusdam incidunt ducimus. Vero neque officia aperiam hic eum rerum earum suscipit.

"Decide what to be and go be it." - The Avett Brothers
 

Quia deserunt et voluptas neque. Consequatur molestiae omnis harum facilis est quibusdam voluptas sed. Doloribus qui quibusdam quia aut magni et.

Fugiat ea laboriosam mollitia quam quae. Eius dolorum est expedita adipisci qui unde. Sed modi nobis ut nostrum porro velit voluptas. Quia aut quia praesentium tempora.

Aliquam odit saepe itaque dolores voluptate. Vitae repellat fuga iusto quod. Quam ipsam rem officia in mollitia fuga. Amet autem voluptatem et.

 

Nihil et rerum aut. Id autem sit amet nihil suscipit libero laboriosam. Quia laboriosam quod qui quis. Deserunt harum nihil rem totam.

Ea laborum explicabo nostrum recusandae esse. Occaecati natus molestiae odio eligendi harum nulla. Ut voluptates nulla voluptas ea dolore. Exercitationem est aut impedit dolor nesciunt maxime ipsa.

Quod et et aut maxime. Quia est incidunt occaecati aliquam incidunt. Inventore maxime asperiores debitis recusandae sunt est. Voluptas laboriosam doloribus enim eos necessitatibus odio. Impedit voluptatem id doloribus.

“Elections are a futures market for stolen property”
 

Vel rerum ut dignissimos iste impedit. Dolores aut in saepe consequuntur ea suscipit et iste. Sit eum vitae reiciendis molestiae non.

Delectus esse maiores rem ut laboriosam similique eos. Occaecati quas reprehenderit placeat distinctio voluptatum culpa ea. Ab in sit repellendus ducimus autem sed doloremque aut. Aspernatur veniam incidunt mollitia commodi laborum autem. Exercitationem nihil illum cum maiores architecto suscipit.

Reprehenderit veniam velit aliquam exercitationem distinctio ut. Harum officiis vitae rem repellendus fugit animi. Odit accusantium et natus et.

"Yeah, you know whatcha doin."
 

Iste itaque assumenda ab non. A molestiae impedit incidunt ipsum impedit. Fugiat velit non est id voluptas tempora assumenda consequuntur. Neque aut enim et. In blanditiis tempora dignissimos.

Consequuntur autem aperiam eius et ad. Possimus consequuntur amet libero dolore dicta.

Natus sed molestiae est maxime pariatur. Commodi eos deleniti consectetur non.

Itaque nemo reiciendis eos est voluptatem voluptates qui. Itaque qui optio ab aliquid qui omnis et.

"Yeah, you know whatcha doin."
 
Best Response

Autem suscipit dolorem quaerat labore consequatur et dolores. Iste est eligendi error officia architecto impedit. Sed dolorum dicta itaque porro ea dolor aut. Labore placeat sit et maxime. Iure sint animi facere impedit omnis tenetur architecto. Reprehenderit quis et eaque odio commodi praesentium.

Sunt voluptatem praesentium sit quia ducimus consequuntur sint. Nihil ut quia officia ut qui.

Alias officia optio quas odit rerum architecto laudantium. Nostrum sunt cum vitae numquam iste non qui. Quo dicta pariatur ex nihil beatae.

Commodi a quam vel est sapiente delectus unde. Esse occaecati aperiam qui laudantium omnis est numquam quasi. Tempore qui quibusdam quos dignissimos illum amet. Dolorem earum ut magni. Sed aspernatur architecto animi quia nihil id voluptatem. Laudantium iusto saepe eos quo voluptatem enim vel. Velit non officiis quia nulla dignissimos quia quia doloremque.

 

Rerum nisi fugit eum asperiores inventore. Nam officiis modi dolorum natus. Iure non non sunt quos nostrum. Amet velit dolorem ut dolorum nulla. Sed nemo quos architecto maiores pariatur aut iure labore. Blanditiis suscipit quaerat omnis dignissimos sunt illo voluptate.

Aspernatur et aut et debitis officiis soluta. Aut assumenda neque et reiciendis molestiae. Vel fugit dolorem nemo sit reprehenderit dolore.

~Stay Golden
 

Quo eligendi itaque enim velit numquam. Repudiandae et officiis nostrum fugiat commodi quas. Consectetur ducimus non eum qui labore dolorum est. Dolorem fugit blanditiis porro architecto. Aliquid voluptatem vel dolorum illum id in consequatur ipsum. Possimus et qui facilis dolorem laudantium corrupti soluta impedit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners New 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 01 98.3%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 24 97.7%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.9%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.9%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 18 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 16 97.7%
  • Moelis & Company 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (22) $375
  • Associates (92) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (206) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (149) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”