Do you spend your entire dinner stipend?
Is it bad to consistently spend all $30 of my dinner stipend every day that I'm eligible to use it? Who keeps track of this and will it hurt my standing with the firm?
Is it bad to consistently spend all $30 of my dinner stipend every day that I'm eligible to use it? Who keeps track of this and will it hurt my standing with the firm?
| +30 | SpaceX IPO - what are your thoughts | 5 | 18h |
| +27 | Should I use Claude or chatgpt? | 14 | 12h |
| +21 | Funny Things to Say to Interns | 7 | 1h |
| +17 | How did you meet your significant other/partner? | 13 | 15h |
| +17 | London's future as a financial centre | 18 | 1d |
| The Great Debate | 9 | 3h | |
| +7 | Test post will be deleted automatically. | 11 | 21h |
| +7 | E ink/electronic notepads | 4 | 15h |
| +6 | Stay Sharp All Day With Best Modvigil 200 MG Tablet | 0 | 12h |
| +5 | get a model before you model | 3 | 1d |
Career Resources
You can and should spend every cent - don't see why it would be an issue
I’ve always wondered if this affects your bonus, like if your bonus is always let’s say 80k, but every dollar you spend on dinner decreases by that much
Always used to overspend (personally paid the extra on top of the $30)
No. The dinner stipend is literally a rounding error.
It’s easy af to spend it all given that delivery fees make up 1/3rd of the total
You think these firms making billions of dollars per year care if you spending $25 instead of $30 on dinner?
750 million a year If 100,000 people do it 5 days a week only at $30
Lol you think the entire company gets a dinner allowance and is working past 8p?
Goldman has what, 100-200 heads in IBD? That's nothing. They made $7.9 bln in Net Income last year.
This is one of the most non-target unemployed statement lmao. Not sure if you realized but JP Morgan Chase, the largest by headcount, has ~300k employees TOTAL. This is including the bank tellers at the local branches. I would be shocked if their IB headcount is above 2k globally. The median headcount is likely to be 1k. FYI VP+ do not use this dinner stipend. So the ppl that use this is likely even lower.
Dinners get expensed to the clients, it literally has no impact on the bank, the only person keeping track is the A/R team and that's just so they bill the client properly
As another user said, these are typically (but not always) expensed to the client (obvious example is if a deal falls over - at least at my shop, we certainly don't send a client expenses if a deal falls away. In fact under our engagement letters I doubt we even have the right to. And we sometimes pick and choose which expenses to send to a client - travel for key meetings is usually essential, but printing, research, and late meals are often seen as a bit penny-pinching).
So, when a deal closes and we prepare the invoice. A VP or whoever will email the A/R team for an expense report, and that report shows each and every expense filed by each and every banker. Note that this is an XLS spreadsheet, and will say something like "John Smith - Late Meal - £23.45" (it won't show the itemised receipt - I presume one could request that but frankly that is a nosebleed level of pettiness).
Usually someone will review the expense sheet to check for errors. A client can request itemised expenses in theory, and if it turns out we accidentally charged them for some unrelated MD's stay at the Mandarin Oriental in Singapore for our deal that took place entirely in the UK, that's a problem. So someone will (or should, at least at my shop) see how much you spent on late meals and how closely you kept to the threshold.
That said, while it miggggght raise an eyebrow if you're expensing for meals everyday for two consecutive weeks when the deal was definitely quiet, I can't imagine someone actually raising this. Especially when a 3-day stay at a midtown hotel in New York for a handful of meetings outweighs your entire dinner expenses for the deal. Or when research costs someone aggregate to some ungodly number.
Does it impact reviews or bonuses? The only way I can see this happening is if your VP is outrageously vindictive and reviews your expenses and in their mind decides you were excessive and deicdes to use it against you when writing your review. Even then, I've been in review committees and if I were reading a review written by a VP that calls out dinner expenses, it says more about the VP than the AN to be honest. Bonuses are decided totally separately. You essentially (with some standard error that comes from the fact no one can read your mind) get paid the minimum amount needed to retain you. If you get zero, that isn't because of your dinner expenses.
Hope this sheds a bit of light on the topic, if probably way too much information. I've never in my career seen someone's expenses get challenged.
You clearly grew up poor
Very useful comment
Bro not everyone is blessed with Daddy’s money. Quit saying this and gain some perspective
Rerum nemo exercitationem dolor occaecati similique. Non dolores aut distinctio. Sunt repellendus quia dolore dolorem beatae. Ut doloribus magnam quia quasi sed. Ex assumenda ab et velit qui. Est enim unde facilis distinctio aperiam aperiam et.
Velit assumenda dolor dicta nihil nihil. Odio sit eaque quod aut quae voluptatem error qui. Eos qui voluptas recusandae dolorem labore id ut. Mollitia quibusdam repellendus mollitia nostrum fuga.
Numquam voluptatibus occaecati praesentium. Modi et harum dolores eveniet. Odio harum error tempora suscipit quia. Voluptatem blanditiis exercitationem nostrum quidem praesentium facere molestiae modi.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...