Feels like Trump is going to win big

He has the momentum. There is very strong energy around his campaign and genuine enthusiasm among his voters.

Kamala has none of that, she even got booed at one of her rallies last week. She is struggling to articulate a case for voting for her beyond that she isn't Donald Trump (which I think most voters could have figured out on their own).

It really feels like it's going to be a landslide and I wouldn't be surprised if Trump even wins the popular vote.

What are your thoughts on this?

87 Comments
 

It will be close, but Trump will prevail. 

"If you always put limits on everything you do, physical or anything else, it will spread into your work and into your life. There are no limits. There are only plateaus, and you must not stay there, you must go beyond them." - Bruce Lee
 
Controversial

Isaiah_53_5 💎🙌💎🙌💎

It will be close, but Trump will prevail. 

I really hate K, but i kinda feel like I need to hold my nose and vote for here because I'm a Reagan Republican.

The only difference between Asset Management and Investment Research is assets. I generally see somebody I know on TV on Bloomberg/CNBC etc. once or twice a week. This sounds cool, until I remind myself that I see somebody I know on ESPN five days a week.
 
Whatever1984

Isaiah_53_5 💎🙌💎🙌💎

It will be close, but Trump will prevail. 

I really hate K, but i kinda feel like I need to hold my nose and vote for here because I'm a Reagan Republican.

Must be the version of Reagan that was still a Democrat then because no Republican Reaganite in their right mind would support an ultra far left progressive who speaks ad nauseum about the need to regulate people's speech, the government's unending need for more power to "help", and moves in lockstep with the industrial war machine. Did you just completely miss his quote "If Fascism Ever Comes to America, It Will Come in the Name of Liberalism"?

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 
Most Helpful

His 3hr interview on JRE is already at 36m views on YouTube alone (despite not being allowed to trend), Rogan's 4th biggest episode ever in 72hrs. Doesn't even remotely capture the views from X, Spotify, and Apple which probably push it over 100m just off Joe's official channels. Best finish any politician could ask for.

Kamala's views on 8min appearance on Call Her Daddy (largest comparable female-led podcast in the US; which trended to the point even I got it recommended despite never engaging anything pro-Kamala or watching/subscribing to anything from CHD) haven't even broken 1m after 3 weeks... And her campaign's big October Surprise push is saying "Trump is literally Hitler" (how original) while posting pictures of the Nazis hosting a rally at MSG almost 100 years ago... 

Regardless of your politics it's hard to argue who momentum heavily favors right now. 

Edit:

And it just came out Kamala literally declined to do the same interview with Joe after SHE reached out to HIM. Was offered the same 3hrs 1-on-1 in-person interview while she was IN TEXAS and declined, countering with 1hr where he travels to do it with her with others in the room (and obviously to make it harder for Jamie to real-time fact check), which of course Joe refuses because that's not the format of his show. Her sheer entitlement is off the charts vs Trump who cleared his schedule for the opportunity and was hours late to a rally with 10s of 1000s of attendees.

This same person will go putz around for a townhall on CNN for a few 100k geriatric cable viewers but declines a 3hr uninterrupted opportunity to speak to voters on the largest show on the planet a week out from the election? Who the hell is running her campaign and thought this was a good idea? I'm genuinely irritated by this, would've made the best drinking game ever watching her stumble through 3hrs of unedited, unscripted conversation while knowing more eyes would be on her than ever before.

Trump now at 40m and #2 Rogan episode after 4 days. Wow. 

Edit:

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

Fugue

lol, comparing JRE and Call Her Daddy viewership as though that’s an apples to apples barometer of anything

It's a given that no interview-based media on the planet can go toe-to-toe with Rogan's viewership. CHD is or at least was the #2 or 3 biggest podcast in terms of total viewership and had $100m+ contracts offered by major streaming services. It's the largest public platform she's bothered to make an appearance on + it was being heavily promoted by the YT algorithm whereas Rogan's was actively suppressed by the hosting platform itself which easily cost it 20%+ of its potential viewership early on. It's not perfect by any means, but it's the best comp available considering she turned down the Rogan offer.

The fact Trump's interview still got 60x the viewership in 1/3rd the time and it's a much longer format vs the more easily consumable 8min piece she did speaks volumes, especially considering factoring in the media consumption habits of Democrats vs Republicans. 

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 
Devils Advocate

He most certainly isn’t winning the popular vote. I don’t even know how you come to that determination. 

Sources: Circle jerks, vibes, and information bubbles 

Trump can easily still win the election, but people on WSO are laughably out of their league when it comes to how politics actually work. These dudes need to read more and tiktok less. 

...but is it REPE?
 

Sources: Circle jerks, vibes, and information bubbles

> Trump is literally ahead in the polls for the popular vote.

> The same polls that consistently underestimated him in both 2016 and 2020 by 2 to 3 percentage points.

> Libs: "Those MAGAts are just delusional"

God, the douchy arrogance of liberal zoomers and millenials. Unbelievable. You haven't learned a thing from the last 8 years, didn't you? If anything, you are the one who is stuck in an ideological and informational safe space, stop projecting.

 

Sources: Circle jerks, vibes, and information bubbles 

Trump can easily still win the election, but people on WSO are laughably out of their league when it comes to how politics actually work. These dudes need to read more and tiktok less. 

popular vote

Maybe you should have spent more time on TikTok and read less leftist propaganda.

 

For those that are Trump supporters, how do you reconcile with economists agreeing that his economic and trade policies will widen the country’s deficit? I’m only asking because I’m buying my first home and the mortgage rates are closely tied to the 10 year treasury yields and rates have been climbing as the market is betting that Trump will win. It sounds like Trump winning the election will be bad for homebuyers like myself.

 

Rick_Sanchez009

For those that are Trump supporters, how do you reconcile with economists agreeing that his economic and trade policies will widen the country’s deficit? I’m only asking because I’m buying my first home and the mortgage rates are closely tied to the 10 year treasury yields and rates have been climbing as the market is betting that Trump will win. It sounds like Trump winning the election will be bad for homebuyers like myself.

The country's deficit is driven more by its own printing & spending of money with reckless abandon than anything else. Democrats don't give a fuck about the deficit and have never even claimed to. Also most mainstream economists are utter clowns you should disregard because they buy into modern monetary theory which is on its face a failure. 

Democrats as a monolith run as the party of welfare handouts and entitlements, promising free healthcare, education, etc. which of course isn't free, it's paid for by the government. There are tons of wasteful examples that have their broad support:

  • Billions of taxpayer dollars are wasted on the 10s of millions of criminal aliens that Democrats have allowed to swarm into the country during this administration. Kamala herself was in charge of the border and for Trump's entire presidency was actively against any notion of border security, only suddenly changing her tune when it became untenable the past 6-12 months then tried to pretend a bullshit "bipartisan" bill that would've legalized over 2m of these invaders every year was somehow a solution.
  • The current admin also blew something like $50 billion across programs for building EV charging stations and connecting rural communities to the internet - they built 8 chargers and connected 0 citizens when they could've contracted less than half that amount with someone like Tesla/Starlink and had incredible outcomes.
  • And lets not even get into how many billions are being wasted in Ukraine, the Israel/Palestine since 10/7, etc.

In contrast, Trump is running with the idea of massive Federal govt. cuts and has built a team around him that echoes that sentiment:

  • Elon wants to establish a Department of Government Efficiency to address prevent programs like the stupid aforementioned rural wifi and charger building ones from ever seeing the light of day.
  • Vivek has talked numerous times about taking the Javier Milei approach cutting entire departments off at the ankles firing 50%+ of people at random because the government is so bloated at this point its overspending is what's driving real GDP growth.
  • The biggest waster of money as a department is the DoD, because the military industrial complex wants to keep its forever wars going (see $2+ TRILLION wasted in Afghanistan alone) - Trump as well as Tulsi Gabbard and RFK are all against the continued wasting of tax dollars in these foreign conflicts.
  • Healthcare system is another massive drain and RFK is the only mainstream candidate to take that on as an issue in modern history, specifically targeting big food and pharma for their shady practices, regulatory capture, and blatant cronyism with the FDA/CDC/NIH which was on display during the Covid pandemic years. 

Addressing specifically economic/trade policy - Tariffs, which are the main focus, have nothing to do with rates. They're about forcing foreign actors to compete with domestic labor so a low cost labor country like China doesn't get to completely undermine an entire industry like they did American mfg with slave-like conditions. The price increases that result from them are NOT inflation-based, which is caused by the oversupply of money due to Fed policy, but essentially a form of consumption-based taxation. Combined with how he's been floating the idea of no taxes on tips, overtime, social security, and in a couple of cases income all together is an incredible 1-2 punch because it moves the burden of taxation from individuals to consumption itself. The American market is so large & rich that other countries will put up with the tariffs to be here. So no, this particular aspect of his policy has nothing to do with your home rates. If you're worried about inflation which is what results in rate hikes, then see Biden's administration that's overseen the worst in 40 years. 

Edit:

Oh and if you're worried about being a homebuyer - Kamala's talking about giving $20k+ down payment assistance to low income AND illegal immigrants. If anyone learned anything from 2008 (or a highschool econ class), it's that giving free money to the most financially illiterate and irresponsible segment of the population as it relates to home purchases results in a massive bubble inflating prices. Tack on the obscene amount of spending we've gotten from this admin (they added over $500b to the deficit from just normal operations in 1 month) we're almost certainly going to see a resurgence in inflation regardless of who wins next week. Which means higher rates. So yeah, if home prices are really your deciding issue it's a no brainer here who the better option is regardless of your politics.  

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

Those economists are all libs.  Someone posted to X that each and every one of them has donations, appointments etc that indicate they are aligned formally with the left.

And only half the living Nobel laureates signed that letter.  You can be certain the other half were offered the chance, and need to ask why they didn't.

Lastly, consider both quantity and quality of deficit.  If you create a deficit by leaving money in the pockets of taxpayers, they spend it relatively efficiently on their needs compared to the government who tends to spend it wastefully.  Furthermore, big programs spawn more big programs, while a smaller tax collection may spawn a more austere budget in the future (a man can dream).  We could at least try it, instead of raising taxes and spending all the time. 

So I think it's very dishonest when people act like a spending-driven deficit and a tax-cut-driven deficit are the same.  

 

I really don’t care what the economists say for the most part. Any think tank just writes whatever the donors tell them to and since macro projections are so fuzzy to begin with, they’ll just play with the data or models to make their political points.

Dont feel like mainstream economists making economy predictions are worth anything, they have nothing at stake and just basically guessing.

 
Rick_Sanchez009

For those that are Trump supporters, how do you reconcile with economists agreeing that his economic and trade policies will widen the country’s deficit? I’m only asking because I’m buying my first home and the mortgage rates are closely tied to the 10 year treasury yields and rates have been climbing as the market is betting that Trump will win. It sounds like Trump winning the election will be bad for homebuyers like myself.

Short term pain is expected. Sometimes...you have to be prepared to take a personal hit for the sake of improving your country's future.

 
Funniest

Sigma.Batman

Not after Pwerto Rico

waaaah the Tom Brady roast comedian made jokes about every group but I took particular offense to the part of his act the MSM presented out of context as if it were a serious political statement waaaah

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 
PrivateTechquity 🚀GME🚀

waaaah the Tom Brady roast comedian made jokes about every group but I took particular offense to the part of his act the MSM presented out of context as if it were a serious political statement waaaah

You may not care, but there's data on this. Swing state Latinos certainly seem to. 

YouGov / Univision Noticias - Pennsylvania Latino Voters (Post Madison Square Garden)

400 RV | 10/29-11/3 | MOE: 5%

🔵 Harris: 64% (+34)⭐

🔴 Trump: 30%

Sixty-nine percent of respondents found comments such as referring to Puerto Rico as “a floating island of garbage” to be “more racist than humorous.” Only 17% of respondents viewed the remarks as intended jokes rather than serious commentary, suggesting that Trump’s attempts to appeal to Latino voters may be undermined by the offensive language employed by speakers at his events.

Commercial Real Estate Developer
 

I think Trumps momentum is exaggerated by his supporters online presence but he’s still gonna win.

Personally not voting for trump despite hating Kamala and her policies especially with the border because the guy is way too old at 78 and JD Vance is an absolute grifter and would sell out his whole bloodline to become president.

 

Joe Rogan's a right-wing echo chamber? Dude's a CA liberal that grew up in SF / Boston and was a Bernie supporter in both the prior elections lmfao

"If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 
premia

You guys seriously live in echo chambers

Like, I stopped listening at "win big"

Whoever you like the one certainty is that it'll be close.  I've said my opinions before, but this isn't going to be like Reagan 1984.

The only difference between Asset Management and Investment Research is assets. I generally see somebody I know on TV on Bloomberg/CNBC etc. once or twice a week. This sounds cool, until I remind myself that I see somebody I know on ESPN five days a week.
 

Sensing a lot of overconfidence from my fellow Trump supporters.  Here are the myths that concern me:

Myth 1. "Biden was polling ahead by 5% or more in 2020, and barely won, so if Kamala is in a dead heat in polls she's in trouble."  There's actually a lot of indications that pollsters made large adjustments starting in '22 to make sure they don't under-count Republicans.  That led to a disappointing '22 for GOP, where pollsters showed a red wave and Dems instead won big.  So the idea that we'll get a bump in real votes because we did in '20 doesn't seem accurate.

Myth 2. "Early voting is showing much higher % of GOP voters."  It's a very weak sign.  Dems voted early in '20 because they were hysterical about Covid.  So that alone projects lower early Dem voting this year.  GOP avoided early voting in '20 because the party/Trump had messaging against it.  Not so this year.  Young libs recently like to report as independent.  All of these factors contribute to a GOP advantage in early voting relative to '20, without the GOP actually gaining any ground in the end.  

Myth 3. "Swing state polls are looking positive for Trump".  Look at the '22 and '23 final results and you'll sober up real quick.  Pennsylvania elected a Dem governor by 15% margin, and a Dem Senator with a serious brain injury by 6%.  Just last year, GOP underperformed in all 3 governor's races, winning 2 deep red states by a razor thin margin and losing Kentucky.  These are recent bloodbath results for the GOP in a very similar environment to what we have today.

I still give Trump the edge.  But barely.  My friends telling me he's got it in the bag are in for a big surprise.

 

Myth 4: The average American is smart enough to realize the vacuous nature of the Kamala campaign and smart enough to realize that Trump is not Adolf Hitler.

Myth 5: The system is not rigged. Appears to be rigged when it comes to the media, social media, justice department, presidential candidate security, etc. Hopefully, our electoral system is not rigged as well.....I really hope so. Seems like a lot of people are willing to do anything to stop Trump. Do they cross the line at election integrity?

If #4 or #5 are myths, nothing else matters.

 

People on both sides are absolutely convinced their candidate is going to win because they live in their echo chambers. Realistically trump is in the lead but it’ll probably be a close race.

 

dlrulz

Election is going to come down to how many women vote against their own interests.. if it's enough than yeah Trump will win. 

Totally agree. Comes down to whether women will vote for their own interests or the life of an unborn human being.

Hoping people realize that there is more to this life than your own self interest and make the right decision. And hoping that they realize this whether we are in an election or not.

 

Serious question from a relatively apolitical person: what do you guys make of the following topics?

  1. Trump denying election, Jan 6 and all
  2. Public history of sexual misconduct
  3. Constantly lying (feel like even Trump supporters know he lies constantly right?)

Don’t some of these things make it hard to trust him?

 

1. The real story of January 6th is the Dems trying to turn it into another 9/11 or Pearl Harbor.  Trump being a crybaby about losing is something we'd already weighed years earlier when we decided to support him over career criminal Hillary Clinton.

2. Funny how sexual misconduct stories always come during election years, and always from leftist advocates.  One of life's great mysteries.

3. Lying is relative.  The left wants to turn this country into a socialist dystopia and is telling you that they're smarter for it.  Is that just lying, stupidity, or both?  I don't really care . . I just don't want to live in a socialist dystopia.

 

Agreed. I already voted for him and I think he has a shot at winning. I also bet a few hundred bucks on Kamala just to lock in a little consolation prize for myself if she does pull it off. Would be a 2.6x if she wins. Massive divergence of betting market odds and polls right now so it will be interesting to see which were more predictive once the election is over.

Thinking back on the summer it is just surreal that the democrats tried to gaslight everyone for years that Biden was fine, then turned around and replaced him with zero shame. And now Kamala who received zero primary votes is the ‘sacrificial lamb’ so Newsom and other more viable dems don’t look like damaged goods in 2028. When asked about her platform she said she wouldn’t do anything different from Biden, so what’s the point? Brat Summer is over and Waste Management Winter is imminent... Taking out the trash lol

 

You seriously have to be braindead to vote for Kamala.
 

Imagine voting for a candidate that is ultra low IQ, can’t even string a sentence together, and who has been jointly responsible for the policies of the past 4 years.

I find it amusing that Americans believe everything they read, especially the fabricated news articles since June 2024 about how Kamala is a qualified candidate.

So she suddenly went from being the worst VP in history (as per the legacy media articles from January 2021-2024) to a ‘sensible leader’??

Americans deserve the mess they’re in because all they do is sit in front of a TV and watch the legacy media. 

Do they do independent research? No.

Do they ask who funds the news agencies and tabloids? No.

 

Lot of people in this thread are gonna be mighty upset when Trump goes 0/2 against members of the Biden administration this time.

Read the room. Trump lost as an incumbent and shit all over the halls of government on his way out with the help of his most degenerate supporters. It’s been almost 10 years since 2016. Being a bombastic asshole in politics isn’t shocking or fresh or funny to most people anymore, and the entire culture of proud ignorance and toxicity that characterizes the modern GOP - which was once funny because it trolled a calcified liberal establishment - is now no longer amusing, partly because it has become a part of the establishment.  Watching Trump emasculate GOP worms like Ted Cruz in the primaries was funny, and watching him humiliate Hilary made a lot of people feel good. Watching him and his entourage of dickhead idiots, plastic surgery victims and sycophants hold circus in Washington for another four years is a bit much for most of us.

I mean they actually overturned Roe lmao, take that for starters and venture a guess how most women are gonna vote. Do you think men will vote as disproportionately in favor of Trump? Simple as.

Array
 

Fugue:

Lot of people in this thread are gonna be mighty upset when Trump goes 0/2 against members of the Biden administration this time.





Read the room. Trump lost as an incumbent and shit all over the halls of government on his way out with the help of his most degenerate supporters. It’s been almost 10 years since 2016. Being a bombastic asshole in politics isn’t shocking or fresh or funny to most people anymore, and the entire culture of proud ignorance and toxicity that characterizes the modern GOP - which was once funny because it trolled a calcified liberal establishment - is now no longer amusing, partly because it has become a part of the establishment.  Watching Trump emasculate GOP worms like Ted Cruz in the primaries was funny, and watching him humiliate Hilary made a lot of people feel good. Watching him and his entourage of dickhead idiots, plastic surgery victims and sycophants hold circus in Washington for another four years is a bit much for most of us.



I mean they actually overturned Roe lmao, take that for starters and venture a guess how most women are gonna vote. Do you think men will vote as disproportionately in favor of Trump? Simple as.


Aged like milk

 

Yep, I was wrong - turns out a majority of this country unfortunately has much worse judgment than I thought possible, even after seeing the bar fall as low as it has these last 8 years.

Assuming you’re a Trump supporter, congratulations on sowing the wind. See you when the storm comes around.

Array
 

Tenetur magni earum ab qui. Voluptatibus consequuntur id laborum esse rem fugit.

Vitae deserunt veniam in tempore et natus maxime et. Iusto accusamus autem minima incidunt facere sit sit. Eligendi non sunt impedit cum. Maxime sequi nihil maiores consequuntur in accusantium. Dolorem est aut et laudantium.

Laboriosam dicta itaque nobis. Autem rem id laudantium. Libero id est a autem similique. Sit voluptas voluptatem ad aspernatur ut repudiandae. Iste officiis non reprehenderit soluta sint. Corporis facilis eaque fuga deserunt consequatur.

 

Asperiores itaque sapiente est magnam eum repudiandae. Ut qui omnis eius earum nobis quis laudantium. Mollitia in labore veniam voluptate consequatur.

Vel delectus nulla sunt quo architecto ut quo. Sed sunt aliquid tempora consectetur suscipit necessitatibus dolorem. Doloribus molestiae quis ea aut ut voluptatem.

Quo est magnam fuga et sit numquam magni. Quasi sint modi nisi. Alias fugiat voluptate repellat rerum et repellendus.

 

Eveniet quasi natus et corporis saepe. Ipsam fugiat omnis numquam occaecati quo voluptas nesciunt cumque. Ut consectetur et consequatur ut. Perspiciatis dicta est consequatur. Eos voluptatibus at eos pariatur fugit dolorum velit.

Ut aliquam voluptatum cupiditate cum culpa ut. Ab omnis qui voluptates saepe in. Sed nobis ullam aut qui est velit possimus. Et animi laboriosam commodi doloremque quaerat.

Illo eius praesentium porro ut minus nihil consectetur. Est harum nihil assumenda ea adipisci id excepturi. Sit impedit officia error quam voluptatem fuga possimus dicta. Atque et nihil qui sed distinctio commodi. Explicabo impedit nisi quaerat quis repellendus temporibus et. Consequatur qui et nihil debitis inventore distinctio minus.

Et enim dolor voluptatibus amet quia. Commodi in doloremque inventore autem ipsa labore. Assumenda quo esse enim. Debitis ex delectus eos quos in facere.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”