Fusion with in a decade?

sling shot

Senior Gorilla

HF

9y

As someone who has some experience with high vacuum plasma physics and fusion reactors, don't get your hopes up here. Fusion is "a generation away" and has been since the 1960s. There a ton of problems with current designs that have to be overcome before an actual viable reactor is even worth thinking about. These guys made it smaller and quicker to iterate on.. so what? The largest obstacle with large scale reactors (i.e. Tokamak/ITER-sized designs) is plasma instability (kink/elliptic/sausage/etc) which isn't even a concern at the lab scale they're working with.

Fusion power in our lifetime? Sure. Fusion power in a decade? Not a chance.

Authored by: Certified Hedge Fund Professional - 3rd+ Year AssociateCertified Hedge Fund Pro

krostown-washington

Baboon

IB

9y

Sling Shot:
(kink/elliptic/sausage/etc)

Uhh, what is it you exactly have experience in?

http://inspirehep.net/record/1088737/files/figures_instab_locations.png

sling shot

Senior Gorilla

HF

9y

Authored by: Certified Hedge Fund Professional - 3rd+ Year AssociateCertified Hedge Fund Pro

redrocksky

Senior Orangutan

IB

9y

I agree, and the fact is it doesn't matter if it's Lockheed, NASA, DARPA or any other expert source claiming early feasibility for fusion technology because unless an actual properly functioning prototype is presented, it's all just babble at this point. People are tired of being oversold on this idea; if this news was that important, Lockheed's stock would have rallied instead being sold off like the rest of the market today.

heister

Human

O

9y

I see this as a shift in the mentality. Weirdly enough I attribute this to rooftop solar and terrorism. We are finally shifting our idea of how to build an electric grid from something on a national scale to something on a small city scale. If these small reactors can fix the issue of plasma stability, then why not just build tens of thousands of these small scale reactors and deploy them that way. It will make the grid easier to maintain, remove the threat of an attack on the grid doing large scale damage, and allow the grid to be far more flexible than it is now. Cities can change rapidly to meet the demands of growth and industry. So rather than spending 2 to 4 years building a power plant you could deploy one of these in a couple of months and have the closest thing to long term pop up power that doesn't require massive liquid fuel generators.

Follow the shit your fellow monkeys say @shitWSOsays Life is hard, it's even harder when you're stupid - John Wayne

sling shot

Senior Gorilla

HF

9y

Best Response

heister:

I see this as a shift in the mentality. Weirdly enough I attribute this to rooftop solar and terrorism. We are finally shifting our idea of how to build an electric grid from something on a national scale to something on a small city scale. If these small reactors can fix the issue of plasma stability, then why not just build tens of thousands of these small scale reactors and deploy them that way. It will make the grid easier to maintain, remove the threat of an attack on the grid doing large scale damage, and allow the grid to be far more flexible than it is now. Cities can change rapidly to meet the demands of growth and industry. So rather than spending 2 to 4 years building a power plant you could deploy one of these in a couple of months and have the closest thing to long term pop up power that doesn't require massive liquid fuel generators.

Plasma confinement time increases with the cube of the reactor volume (i.e. you need a big ass reactor before you can contain fusion long enough to extract meaningful power from it).

As an analogy: if a net-power producing reactor is the Saturn 5 rocket, then Lockheed is the neighborhood kids firing off bottle rockets in the backyard. It's a step in the right direction, but not exactly a breakthrough.

Authored by: Certified Hedge Fund Professional - 3rd+ Year AssociateCertified Hedge Fund Pro

krostown-washington

Baboon

IB

9y

I like to think they are more like North Korea, in your analogy

The Real Max

King Kong

PE

9y

Sed doloremque et illo et delectus. Aut non occaecati et dolores libero libero. Eum vel aliquam commodi debitis sapiente et. Nemo et voluptas dolorem corporis dolor est distinctio sit. Numquam libero et dolore sunt deserunt ut unde. Esse perferendis odio vitae fuga aliquam odio sequi. Non molestias tempora accusantium.

Tenetur ratione aut quam incidunt. Aut ullam officiis et eligendi. Ullam ea et dolore consequuntur autem eaque voluptas dolorem.

Itaque voluptas ducimus sapiente deleniti. Quaerat pariatur nihil dolores ut ut.