Based on everything I’ve seen / read about him and SoftBank, it feels like he’s just a salesman with a quite poor track record (aside from some home runs - I would argue largely due to luck and timing) who has managed to raise enormous funds.
Maybe I am missing something?
| +30 | SpaceX IPO - what are your thoughts | 5 | 18h |
| +27 | Should I use Claude or chatgpt? | 14 | 12h |
| +21 | Funny Things to Say to Interns | 7 | 1h |
| +17 | How did you meet your significant other/partner? | 13 | 15h |
| +17 | London's future as a financial centre | 18 | 1d |
| The Great Debate | 9 | 3h | |
| +7 | Test post will be deleted automatically. | 11 | 21h |
| +7 | E ink/electronic notepads | 4 | 15h |
| +6 | Stay Sharp All Day With Best Modvigil 200 MG Tablet | 0 | 12h |
| +5 | get a model before you model | 3 | 1d |
Career Resources
Get instant access to lessons taught by experienced private equity pros and bulge bracket investment bankers including financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel Modeling.
That arguably is VC / GE. For every Yahoo / Alibaba, there is a WeWork. I don't blame him for spewing irrational fantasies if the Middle East is willing to give him billions.
Masayoshi Son is undoubtedly a polarizing figure in the investment world. Based on the most helpful WSO content, his track record with SoftBank's Vision Fund has been a mix of extreme highs and devastating lows. While he has had some massive successes like early investments in Alibaba, his strategy of pouring billions into startups at sky-high valuations has often backfired, as seen with Uber, WeWork, and other high-profile flops.
Critics argue that his approach is reckless, relying on sheer capital to dominate markets rather than sound fundamentals. The Vision Fund's staggering losses, such as the $26 billion reported in May 2022, highlight the risks of his aggressive, "go big or go home" strategy. Internally, SoftBank has been described as chaotic, with deal teams competing for his approval, further complicating its operations.
That said, Son's ability to raise capital and his vision for transformative tech investments can't be ignored. Whether his successes are due to luck or skill is up for debate, but his impact on the venture capital landscape is undeniable.
Sources: SoftBank Vision Fund / GIC / Temasek, Amazon gets dumped, Venture Capital Salary versus BB and Private Equity, Which investing strategy will be most challenged this decade (‘20 through ‘29)?, Like a Rock | The Daily Peel | 9/26/22
thank you anonymous analyst, your commentary is highly valued
He had a brief stint pre-dot com bubble as the world's richest man. I think if anything, he's always been overly optimistic about tech. He has a ton of influence over the Saudis / Middle East and they are willing to throw bilions into markets like the US for potential return and as a result, there is more economic firepower internally for companies to grow rapidly within the US with significant international capital / access. Dana White / UFC is a great example of that.
I think he's a careless investor but as an American / Center-Republican, I'm happy to see Trump being in talks with him about the potential large investment into the US for AI infrastructure.
He's a visionary in a sense, but the simplicity of his communications strategy has a tendency of making him look like a simpleton (https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2025/01/21/softbanks_masayoshi_…).
His "coronavirus" deck is simply legendary. You can't make it up. He's had some wildly volatile calls that have gone to his benefit and gone against him, so nothing is really sure with Masayoshi Son except that big things will happen.
The amount of money made on Arm has to be many multiples of wework and pizza robot losses. Alibaba and Yahoo Japan were pretty great plays too. I actually think he's worth paying attention to, if not at least for the sheer quantum of high conviction flows he can direct.
I mean, he seems like any other VC person. Most of his "success" was built on an extremely favorable global macro credit environment. Like all "visionaries" or really anyone on Wall Street, all his success is thanks to him and most of his failures are because of adverse conditions. Which is just a egotistical way of saying "I provide no value"
That goes for everyone in tech/VC
Aperiam exercitationem molestiae aliquid sed est quia vel at. Ut aut aut sed autem enim. Voluptatem sit ex beatae eos quidem omnis. Magnam quia vel sit repudiandae esse minima voluptatibus aut.
Fugiat eos dolorum dicta nulla ut delectus modi. Quibusdam ab illum ea vel distinctio. Veniam aut commodi eum dignissimos earum eos molestias quod.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...