NYC private employer vaccine mandates - what is your company doing?

I've noticed you many times when still a lurker, but never for a positive reason... 

In the third wave of data collection in the Main Survey (2011–2013), six cognitive function tests were administered following piloting (Gray et al., 2011, McFall, 2013). Representing a range of cognitive skills, these tests have been repeatedly deployed in large-scale, population-based studies (Borsch-Supan et al., 2013, Lachman et al., 2010, Richards et al., 2004, Sonnega et al., 2014, Steptoe et al., 2013). Verbal declarative memory was assessed using both immediate word recall and delayed word recall tasks. Respondents listened to a list of ten words delivered by a computer; they were then asked to immediately recall the words and, again, at a later stage in the interview without having heard the words again. The number of correct responses was recorded on each occasion. For semantic verbal fluency, respondents named as many animals as they could in one minute; the final score was based on the number of unique correct responses. Using components of screening instruments for cognitive impairment including the Mini Mental State Examination (Crum et al., 1993) and the Cambridge Cognitive Examination (Huppert et al., 1995), respondents were asked to subtract 7 from 100 and then subtract 7 from their answer on four more occasions. The number of correct responses of a maximum of five was recorded. Fluid reasoning was assessed using a number sequence in which the respondent populated the gap(s) in a logical series. Respondents were initially presented with simple examples to test their understanding; those who seemed confused or unable to understand test requirements after the relaying of two examples were excused from the test. Remaining study members were administered two sets of three number sequences, with the difficulty of the second set determined by their performance on the first. A score was derived which accounts for the difficulty of the items. Lastly, for numerical reasoning skills, individuals were given three numerical problems to solve and, depending on their responses, were then administered a further one (simpler) or two (more difficult) problems. The total number of correct responses was recorded.

It's all dependent on whether you believe these petty tasks are a good predictor of intelligence (IQ tests would fall under this). Reminds me of the silly pymetrics games I took during recruiting where popping a balloon at the right time or spamming the spacebar would be a great indication of whether I would be a qualified analyst or not.

And even if this was the case, are you really taking average level statistics and applying them to individual people? 

I think as this point it's best to just keep quiet about it. Not your fault for not disclosing.

Wow, that's pretty insane. Boosters are still emergency use only (not FDA full approval) so I'm not sure how this is even legal.

(I'm pro-vaccine btw, just more pro-choice above all else)