SEC Expands Definition of Accredited Investor

Apparently, anyone who is registered and in good standing with the series 7, 65 or 82, would be considered an accredited investor.  Unless I am missing something,  if a person is a CFA charterholder or a Certified Financial Planner you are not considered an accredited investor.  This does not make much sense to me.  I think most states waive the requirement to take the 65,  if you have one of these designations.

8 Comments
 

That's just the starting point - they gave themselves flexibility to consider more down the road, and most likely will. Start out with some easy ones - registered folks - then move on from there. I'd suspect that some of those other 'non registered' type things - CFA, CAIA will be included at some point. You know how all this goes - start with a few, see how it goes, then open it up further. 

 

Maybe most bankers already meet the financial requirement? Haha - sorry, it's one of those days already. Bad jokes. 

It's the measured approach - their words actually. Starting with those more 'obvious', widely held licenses and then work their way down the list as time goes on. Probably as long as there aren't material, adverse impacts from these changes the committee will take their criteria and apply to others. The 82 makes sense (privates) - 7 and 65 covers sales of all types of products, etc. But realistically I'd guess those are in aggregate the most widely held, so they started there with the intention of adding more. 

I'd also wager that in this environment if they moved too quickly to include everything they'd be accused of not 'protecting' investors or some shit. 

 

This is actually old news.  FinTwit was talking about this last Wednesday.

Honestly, beginning with 7 and 65 holders is a bad idea  I used to frequently deal with FAs that had 7s all the time, and even before that I was in a large office where everybody had their 65.  There are a LOT of people who hold those licences that have no business anywhere near PE.  A CFP basically means that you are generally one of the better FAs out there, and probably know enough to make the investments, or to know that you don't know enough and to stay away.  Starting with people that hold some of the more impressive designations like the CFA Charter and say the FRM or CAIA (feel free to create your own list) would probably have been the best idea, since they are probably some of the least likely to unintentionally get themselves into trouble. Probably even less likely than current ''accredited investors.'

The only difference between Asset Management and Investment Research is assets. I generally see somebody I know on TV on Bloomberg/CNBC etc. once or twice a week. This sounds cool, until I remind myself that I see somebody I know on ESPN five days a week.
 

We are both probably a little biased here because we are both CFA charterholders. With that said, the 65 is waived in many states if you have either of those designations. In other words, you would not have to take 65 due to having completed a rigorous program but you are still not accredited.

 
Most Helpful

Sit animi et iste quia sunt omnis consequuntur nostrum. Incidunt velit quaerat inventore. Voluptate debitis ex aut nam. Sint dignissimos omnis dolorem magni.

Rerum perferendis corrupti minus ullam. Laboriosam architecto et a quis ea dolores quisquam. Molestiae nobis autem velit consectetur voluptas. Excepturi pariatur adipisci quasi expedita laborum corrupti.

The only difference between Asset Management and Investment Research is assets. I generally see somebody I know on TV on Bloomberg/CNBC etc. once or twice a week. This sounds cool, until I remind myself that I see somebody I know on ESPN five days a week.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”