Supreme Court: Fed MUST Disclose Emergency Loans

In a victory for both Bloomberg and the American people, the Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the Federal Reserve must disclose the borrowers' names, the amounts of the emergency loans, and the date they took place. The Federal Reserve has five days to comply, and Fed spokesman David Skidmore says they will do so. Of course, Bloomberg is ecstatic.

As a financial crisis developed in 2007, “The Federal Reserve forgot that it is the central bank for the people of the United States and not a private academy where decisions of great importance may be withheld from public scrutiny,” said Matthew Winkler, editor in chief of Bloomberg News. “The Fed must be accountable to Congress, especially in disclosing what it does with the people’s money.”

Ironically, all the arguments put forward by the Federal Reserve's counsel seemed to reinforce the decision that disclosure was necessary. Now the whole world will know which banks were the weakest and required the most help. I have a few of my own suspicions, so I can't wait to see the list.

As for the argument that disclosure will make banks more reluctant to avail themselves of emergency lending when they get in trouble, can someone explain to me why that's a bad thing?

Anyone want to bet on which bank needed the most? How about most frequent visits to the Discount Window? We could get a March Madness pool going for loser banks. Who's with me?

12 Comments
 

Eddie, this is major implications from a legal standpoint as to what FOIA can effectively do. I'm awaiting how many companies take advantage of this ruling for their own gain.

 

The top borrowers aren't really going to be surprising (Citi, BofA). The numbers I really want to see are Goldman's and American Express in particular and more generally anyone that suddenly became a deposit holding bank. We've discussed it before but this is the real meat of the "bailout." Unlimited access to liquidity so institutions that colossally fucked up in underwriting or in consumer credit capital markets could continue as going concerns while saying "move along, nothing to see here."

 
Best Response
AggravateThe top borrowers aren't really going to be surprising (Citi, BofA). The numbers I really want to see are Goldman's and American Express in particular and more generally anyone that suddenly became a deposit holding bank. We've discussed it before but this is the real meat of the "bailout." Unlimited access to liquidity so institutions that colossally fucked up in underwriting or in consumer credit capital markets could continue as going concerns while saying "move along, nothing to see here."

Agreed. This is why I always laugh when someone makes the "TARP was paid back with interest" argument. It's like, no shit dumbass, there were so many mechanisms put in place to ensure that the banks would not only continue along, but essentially make risk-free profits and grow bigger. Shit was a mother fucking cheat code for the banks, while everyone else suffered and had to deal with real world consequences.

 
TheKing

Agreed. This is why I always laugh when someone makes the "TARP was paid back with interest" argument. It's like, no shit dumbass, there were so many mechanisms put in place to ensure that the banks would not only continue along, but essentially make risk-free profits and grow bigger. Shit was a mother fucking cheat code for the banks, while everyone else suffered and had to deal with real world consequences.

I might buy some SB's because of this post. Common sense is so rare these days it's fucking baffling.

 

I am making a market on how many times the phrase 'the bush economy' or 'the busy administration' or some variant is used when these numbers are released. The over under is 7 times per hour per commentator. Pay out is 3:2 on the over and 12:5 on the under.

If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses - Henry Ford
 

Sunt autem animi culpa. Minus neque laboriosam explicabo cupiditate. Natus natus natus a sit. Quia qui molestias rem dolore incidunt reprehenderit voluptate. Animi velit sunt animi aut ut rerum laboriosam pariatur.

Quisquam magnam placeat et totam ut officiis quaerat. Non accusamus iusto iure. Quia quasi officiis laudantium magnam ipsa est ut.

Reality hits you hard, bro...

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”