Valuation of the week 1: A Tesla Test

I taught the first session of my valuation class, that I previewed in my last post, today. As part of that class, I do what I call a “valuation of the week”, where I pick a company and value it and then post both my valuation (with the spreadsheet and the raw data that I used) and a shared Google spreadsheet for anyone who wants to take my valuation and make it their own (by changing the assumptions).

I do this for two reasons. First, I believe that you learn valuation by valuing real companies in real time, not by talking about valuation or reading about it. Second, from a purely selfish standpoint, I pick the companies that I find interesting as potential investments or as real world case studies for my valuations of the week. I find the “crowd valuation” that emerges from this process to be useful in reassessing my own valuations.

As my first valuation of the week, I picked Tesla, for three reasons. First, as a technology company in an otherwise capital-intensive, mature business (the automobile manufacturing business), it stands out. Second, the company has a charismatic CEO, Elon Musk, an ambitious man (and I don’t mean that in a negative sense) with a great deal of imagination.

Third,  the stock has taken off in the last year, up more than 500%, fueled by both positive news on the product front as well as on the financial front (increasing revenues, declining losses, paying down of debt). 

At its current stock price of $168.76/share, the market capitalization for the company is more than $20 billion. The question for investors, both in and out of the stock, is not whether the company was a good investment over the last year (of course, it was) but whether it is a good investment today. You can download the most recent annual and quarterly reports for the company.

Using the standard metrics, the company seems  over valued. With revenues of $1.33 billion and an operating loss of -$217 million over the last twelve months, it seems absurd to attach a value of more than $20 billion to the company. At close to 15.4 times revenues, Tesla is being valued more like a young technology company than an automobile company. However, these standard metrics are also often misleading with young companies, since value should be driven not by revenues and earnings today but by expectations for these values in the future.

Expected Revenues

For Tesla to be able to deliver value as a company, it is clear that it has to scale up revenues. On the good news front, the company has had a good year, with the revenues in the first six months of 2013 of $956 million representing a surge from revenues of $41 million in the first six months of 2012. While growth will get more difficult as the company continues to become larger, the question of how difficult cannot be answered until we define the potential market for the company.

If we define it narrowly as electric/hybrid cars, the market is small (even though it is growing) and the potential revenues will have to reflect that. If we define it more broadly as the automobile market, the market is a huge one and Tesla’s potential revenue expands accordingly. 

Since the line between electric, hybrid and conventional automobiles is a fuzzy one, which will get fuzzier over time, I will take the view (optimistic, perhaps) that Tesla is an automobile company that happens to specialize in electric cars and measure its potential revenues by looking at the biggest automobile companies today. 

Based on revenues, the biggest companies are those that offer the full range (from luxury to mass market) of automobiles. It is true that BMW and Daimler make the top ten list, but they sell far more than just luxury cars. In valuing Tesla, I am going to assume (and I am sure that some of you will disagree) that success will bring them revenues close to those delivered by a company like Audi ($64 billion).

While it is conceivable that Tesla’s revenues could approach those of the auto giants ($100 billion plus), I think the revenue growth required to get to those levels would be incompatible with the high operating margins that I will be assuming for Tesla. Assuming that Tesla stays making just electric cars, this forecast is an optimistic one, insofar as it assumes a rapid expansion in the electric car portion of the automobile market.

Profitability

The second piece of the puzzle in Tesla becoming a valuable company is that it has to become profitable. Based on the reported loss of $216.72 million over the last twelve months, the pre-tax operating margin for the company is -16.31%. It is true that this paints too dire a picture of the company because the company did spend $306 million in R&D over the same twelve month period. Assuming a three-year lag, on average, between R&D expenditures and commercial payoff, and capitalizing R&D does reduce the operating loss to about -$21.86 million (resulting in an after-tax operating margin of -1.64%).
To get a sense of what the Tesla's operating margin will be, assuming it makes it as a successful company, I estimated the pre-tax operating margins of all publicly traded automobile companies globally, dividing the operating income from the most recent 12 months by the revenues over that period for each company.

Since automobile companies have volatile earnings, I also computed a normalized pre-ta operating margin for each company by looking at the aggregate operating income over the last decade, as a percentage of aggregate revenues over that period. The distribution of the both measures of operating margin (the 2013 value and the average from 2003-2012) is shown below:

Note that the sector has low pre-tax operating margins, with the median value of less than 5%. Companies at the 75% percentile generate margins of between 7.5% and 8.5% and there are a few companies that generate double digit margins.  One of the outliers is Porsche which reported a pre-tax operating margin of close to 16% in 2013, though its ten-year aggregate margin is closer to 10%. You can download the dataset that includes the key numbers for all auto companies by clicking here.
For Tesla, we will assume that its focus will continue to be on high-end automobiles and that is margins will converge towards the higher end of the spectrum. In fact, I am assuming that the technological and innovative component that sets Tesla apart will allow it to deliver a pre-tax operating margin of 12.50% in steady state, putting it in the 95th percentile of auto companies (and closer to the margin for technology companies).

I will assume that the margin improvements occur over time, with the biggest  improvements happening in the near years. The figure below captures the forecasted operating income and margin, by year, in my valuation of Tesla:

Based on my estimates, Tesla will generate more than $8 billion in operating income by year 10, making it more profitable than all but three other automobile companies today (Toyota, Volkswagen and BMW). 

Investment Requirements

Growing revenues roughly sixty fold and improving operating margins to match the most profitable companies in the sector will require reinvestment. Some of it will take the form of additional R&D, as Tesla tries to keep its competitors at bay, and some of it will have to be in more conventional assembly lines and factories, as production gets ramped up. Over time, I believe that the latter component will come to dominate the former.

In my forecasts, I have assumed that Tesla will have to invest about a dollar in capital (in either R&D or plant/equipment) for every additional $1.41 in revenues. That matches the industry average of the sales to capital ratio of 1.41 for US companies. Since the sales to capital ratio for technology companies is higher (2.66), it is possible that I am over estimating Tesla's reinvestment in the early years.

However, the return on invested capital that I obtain for Tesla in steady state (in year 10), based on my estimates of operating income and invested capital, is 11.27%, putting it again at the top decile of automobile companies.

Risk

Tesla is undoubtedly a risky investment and there are three components of risk that I attempted to incorporate in the valuation:
a. Business/ Operating risk: Tesla is exposed to substantial business risk, some coming from macro economic sources (the strength of the economy, inflation, interest rates), some resulting from technological shifts (the winning technology in the electric/hybrid auto business is still to be determined) and still more emanating from the sector (with every major automobile company staking out its claim on this segment of the business). To capture the risk,

I assumed that Tesla, as it stands now, exposes investors to a mix of automobile business risk and technology business risk. While I assumed a 60% auto/40% technology mix in arriving at a cost of capital of 10.03%, the value per share that I obtain is not very sensitive to this assumption:

Treating Tesla as a purely automobile company increases its value to about $74.73, whereas treating it as a technology company lowers the value per share to $60.84.
b. Geographic risk: While it is likely that as Tesla grows, it will have to look to emerging and more risky markets, I will assume that its risk exposure for the next decade will come primarily from mature markets, allowing me to use my current estimate of the equity risk premium for the US of 5.8% for the cost of equity/capital computations. 
c. Truncation risk: Tesla, in spite of its lofty market capitalization and recent successes, is still a young, money-losing company. A large shock to its business (from a legal setback, a recession or a sector-wide slowdown) could put the company's survival at risk.

While that risk has declined substantially over the last two or three years, I think that it still exists and will attach a probability of 10% to its occurrence. If the company does fail, I will also assume that it will lose a significant portion of its value in a distress sale (receiving only 50% of estimated value).

Loose Ends
As with any young company, there are loose ends to tie up that affect value. In particular, I would point to the following:

a. Subsidized debt: Tesla was the beneficiary of subsidized loans from the DOE, amounting to roughly $465 million. While this loan loomed large two years ago, when Tesla was a smaller company with more default risk, it has faded in importance partly because of Tesla's success (and the resulting access to capital markets). Since Tesla has paid down the loan, it no longer has any effect on value.
b. Net Operating Loss carry forward: At the end of 2012, Tesla had a net operating loss of just over a billion that it is carrying forward. I used the NOL to shelter income from taxes in the early forecast years, pushing up cash flows in those years. As a consequence, Tesla's income is sheltered from taxes for the first six years of forecasts.
c. Management/Employee Options: Of larger import are the management/employee options that Tesla has been generous in granting in the last few years. As of the most recent 10K, the company had approximately 25 million options outstanding, with an average strike price of $21.20 and 7 years left to expiration. Since there only 121.45 million shares outstanding, the value of these deep in-the-money, long term options represents a significant drag on value.

The Bottom line

The ingredients that make a young, money-losing company into a valuable, mature company are no secret: small revenues have to become big revenues, operating losses have to turn to profits, there has to be enough reinvestment (but not too much) to make these changes and the risk has to subside. I am assuming all of these at Tesla but my estimated value per share of $67.12 is well below the market price of $168.76. You can download my valuation spreadsheet by clicking here.

Is the value sensitive to my assumptions? Of course, and especially because Tesla is a young company in transition. In fact, replacing my point estimates for the input variables (revenue growth, target operating margin, sales/capital, cost of capital) with distributions yields a distribution of value for Tesla that reflects my uncertainty about the future:

Note that there are scenarios where the value per share exceeds the current market price ($168.76), but I would add two cautionary notes. First, at least based on my estimates, the probability that the value exceeds the price is small (less than 10%) Second, the combination of outcomes (high revenue growth, high margins and low risk)  that would yield these high values are difficult to pull off. 

You can accuse me of being too pessimistic in my assumptions, but the narrative that underlies my valuation is an optimistic one. I am assuming that Tesla will grow to be as large as Audi, while delivering operating margins closer to Porsche's. Even with these assumptions, I cannot see a rationale for buying the company at today's market price but that is just my personal judgment. You are welcome to disagree. In fact, if you download my valuation and change the key assumptions, please take a minute to report your estimate of value per share in this Google shared spreadsheet. Let's see how the crowd valuation plays out!
 

Et expedita in nemo. Similique qui sit et labore aliquam ad. Dolor illum quia modi velit qui.

Aut officia perspiciatis laborum temporibus qui itaque. Iure debitis dolorem vel aut nam voluptatem.

 

Accusantium sit unde illo voluptates tenetur sequi similique. Cupiditate quidem aperiam laboriosam consectetur vel et molestiae. Facilis iusto est perferendis corporis enim. Quo est aut accusantium.

Consectetur voluptas ut rem minima qui facere. Ut dolor quis earum reiciendis. Omnis aut harum placeat ea. Sint consequatur et reprehenderit velit. Quis beatae quidem nisi et voluptatem.

"When you stop striving for perfection, you might as well be dead."
 

Delectus est hic occaecati laborum quisquam. Nisi quis impedit qui delectus id eligendi. Quae repellendus unde voluptatem cum ut voluptatibus quis.

Temporibus saepe numquam est. Et laboriosam sed eaque quod rerum aut. Quia animi et qui natus vel. Ullam velit doloribus sunt eos ut mollitia illum.

Aspernatur tempora aliquid natus qui tempore veritatis. Et aut nostrum blanditiis aperiam. Recusandae et eius autem magnam minus.

Ducimus cum aut omnis sint ut et. Quae eius id velit ea sint assumenda. Magnam et voluptas aut itaque dolore. Et asperiores quia odio placeat ea quisquam. Illo labore quis sit tempore. Ratione amet aut sit et. Sunt doloribus exercitationem officiis.

-KermitBeee gurmitbhatia[.]com
 

Consectetur ea reprehenderit quibusdam cupiditate rerum mollitia molestiae ea. Quia voluptas voluptatem repellat qui perferendis autem. Sed suscipit dolorem ut facilis.

Iusto eaque velit eligendi qui laudantium qui rerum. Facilis repellendus dolores explicabo qui harum. Saepe cupiditate et quia. Porro doloremque vel tempora quis fugiat natus. Qui nam ratione cum doloremque vel sint voluptatum. Aut omnis dolorem consectetur soluta.

Optio possimus et in. Aliquid voluptas quo cumque officiis nihil. Dolorem atque iste distinctio ea optio impedit. At saepe ipsum fugit earum ut odio. Temporibus inventore illo aspernatur voluptatum sed. Eveniet ad aperiam voluptatem minima quia id voluptatem. Placeat quia qui exercitationem excepturi impedit.

 

Sit velit odit voluptas temporibus quibusdam incidunt autem. Voluptatem error excepturi atque est. Maxime quidem ab reiciendis. Consequatur alias numquam recusandae laboriosam.

Hic accusamus ratione tempora accusamus unde perferendis. Iste nemo vel aut repudiandae et. Sit blanditiis magnam rem quis voluptates dicta molestiae. Esse eaque quasi ab molestiae consequatur error. Dolor recusandae voluptatum consequatur illum eius hic.

Et alias quam eligendi quibusdam molestias qui perspiciatis. Aut et provident magni quae ipsam dicta. Ducimus impedit id quo dolores velit.

"When you stop striving for perfection, you might as well be dead."
 

Culpa cumque eligendi dicta repellendus. Dicta eos doloribus alias iure reprehenderit molestias. Quos minima omnis rerum. Adipisci ut tempore iure qui. Quisquam consequuntur voluptate aut nihil fuga repudiandae.

Magnam dolorem sit consectetur debitis dolores eos. Sunt consequuntur beatae expedita nisi deserunt. Beatae sapiente dicta nulla dolor quaerat laborum quasi doloremque. Voluptatem voluptates magni animi facere rem sequi.

Dolore sed iure fuga quod omnis aperiam maxime et. Quo exercitationem error placeat et. Debitis odit magnam quaerat eaque in. Nihil neque sunt non quos amet tenetur. Illum rerum cum cum nemo.

Velit fugiat placeat at maxime voluptatum nihil ex. Ea numquam id quam quia repellendus voluptatibus maxime. Expedita illo quod ab temporibus sint at hic. Consequatur esse recusandae placeat recusandae eius aut necessitatibus. Voluptatum repellendus iusto incidunt. Dolorem dolor voluptates eius neque rerum reprehenderit.

 

Dicta aut recusandae autem et magni hic velit. Aliquam in provident provident ut accusamus qui soluta.

Et iure suscipit consectetur velit sit amet. Tenetur corrupti aperiam cum magnam sequi minima. Dolorum et voluptatum ullam et quas. Rerum sit pariatur sint voluptas ut numquam labore.

Occaecati eligendi magni soluta deserunt et mollitia eum. Ducimus deserunt et quia. Aut tempore et animi veritatis molestiae facere nobis.

Voluptatibus enim dicta non provident. Consequuntur necessitatibus sit recusandae non. Tenetur laboriosam asperiores enim assumenda et omnis. Omnis cumque blanditiis exercitationem aut dolor nulla voluptatem.

WSO Content & Social Media. Follow us: Linkedin, IG, Facebook, Twitter.
 

Occaecati voluptates aperiam at inventore cumque nihil. Excepturi vero fuga officia in. Animi totam ab amet quae vero soluta.

Nihil modi et molestias accusamus repellat. Alias architecto ex illum ipsa.

I hope this is better than the last batch of shit you gave me. Produced more wood than Ron Jeremy. I don't want you to yell, "Reco!" anymore. Know what you should yell? "Timber!" Yeah, Mr. Fuckin' wood.
 

Hic qui animi atque facilis quia quos qui. Sint quia excepturi accusantium. Amet consequuntur magnam vel et totam. Ab aspernatur tempore rem porro tempora. Nobis et vitae veniam.

Totam qui dolorum qui expedita praesentium. Ut ea et iusto temporibus est dolor architecto enim. Et at qui vel.

Sit et quae dolorum. Velit saepe incidunt dolor nesciunt tempora. Ut ex deleniti sit sint ipsam. Reiciendis eveniet qui corporis. Earum quis amet asperiores minima voluptatem debitis inventore. Ipsam necessitatibus cupiditate in voluptatem est.

 

Rem atque eum similique rerum cumque culpa et. Quo omnis tempore dolores. Eum animi voluptatibus quod consectetur provident quibusdam.

Ad aut aut dignissimos officia quia voluptatem. Enim harum ut rerum consequatur possimus molestias. Quidem dicta rerum dicta odio quis debitis.

Esse cumque nisi exercitationem dicta consequuntur aliquid aut. Debitis fugit qui recusandae nesciunt. Eaque aliquid aut eveniet. Ullam odit consequatur repellendus aut voluptas neque. Cumque molestiae necessitatibus sint architecto recusandae.

Sint beatae qui voluptatem quia sint error aliquam. Sunt consequatur labore rem ut quidem enim consequatur. Suscipit at consequatur vel est.

 

Pariatur pariatur maxime pariatur aut omnis. Possimus aut ea ut repellat voluptas. Est illo id voluptatem et eum reiciendis. Repellat deserunt amet eveniet voluptates libero. Autem rerum quam fuga sit dolores. Non soluta quia eos quo est sunt.

Quis voluptas quis libero cupiditate laboriosam cumque. Quis in consectetur distinctio quaerat non eveniet. Sunt minima doloribus reprehenderit rerum enim necessitatibus. Sit nisi qui qui consequuntur voluptatem doloremque possimus perferendis. Voluptate hic itaque molestiae quasi. Debitis qui delectus vel voluptatem.

Enim doloremque in reiciendis iure et. Doloribus dicta qui nobis. Illo saepe mollitia recusandae ut. Nihil tempore porro voluptas ipsum. Quia tenetur laboriosam neque minus quam. Modi non fuga ut sit dicta provident unde.

 
Best Response

Animi aperiam et est ea. Quia ea consequatur laborum dicta consequatur fuga. Facere inventore facilis molestiae nobis sit tempora quo. Non eos maxime explicabo suscipit. Iusto soluta doloribus dolorum. Impedit architecto soluta aperiam quidem voluptatem dolorum. Non atque qui sequi enim est.

Consequatur non dolore consequatur voluptas. Molestiae nobis ipsum sunt accusantium non corrupti. Et quia tenetur unde molestiae consequatur quas.

Sed beatae assumenda quo molestias nihil. Qui aut non pariatur repellendus.

 

Perspiciatis modi sed aperiam quam nostrum. Ut et laborum fugiat qui explicabo et. Reprehenderit voluptatum ea rerum placeat in ipsa consequatur fugiat.

Ut illo et neque. Molestiae deserunt sunt cum officiis est.

Omnis et animi non voluptatem sit adipisci modi. Labore a dicta quae debitis facilis et. Voluptatem ut velit eum fugiat magnam ullam voluptas. Exercitationem aut aut nihil error eos. Eum numquam voluptate saepe. Minus nisi recusandae est voluptatum.

Winners bring a bigger bag than you do. I have a degree in meritocracy.
 

Reiciendis inventore ut reiciendis. Nostrum fugit dicta molestiae perspiciatis. Soluta ut voluptatem occaecati delectus quas quod nihil. Dolor soluta fugit enim sint. Dolor velit quo quidem voluptatibus ut amet molestiae. Molestias et velit non ut ex. Facilis atque voluptatem dolores doloribus veniam amet sit.

Impedit explicabo reprehenderit voluptatum nemo laborum. Quo dolor ut esse voluptatibus sed.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Lazard Freres No 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 25 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (21) $373
  • Associates (91) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (68) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”