Associates Handling NDAs

I hear about associates at other firms “handling NDAs” and that seniors have relatively little involvement with them. What does that mean? Does that mean the associates are handling the entire mark up and making commercial decisions around sticking points in the NDA? I hear this mainly at UMM firms while ASOs I know at MFs don’t touch NDAs ever. 

Is it normal for no external counsel to be involved in the process and for the associates to handle the entire NDA from start to finish, even with input from seniors? 

Obviously Ontra and the likes exist. Not talking about them. 

13 Comments
 

Yeah pretty common, we have a template with riders of language we can and can't except. Does not take very long. Also, never seen an NDA actually litigated although sure it does happen, possibly more in the MF space but in MM never seen it. In my experience, NDA's are more of a formality than anything

 

IMO a (cheap) lawyer should be doing the actual mark up and basic negotiations but associate should be responsible for most of the key points. If it’s something really sticky can run up the chain but for the most part senior people shouldn’t be involved. 

 

" Does that mean the associates are handling the entire mark up and making commercial decisions around sticking points in the NDA?" Yes. 

NDAs are necessary as part of the process, but are very difficult to enforce in practice. Hence why Associates are empowered to fulfill this stream with little to no oversight.

As another user mentioned, your firm should have some standards as to what language is generally acceptable or required. 

 

Just for a little bit more color at MF and our associates don't even do NDA markups. Its the associate's job to make sure it gets signed, etc. but we send it over to our in-house counsel and they mark it up and we just do messanger pigeon and only if there is some weird clause would I jump on a call to discuss.

Additionally,  we already have broad firm wide NDAs with many of the top banks (e.g., GS, MS) so just use the same exact NDA to execute so its pretty automated at that point

 

Depends if buying or selling. At my shop, first year Associates / BD team will handle on buyside given volume of new deals. If selling a port-co, it is the responsibility of the banker / ontra, with sticking points pushed up to outside council

 
Most Helpful

As someone who handles a lot of NDAs for my bank (3 process about 500+ NDAs processed last year), I found that a averaged about ~10 minutes per NDA of review, and an additional 2-5 mins of response. Sure this was sell side, but the tips, I found that helped me handle all these are:

  • Accepting Redlines as you go. If there is something that can be accepted, I accept it and don't revisit it. Helps make sure when I review I don't go over the same comments twice.
  • Saving NDAs to do all at once. I would wait until I had a good group of NDAs (~5-10) and would do them all at once. Its easier to get in a grove and handle a large group of them. Also, I have found most NDAs are not nearly as time sensitive as people think.
  • Know the key sticking points, We have about 5 things that we really push for on NDAs. Outside of that I have found most language to be interchangeable and does not matter. Aka as other have eluded to on the thread NDAs are not nearly as enforceable as we all think and I have never seen an NDA be litigated. I know you are reviewing different NDAs, but I would just try and find the non-solicits, venue, confidentiality, etc. and try to get the comments on those points

If I think of anything else, I will add it to the post, but best of luck in the redlines. 

 

here is what typically gets negotiated. I haven't done these in a while, so others can chime in (this is for a sellside auction)

  1. term: sellside friendly: 2+ years, buyside friendly =1 year. Just accept 18months to 2 years, but everyone once in a while you get an asshole that becomes aggressive either way.
  2. damages: sellside template will say that if they are infringed upon, buyside has to pay damages, etc. Just accept losing party will pay prevailing party.
  3. non-solicit: make sure it says you can talk to the employees in ordinary course of business and if they came to you for a job or through a 3rd party recruiter who posts a general job posting its ok.
  4. venue
  5. deletion of materials: this is annoying, might be forced to accept (from buyers perspective)
 

Et numquam officia doloribus magnam. Et expedita odit corrupti qui. Ut ut aut id vero. Quibusdam saepe aut impedit perferendis.

Et quae est unde tenetur nesciunt. Cumque corrupti et voluptates eos aut.

Autem delectus consectetur et enim nulla. Inventore velit officia enim aspernatur. Fugiat et occaecati qui unde magnam quo.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”