Big 4 infra financial advisory in Japan —> Infra fund

Hi everyone,

I currently work in the Corporate Finance department of a Big 4 firm in Japan, focusing on infrastructure financial advisory, with an emphasis on renewable energy projects. My role involves financial modeling, deal structuring, and related tasks, and mainly help Japanese buyer to acquire renewable energy projects in Southeast Asia.

The first question: I want to transition to a global infrastructure fund. Is this transition realistic given my current Big 4 background? Or would I need to go to IBD first to increase my chances of making the move?

The second question:  I suppose Singapore and Hong Kong are the key hubs for infrastructure investment jobs in Asia. How do Mainland China and Japan compare in terms of opportunities in this field? Is there significant demand for infrastructure investment professionals in these markets?

Any advice or information based on your experience would be incredibly helpful!

5 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, here are insights to your questions:

Transition to a Global Infrastructure Fund

  1. Realistic Transition:
    • Your current role in the Corporate Finance department of a Big 4 firm in Japan, focusing on infrastructure financial advisory, provides a solid foundation for transitioning to a global infrastructure fund. Your experience in financial modeling, deal structuring, and renewable energy projects is highly relevant.
    • While transitioning directly to a global infrastructure fund is realistic, having experience in Investment Banking Division (IBD) could enhance your chances. IBD experience is often valued for its rigorous training and exposure to high-profile deals, which can be advantageous when moving to a global fund.

Opportunities in Infrastructure Investment in Asia

  1. Comparison of Hubs:
    • Singapore and Hong Kong: These are indeed key hubs for infrastructure investment jobs in Asia. They offer numerous opportunities due to their established financial markets and strategic locations.
    • Mainland China: The demand for infrastructure investment professionals is significant, especially with the ongoing urbanization and infrastructure development. However, there is a strong preference for local talent, and language fluency is crucial.
    • Japan: While there are opportunities, the market is relatively smaller compared to Singapore and Hong Kong. The focus is often on domestic projects, and the demand for infrastructure investment professionals may not be as high as in the other hubs.

Additional Insights

  • Language and Local Knowledge: In Asia, local language fluency and cultural understanding are critical. For example, in Mainland China, being from the country and having local connections can be a significant advantage.
  • Market Dynamics: The infrastructure investment landscape in Asia is influenced by regional preferences and market dynamics. For instance, in China, there is a preference for local professionals, and in Japan, the market may be more insular compared to the more internationalized hubs of Singapore and Hong Kong.

For more detailed discussions and personal experiences, you can refer to the following threads on Wall Street Oasis: - https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/investment-banking/the-future-of-…</a">The future of Hong Kong high finance - https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/hedge-fund/qa-2nd-year-equities-l…</a">Q&A: 2nd Year Equities L/S HF Analyst in Hong Kong

These threads provide valuable insights into the regional differences and the evolving landscape of finance in Asia.

Sources: The future of Hong Kong high finance, Q&A: Megafund Asia Private Equity, Q&A: Management Consultant and Value Investor, The future of Hong Kong high finance, Q&A: 2nd Year Equities L/S HF Analyst in Hong Kong

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

I would recommend doing a stint in IBD first, perhaps in a smaller boutique such as BDA (I have heard that some people there exited to infra PE) or a top Japanese firm (Nomura has a dedicated M&A team, Mizuho has a team that covers healthcare, materials, energy and chemicals).

Ju
 

Thanks for the advice, it really helps! I know IBD is usually prioritized over Big 4 financial advisory in corporate finance M&A, but does that also hold true for infra and energy M&A? I feel like those sectors are pretty different from industries like healthcare or manufacturing.

Do you think Big 4 advisory might have better chances in infra and energy M&A because it's a more niche area?

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!

 
Most Helpful

Happy to help! 

The point you mentioned about energy & infra does seem true in my view as well, and I would think that your chances of breaking into PE could be higher than for generalist funds where an IBD background is strongly favored.

Your English also seems much, much better than that of the average joe working in finance in Tokyo, which would be a big advantage.

That being said, the rest should be highly dependent on what size the firm you are applying to is, and their hiring history. In my experience, larger cap American and non-Japanese Asian funds seem to strongly favor candidates with an IBD background, and in that case competing against those from American banks could be quite difficult, especially if the fund has had good experiences hiring from these firms.

Then again there are always exceptions, so it could be wise to discuss these with a third party. Do you know anyone from your firm who went into PE? Have you discussed opportunities with other agents from other firms looking at PE/IBD to get a third party opinion (the agents who are helping you right now may be a little biased since they get paid if you get an offer from a firm they referred you to...)? I would also recommend seriously considering applying to IBD just in case, as having done a stint in IBD, even for 2 years, will definitely expand your long term options. 

Sorry for not being the most helpful, but hope I still managed to be of some help!

Ju
 

Aut nesciunt culpa perferendis. Et ut quos et qui esse voluptatem repellendus. Sed corporis iste quae cum qui quae. Ut sapiente officiis earum eos et quia ut. Officiis qui nisi quis.

Impedit quae debitis porro et omnis voluptatum dolore esse. Ut minima qui cupiditate harum ipsum architecto. Velit at ad molestiae similique eveniet quaerat modi. Commodi distinctio fuga est temporibus eveniet unde sint sequi.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.2%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (353) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”