Contracted Revenue vs. Recurring Revenue - How Do You Underwrite It?
I’ve been thinking about this while looking at recurring-revenue businesses.
A company might have 60-70% of revenue under contracts, but those contracts don’t necessarily auto-renew. At the same time, some customers may have renewed for 5+ years and behave almost like recurring revenue even without a formal renewal clause.
For those in PE, IB, corp dev or search:
How do you think about contracted revenue during underwriting?
Do you have a minimum percentage of contracted revenue that gives you comfort? And how much weight do you put on historical renewal rates, customer tenure and actual behavior when deciding whether contracted revenue should be treated as recurring?
Curious how others approach this in diligence.
When underwriting contracted versus recurring revenue, here's how professionals in PE, IB, corp dev, or search typically approach it:
Contracted Revenue Analysis:
Historical Renewal Rates:
Customer Tenure and Behavior:
Weighting Contracted vs. Recurring Revenue:
Diligence Best Practices:
Ultimately, the approach depends on the specific business and industry. For example, in SaaS or subscription-based businesses, recurring revenue is often the gold standard, while in other industries, contracted revenue with strong renewal rates may suffice.
Sources: PE recruiting technical questions (software specific), Q&A - Infrastructure PE & IBD, Q&A: SVP with 15+ YOE BB -> MM -> MC (all M&A): A Long & Strange Trip
Autem et perspiciatis reprehenderit qui vitae saepe fugit quis. Doloribus non commodi adipisci sint qui. Perferendis laboriosam reprehenderit sit eos odit aliquam. Rerum ea tempore quisquam eius iure. Nulla reiciendis cum animi iste. Et in sunt accusamus sit.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...