27 Comments
 
Most Helpful

Not sure. The Sports, Media & Entertainment team seem to have done some great deals, but hard to say without seeing deal-by-deal data. You can only learn so much from the track record though. The deals that matter will happen when you're a VP / Director and the team may have changed quite a bit by then. They may also have taken on more risk to generate outsized returns, and that approach may come back to bite you. Ultimately depends how much you want to bet on yourself / your team when you get there, and you should probably re-evaluate that regularly as things change.

 

„Very lean“ basically means that you will be worked to the bone because they are not willing to hire more juniors. Should be a red flag for everyone looking for a PE exit

 

„Very lean" basically means that you will be worked to the bone because they are not willing to hire more juniors. Should be a red flag for everyone looking for a PE exit

Yes if you want to mail it in and clip a 300-350k coupon for 2 years but then enter a knife fight for a promotion. Or you grind but then have more of a glide path. 
 

But there is no free lunch 

 

They are notoriously cutthroat and sweaty, but their deal teams are lean, carry is allocated deal-by-deal, and returns have been fantastic, which means the economic upside is unmatched if you are one of the few who can survive and thrive in that type of environment.

Keep in mind that the corollary of having ‘negative carry’ is that people don’t tend to stick around for long if they get staffed on a deal that performs badly.

 

In principle, I love the idea of having carry on a deal-by-deal level. You can only affect the deals you work on and as such, the performance-based part of your compensation should be tied to those deals. On the other hand, diversification exists for a reason. Having your carry tied to 2-3 deals is extremely risky.

Moreover, as a junior employee at a PE firm, you can't really influence anything to a large extent. Not very fun when some partner decides to force through a shitty deal simply because he hasn't sourced a deal in the past 2 years and your carry gets tied to that deal specifically.

Partners in PE aren't always rational and it often comes down to pride. If they've decided to do something they will often have a great confirmation bias and an associate / VP is unlikely to speak up and tell them that their deal is actually shit. Deals that are obviously shitty can get pushed through IC too as it often comes down to how good relationships the partner has with people on the IC and if the right people on the IC owe the partner a favour.

With that said, I do think that deal-by-deal carry makes a lot of sense for partners as they have a very high level of control over the deal. However, it doesn't make sense to have deal-by-deal carry for associates / VPs because they can't really influence that much. 

 

CVC in London can be a very lucrative gig at the junior level if the deals you work on go well.

Just ask the associates on the F1/Debenhams deals who would have netted mid 7 figures in carried interest. 

Culture and hours are rough. Have heard it’s common practice to see multiple partners competing for the same deal.

 

Multiple partners within the same fund competing for the same deals? How does this work and what does that mean for the culture within the firm too, I don’t know if this is common practice within industry but that doesn’t sound great for the overall firm culture.

 

Works at Goldman Sachs

Associate 2 in PE - LBOs

Any insights on the strategic opportunities fund ? Just raised flat to previous vintage.

Longer hold, lower return target and higher quality assets and a more concentrated portfolio. Returns are solid of most recent fund and in this environment flat is the best it gets

Strategic opportunities is actually outperforming their latest flagship vintages from IRR perspective...

There is some concentration risk in the LP base. If the top 1-2 LPs pull out then the whole team is toast.

 

Associate 2 in PE - LBOs

Any insights on the strategic opportunities fund ? Just raised flat to previous vintage.

Are they hiring again?

 

Ex officiis deleniti tenetur. Consequatur possimus excepturi quidem ex ut. Culpa architecto repellendus blanditiis ipsa non. Consequuntur sunt sit voluptatem aut qui minus.

Omnis cupiditate ut necessitatibus qui quas. Quia ab pariatur occaecati laudantium placeat odio.

 

Et qui est laboriosam reprehenderit quibusdam dolore ullam. Autem vitae repellat necessitatibus non alias culpa architecto enim.

Consectetur aut tenetur tempore sequi doloribus dolore fugit. Sunt consectetur dolor modi nesciunt. Provident rerum dolor sunt totam vitae sequi tenetur.

Facere inventore exercitationem est sapiente. Aut dolorum eos quibusdam ut dolorem itaque. Consequatur facilis corporis blanditiis quisquam minus eaque soluta. Reiciendis eius iste vel soluta id delectus qui.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”