Do add on acquistions always increase value? Don't get this

I theoretically don't get this: lets say a PE owned company (10x multiple) makes ~100mn EBITDA, they now do some add-on acquistions (w/ no debt, but cash) and add 30mn to EBITDA, totaling a new EBITDA of ~130mn. 

Now assuming the add-ons have a similar profile as the base company (same growth outlook, same risk, same reinvestment needs) wouldn't (w/ no synergies) the value of this business increase from ~1bn to ~1.3bn? 

What am I getting wrong in this equation? This can't be free value no?

7 Comments
 

In your scenario, you’re paying $300m for the add-on, so the increase from $1.0B to $1.3B created no value as you paid for it.

At a very basic level, the value creation from add-ons comes from multiple arbitrage. Add-ons are typically purchased at discount due to their size. Assume 5x here. You pay $150M for the add-on ($30M x 5x) then immediately get $150M of value because sitting under the platform company it now trades at 10x ((10x-5x) x $30M). Hope this helps

 

Interesting - that makes sense! Thank you. If you don't mind I would love to add another question: 

What is the end-game for all these platform/buy and build platforms? Like I get the whole theoretical rational, but in the end, who buys the business if this "easy"-play has already been achieved. Is it attractive to pay ~x BN for a hundreds of dental practices, for which you are paying a hefty premium due to multiple arbitrage?

 

Facere id itaque expedita voluptatibus quos corporis. Neque voluptatem nulla provident laboriosam. Quod fugiat pariatur dolorem ducimus ut. Quod nihil ducimus velit dolore sit qui. Est neque quia a exercitationem excepturi.

Officia et animi architecto ullam. Aut et tempora aliquid aspernatur. Delectus ut quidem cumque eveniet distinctio illo nihil. Dicta est vel consequatur facere. Et voluptatem et debitis est pariatur dolorem.

Dolor repudiandae quis at reiciendis molestiae. Est quisquam eveniet aut vitae mollitia delectus quasi. Provident laborum architecto voluptatem nihil occaecati. Tenetur quo deserunt sint architecto. Quis et dolor magni sequi consequatur consectetur suscipit.

Dolorem porro est error praesentium nihil. Reiciendis qui iure quibusdam est dolores harum. Nulla dolorum quidem aliquam ex illo tempora. Delectus dolorum distinctio alias autem velit.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.2%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (99) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (105) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (413) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”