Getting hired at a SPAC
I got a job at a SPAC a few weeks/months ago and thought I'd share a few reflections.
- It is really lean/light. SPACs have limited working capital that they have to pay for everything (lights, market data, salaries, D&O insurance, etc.) for their search period. So you won't get the Bloomberg accounts, access to GLG, etc.
- SPAC leaders have very specific ideas in mind for who they want to hire. My SPAC was looking for juniors with X years of IB, Y years of PE, and deep deal experience in Z. They are not looking for the generalist all-around-athletes.
- They source through personal networks and luck. Going back to the lean/light, SPAC leaders don't have time or money to work with headhunters or do a broad outreach process or conduct multiple rounds of structured interviews. I saw the job ad through college alumni mailing list.
- They move fast. I had 2 interviews, a case study, and an offer in writing within a week. They also told me I had 3 days to accept it or they'd move onto the next guy. I accepted it within 3 hours. This speed translates to the deal side as well.
- The comp is very attractive. Cash comp is lower, but its more than made up with equity. You might have a reasonable debate on the risk characteristics of the equity (vesting, post-merger performance, etc.) but on paper its attractive.
- You have to be comfortable with knowing there's an end date. SPACs by definition have a limited existence, either through a merger or a liquidiation. So it's a fun ride, but it's a 2-year ride at most.
Should caveat that my shop is an "independent" SPAC, which is different from a PE-sponsored SPAC, which operate in many ways like an extension of the PE fund (and the above may or may not apply).
Pretty interesting.
Is your team structured like a typical PE deal team? Given the short lifespan, is culture non-existent / extremely cut and dry?
Yes to your first question. On the second, it's actually a lot more collaborative / a lot less toxic than IB or traditional PE because a) all of our incentives are aligned - we are here to do ONE deal, b) we already know our comp in advance, and c) it's a small team so there's no politics or internal competition (or at least way less).
Has your sponsor raised multiple SPACs?
If not, what happens to your position after the SPAC merges - do you potentially take an operational role?
My sponsor hasn't raised multiple SPACs before, but if this is successful, they will want to do another.
It's hard to have visibility into individual positions after merger.. to take an operational role means the target has to also agree, which is tough when there's no certainty of the target yet. Maybe I'll join the target, maybe I'll saddle up for the next SPAC. It could be anything. But the way I see it, Wall Street is so volatile that a "2 year job" is any less uncertain than anything else out there.
Thanks for doing this! I thought SPAC pays for the opex from the IPO proceeds? Any color on comps for mid-level professionals (say VP equivalent at a BB)? In terms of case study, is this more strategic focus given no LBO
SPAC pays opex out of risk capital, the $ the sponsor contributes, so they want to keep it as lean as possible.
Yeah, the IPO proceeds go into a trust where they can't be touched. OpEx is from risk capital out of the sponsor's pocket. Not sure I have any color on mid-level professionals as there are no VPs here. As for case study, it was minimal modeling, but just thinking of how an asset would be received by public markets and what story to tell.
Congrats. Seems like it is pretty high stakes. Would be interested to hear how your firm thinks about being really careful with the acquisition target bc you have one shot vs gotta get something done before the clock runs out?
Yeah, that's a dynamic we're seeing a lot. That's why the "quality" of the sponsor, i.e. ability to access deal flow vs. being "dumb capital" desperate get a deal, any deal, even a bad deal instead of no deal, matters.
Thanks for sharing! I’ve been wondering about this for a while whether SPACs will become an alternative exit path from IB.
If it does, it will be few and far between and one-off, due to the fact that SPACs are run lean and light and don't have the time/energy/resources to get into the headhunter cottage industry that normally recruit out of IB.
What's your role after you find a target and de-SPAC to become a normal publicly-traded opco? Like if your SPAC found a target next month would you be out of a job or is there a plan to place you within the PF org? Interested because this is the fist time I've heard of an "independent" SPAC hiring for this role given they'd typically hire bankers for the search / execution process
Impossible to tell without knowing what the target is ahead of time, because the target has to agree to to take you on as an employee. But if we found a target next month and I'm out of a job.. well.. I still have 2 years worth of pay for 3 months of work :-D.
Wait to your last point, you're saying that you'll continue to be paid for 2 years regardless of the outcome??
What kind of background do you come from (IB, PE, something else)? I always wondered what the day to day difference is like between working specifically on a SPAC deal and a PE deal. If you cant, would you be able to elaborate on that?
I’m in PE and can’t stand the amount detail that goes into every bit of financial modeling (aka my whole job).
BUMP. Would be curious as well. Have seen headhunters ramp up their SPAC search and have been thinking about recruiting for SPACs
How are potential SPAC opportunities sourced? Is it via the same way prospective opportunities within PE are sourced (bankers, lawyers, proprietary, etc.)?
Exact same, except I'd say the deal opptys presented by bankers are materially worse that sourcing for PE.
Do you agree incentive are structured so it’s better to do a deal vs doing a good deal? Certainly feels that way.. especially w all the money behind it now.
I also wasn’t aware that there were so many billion dollar unicorns hah.
Lol anyone willing to write a check can create a unicorn. I’ll start an LLC with a billion units tomorrow and sell you one for $1... boom we’re in the club
What is a reasonable range of stock comp for associates in a SPAC?
Quibusdam molestiae quia reprehenderit est ab repellendus ratione. Officiis cupiditate ut neque sed autem aliquid. Dolore sequi optio dignissimos consequatur quod laudantium temporibus. Corporis tempore perspiciatis qui aut explicabo ut temporibus. Expedita ab cumque facilis. Explicabo laudantium facere delectus quas nihil. Nisi omnis et sapiente ducimus ut velit voluptas.
Sit id incidunt voluptatem alias architecto accusantium optio. Nisi eos voluptates dolor voluptatibus. Aperiam sed voluptatem quibusdam voluptate. Dolor perspiciatis est saepe. Dicta aliquid aperiam reprehenderit sunt quibusdam ea hic. Dolore et quod temporibus ratione doloremque vel. Voluptate provident pariatur natus.
Accusantium quaerat natus nam exercitationem est. Quis et provident modi perferendis quis quod et. Voluptatem sit fugit hic eos consectetur ab. Tempora quasi qui nobis consequatur laboriosam et voluptatem.
Quibusdam dolor enim aspernatur in incidunt. Ut qui nostrum dolores fugiat. Voluptatem saepe et perspiciatis magni quaerat.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Et quia laborum sunt. Vel sunt pariatur eos. Tempore sapiente sunt excepturi cum aut non veniam.
Reprehenderit fuga non qui dolor blanditiis asperiores praesentium. Corrupti quis sunt ipsa mollitia. Sed rerum nobis aut rerum quos suscipit incidunt. Quo sit possimus aut quis eaque. Molestiae voluptatem ipsam ullam quaerat.
Voluptas omnis consequatur incidunt sit. Dolore ut ratione placeat molestiae nostrum quis. Consequatur a qui et.