Has PE been good for you / better than IB?
There’s a lot of discussions on here how PE is worse than banking (or at least the same) but with higher stress hours.
Does anyone feel it’s more intellectually stimulating than banking, better wlb, or just glad they made the switch over?
From what I've seen it's completely dependent on your firm. PE has been 100x better than banking for me. Better pay, better hours, more interesting work, better team... I also have friends who's firms completely railed them worse than IB and they went back lol
That’s great to hear! Approx what size is your fund and was there anything you noticed in the recruitment process that suggested better culture / hours?
~$2bn. Hours no, people yes. Frankly the guys o interviewed with were just super "normal" dudes. You could just tell they weren't assholes or hardos all the way up to the partner level. I'm in a T3 city so non-NY which I think tends to be chiller.
No
I am in London MM.
For me - overall yes
Downsides are:
Can I PM about MM recruiting in London?
Sure!
Just curious about your role as an investment manager in PE. Do you also do financial models? How is your role different compared to that of an analyst/associate?
Oh yeah, it's just the title in London MM - I have changed it now lol to Assist VP - because it's basically Senior Associate.
But yeah, its basically the same as Associate / Senior Associate.
Yes
Can I PM you need info on eqt
Do you work on the infra side by any chance?
Having done a few internships in PE and having multiple friends in PE, the general experience seems to be that life is better if you move to a MM fund. Hours are often better, work is interesting as you get to be very involved in all aspects of a deal / business, and often more relaxed environment. Meanwhile, most of my friends who have moved to US MFs have been very disappointed. Hours have been as rough as banking but with much higher responsibility, work has not been very interested and quite similar to banking but much more technically heavy, and people often consist of the worst hardos from IB.
Initially - yes:
- Work is more interesting
- Base pay is slightly lower but bonuses are less volatile
- Hours are better
However, sometimes I think that all the trouble with recruiting and worrying about career progression / etc wasn't worth it.
Especially when I see how (comparatively) easy it is to progress in banking up until DIR.
Maybe the people who stay in banking and optimize for WLB are the smartest bunch?
Do you mine asking. are you speaking from experience in Europe or US?
It's a more interesting job than banking and I think good to try, but it was not better for me. Hours weren't as bad and comp was roughly the same, but the culture of my firm was far worse and the overall stress of the PE job was way worse than IB.
After holding out hope that PE would be better than IB for 2 years, to find it's a pretty similar experience (save for maybe 10% less hours a week) shocked me pretty hard. I went to a pretty sweaty shop and think that burned me out a bit faster than expected, but it was not the improvement I expected.
All other things equal it's a (slightly?) better experience than banking, but not good enough for me to get comfortable in the lifestyle. Hope that helps.
Appreciate the insight, assuming you are in corpdev from title – was better wlb / decreased stress the main factor in your decision to leave pe?
Et et dolorem quidem non. Expedita dolorem aliquam dignissimos et sapiente. Occaecati ut perspiciatis aut.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...