HIG Capital Reputation?

Hi everyone - I know HIG has a bit of a scummy reputation but it seems like they've cleaned up their act in recent years. Anyone have thoughts on them going forward? Would a couple of years there be viewed as a black mark on your resume?

 

"Would a couple of years there be viewed as a black mark on your resume?" As in, recruiting for other PE roles (second associate stint post-MBA) will be harder?

 

Absolutely not. As others have commented, HIG is a very solid UMM shop that has a negative reputation for being a sweatshop and bidding very low for assets. You likely still need to be at a BB or EB to get an offer.

 

Nope. Multiple people from MMs have gone on to be successful associates there.

 

It's a reputable PE firm? OP makes it sound like it'll hurt a resume

 

No denying HIG is a successful firm, but they have such a widespread reputation for low balling bids, retrading post-LOI, grinding their junior folks that I'm worried there's a stigma of sorts if you ever try to lateral somewhere else. I'm sure it's not a big deal at the associate level, but post-MBA I feel like people begin to associate you with your firm's brand and it may make movement more difficult than it otherwise would be.

I have no first hand experience in this at all, but it seems like I've heard jokes about HIG at all levels of my career.

 

@Shaino can you comment on how much carry you get as an associate and VP?

 
Most Helpful

Have been in high finance for 15 years and know plenty of people older/peers/younger than I that have gone through HIG. Can attest Shaino anyone who can make it through HIG is a G. They have IMO a great carry program, even at the entry associate level, which some of my peers are still clipping coups off of 10+ years out. Frankly I wish my PE program offered the same. Returns are top decile. You know who else are bottom-feeders? Apollo, Platinum, CD&R. If you don't know the the basic LBO math between entry and exit mult than you don't belong in PE to begin with. The better question to ask is how are they able to get these awesome entry mults in a mature and saturated industry that is PE....

 

Lmao at bottom feeder label dude. I work at one of the funds mentioned here at that connotation is almost exclusively used by senior bankers (in my exp) who will often falter on targeted or even broadly-marketed sell-side processes and get pissed when their shitty client doesn't demand an 8x+ ebitda multiple for a company / industry going to shit. When I was a first year it always puzzled me that bankers were confused as to why a shitty company or asset wasn't fetching a higher value with sponsors , especially value-oriented guys like Apo or Plat. But alas the sellside fees and incentives will always drive senior bankers to the point of irrationality until they discuss a deal that isn't theirs... then they have plenty of opinions as to why their MD colleague isn't able to fetch or eek out real value from his deal

 

These guys should do themselves a favor and get off Gobuyside and instead go fully internal or use a respectable head hunter.

I have no doubt it’s a great firm, but there is something off-putting about getting 15 emails from Gobuyside in a year for HIG roles.

Edit: went back and did a filter in my email. Have 30 emails from them over the last 3-4 years for HIG opportunities (across different funds / strategies / locations). So not 15 a year but still a very large number.

 

I just joined HIG as an Associate and think their recruiting process is quite on point. Found the process quite meritocratic given the steps are fair for all - Round 1 Interview, Round 2 Modeling Test, etc. Unlike some other firms which will only interview candidates from three groups at three firms or have some candidates skip ahead of the process based on superficial data. I'm biased joining out of a non-NYC office and lesser known boutique bank. Yes, on HIG having used GoBuyside for a while and handling internally - I was fine with that given the point above on consistency (I did well on the GAT Test which I think got me a look). I know GoBuyside has a search practice that HIG will use for more senior level hires as well as needed given its much more expensive. On the broader points about culture, bottom-feeding and all that - your investing your time to learn a skill-set. HIG puts up the returns so I dont understand why anyone wouldnt want to see hows it is done earlier in their career. From there, you can always pivot to targeting a better lifestyle or whatever. I do think there is value in seeing how you can "grind or sweatshop" out an extra 2 to 3 points on your IRR. Something you may not get at a firm that is less transactional and more focused on leveraging Partner's networks to generate great deal flow - not sure how much value you accrue as an Associate here as you dont personally benefit anything skill wise.

 

Life is short seems like a pretty weak argument for not spending a couple years with your head down working hard.  Assuming you're in the US average life expectancy is ~78 years, so we'll pretend the tutorial years don't count and you're left with 60.  So it's not worth it to work extra hard for ~5% of that time (~8.5% if we're saying 2 banking + 3 PE) to ideally position yourself for the remainder?  Some people are more career oriented and realize that if they're willing to invest more of their time earlier in their career, it will compound more meaningfully down the line.  Investing a few brutal years of work in your 20s can be the scale tipper that makes you worth a million or two by the time you're in your early-mid 30s (saving & spending habits obv taken into account).  You work in consulting so it's probably safe to say you value work/life balance more than say someone who targeted banking.  There's nothing wrong with that, in fact I'm sure there are plenty of nights the banker wonders if it would've been smarter to go your route.  But clearly you have separate goals for yourself vs someone who chose the IB -> PE path (same here, hence Corp Dev).

"The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly" - Robert A. Wilson | "If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

I know a few people that worked there and most of the rumors are true; put in fake bids to get into processes then always looking to cut price no matter what, sweatshop at the associate and vp levels (associates are paid well below market), do a ton of work on every deal only to find out their committee hates it after months of work, etc. That being said, they all say they developed a great skillset and learned a ton that they can take elsewhere.

 

Any recent color on the culture at Middle Market specifically (which has a $3bn fund size, i.e. larger than the flagship LBO fund)? The Middle Market team appear to have a ton of VPs and Associates and not that many MDs and Principals. Good portion of the group is in NYC, with smaller offices in SF and Miami apparently.

Is HIG the kind of place where it's not great being an Associate or VP, but if you wait it out and get the Principal promotion it becomes more of a cushy gig because at that point you have two people working underneath you who can handle a lot of the grunt / less interesting work and as a result the hours improve materially?

 

Solid UMM PE shop with 1) top tier returns, 2) pay of a MM PE shop, 3) hours worked of MF PE. Overall great reputation among PE firms

 

Stingy , sweaty , and just overall low tenure of investment professionals . Look on linkedin and see for yourself. They don't treat juniors well based on two associates who have since left the firm. Can kind of tell given they don't have juniors on a team page like most funds of this tier do. Hard Pass

 

Facilis ut esse maxime ullam. Corporis quos excepturi ut accusamus doloribus sed placeat. Cupiditate ab dignissimos sequi dolorem maxime adipisci.

Quas voluptatem nam animi. Voluptatem voluptatem eos laboriosam quos eum dolorem excepturi. Labore nobis unde repudiandae at vero labore aut pariatur. Est eum deserunt error nihil. Nesciunt cumque magnam tempora qui accusamus aut soluta.

 

Animi vitae ad autem vero. Nesciunt et consequatur omnis modi necessitatibus earum architecto. Eligendi error id optio sequi in ut debitis. Qui quo at aut totam nihil reprehenderit. A consequatur tempora eveniet rem aspernatur.

Omnis vero reprehenderit dolor eos aut. Sit cumque corporis quibusdam atque sed sit autem. Id corporis distinctio in aut quaerat inventore aliquam.

Iste perferendis et expedita vel error ut molestiae. In qui ad quam animi tempore. Repellendus voluptatibus et cum repudiandae aliquam nostrum expedita.

Repudiandae quia dolore voluptatem voluptas molestiae. Sint dicta ipsum excepturi qui occaecati facilis.

 

Vitae similique vitae fuga et aliquam consequatur aut. Necessitatibus tempora est qui aut voluptas hic ratione architecto. Omnis ducimus impedit nisi sit fugiat ut.

Ab sequi ut similique et. Facilis veniam eligendi expedita vitae facilis aut esse. Sit nihil eum ipsam non sit vel qui voluptatem. Ullam ut ut vero sint dolor qui quae. Debitis quod maxime quidem ut.

Et itaque doloremque ut qui nobis at ipsam possimus. Impedit et iusto qui molestiae minus. Omnis sunt aut ea dolorem sit. Sed consequatur voluptas enim pariatur qui amet. Nemo consequuntur numquam fugit quia.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (90) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (205) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”