High Gross-to-Net Erosion | Key elements
The other day I was checking a GP, and noticed that one of the latest vintages displayed a lower Gross-to-Net erosion compared to initial vintages (which does not make much sense at first sight).
So far, I would expect latest vintage to display wider gap compared to previous.
I believe the following factor may impact the gap:
Management fees and capital calls (bridge financing as well) and carried interest/
Also, noticed the fund terms changed slightly - Catch-up was 100% in initial vintages, whereas now is 50%. Would this have a strong impact?
Keen to hear your views / opinion.
Yes, a reduction to 50% catch up would improve the net IRR as more of the earlier cash flows (vs 100%) flow to the LP.
Understood. Therefore, the 100% catch-up in earlier vintages contributed to a larger Gross-to-net erosion from the LP perspective.
Aliquid deleniti occaecati eius qui quas minus enim. In autem reprehenderit et est iusto non.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...