How important is MF vs UMM vs MM for raising your own fund in the future.

I've heard that LPs will want to see that name brand. I've also heard that it could be easier at a mm due to more facetime with LPs. Others have said it doesn't matter either way. What matters is what deals you lead and the return rate on them. What's the truth? Should you go to a MF or solid MM??

 

When considering the importance of working at a megafund (MF) versus an upper-middle-market (UMM) or middle-market (MM) fund for the purpose of eventually raising your own fund, several factors come into play:

  1. Brand Recognition and Track Record: Working at a well-known MF can provide significant brand recognition, which can be appealing to limited partners (LPs) when you're looking to raise your own fund. The prestige associated with MFs often carries weight in the industry.

  2. Experience and Deal Exposure: At a MM or UMM, you might have the opportunity for more hands-on experience and closer interactions with LPs, which can be beneficial for building relationships and understanding the intricacies of fund management. This experience can be crucial when you start your own fund.

  3. Performance Metrics: Ultimately, the success of previous deals you've led and the returns you've generated are critical. LPs will look closely at your track record to assess your capability in managing a fund and generating returns. This factor is often seen as more important than the size of the fund you previously worked with.

  4. Personal Network and Reputation: Building a strong personal network within the industry and a solid reputation for your investment acumen and ethical standards can also play a significant role in successfully raising a fund, regardless of whether you come from a MF, UMM, or MM.

In conclusion, while the prestige of a MF can provide initial credibility, the experience gained at a MM or UMM, along with a strong track record and personal industry connections, are equally, if not more, important. Your decision should align with where you believe you can gain the best experience, grow your network, and showcase your investment skills effectively.

Sources: William Blair Reputation/Top Groups/Exit Ops?, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/private-equity/then-and-now-compbanker?customgpt=1, Q&A 2.0: 3rd Year BA/A/AC At MBB Going To UMM/MF This Summer, LO to MM HF?, Q&A: UMM PE VP

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

It probably depends on how much you want to raise, your strategy and check size. If you want to raise a 1.5b first time fund that invest in 500m companies like some Apollo spin off do then thats going to be hard from a 3.0b AUM MM firm. If you want to raise a 500mm fund that invests in 100-200m EV portCos and then scale it, coming from a well performing and reputable MM won't hurt you much.

Most important is the returns on your past investment, how you differentiate your strategy, and if your past fund is reputable/known. Also I don't really know what i am taking about, I've just thought about it a bit aswell.

 

You see this is exactly what I think and I have a feeling we are right. But we both want the approval of someone who's farther up the chain. I feel like it's 60% my track record 30% my LP relationship and 10% my previous employment/educational record. If any people higher up in Finance could confirm this would be extremely thankfull.

 

How much do LPs care about your own capital commitment to new fund? Assume easier to raise money if you are putting in $100mm after crushing it at Apollo or a big UMM that hits it big 

 
Most Helpful

Aperiam minima sit non expedita deserunt aliquam recusandae. Voluptatem praesentium delectus assumenda nostrum voluptatem molestias tempore. Qui distinctio delectus delectus nostrum harum et. Hic ducimus labore esse fuga dolorem beatae sint voluptatem. Voluptate delectus est molestias dolorum.

Qui nam amet fuga ut ea id. Sequi nobis amet consequuntur. Tempore pariatur placeat rerum at aliquam sapiente blanditiis. Voluptatibus iure mollitia fuga eveniet.

Porro maxime culpa facere. Nobis eveniet qui dolorem beatae. Eligendi commodi et sed laboriosam vero totam.

Porro expedita nesciunt quam officia temporibus. Accusamus voluptas possimus nemo quibusdam repellendus. Perferendis et pariatur fugit possimus libero quidem quod. Hic et rem enim voluptas rerum id est.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (389) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (316) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”