IB to FoF/Co-Invest to PE ?

So I have a background in IB and considering an offer within a renowned FOF & co-invest team. 

Would it be hurtful to my career going there for 1 year if I then plan on going to PE or GE ?

People say you don't build the skillset, but thinking it wouldn't hurt getting some co-invest experience. Most of the work on IB is building useless decks, market updates and doing comps and jumping on status update calls. Thinking that adding a year or so of co-invest where I would actually focus on doing some buyside DD & modelling could be useful. Although unclear how the FoF angle will help.

Any thoughts?

13 Comments
 

Based on the most helpful WSO content, transitioning from IB to a FoF/Co-Invest role for a year and then aiming for PE or GE can be a strategic move, but it comes with trade-offs. Here's what you need to consider:

  1. Skillset Development:

    • Co-investment roles can provide valuable exposure to buyside due diligence and modeling, which are directly relevant to PE. This could be a step up from the more process-driven tasks in IB, like building decks and comps.
    • However, the FoF aspect might not add as much value for a direct PE transition, as it is often seen as less technical and more qualitative. The transferable skills from FoF are limited compared to direct investing roles.
  2. Perception in PE Recruiting:

    • While co-investment experience is a plus, spending time in a FoF role might raise questions during PE interviews. Recruiters may perceive it as a deviation from the traditional IB-to-PE path, especially if the FoF work is heavily focused on fund allocation rather than direct deal involvement.
    • You’ll need to craft a strong narrative to explain why you made the move and how it aligns with your long-term goals in PE or GE.
  3. Exit Opportunities:

    • Co-investment experience can be a bridge to PE, especially if you gain hands-on exposure to underwriting and deal evaluation. However, moving from a FoF-heavy role to PE might be more challenging, as FoF work is often considered less relevant to direct investing.
    • If your goal is PE, prioritize roles within the FoF/Co-Invest team that emphasize co-investments over primary fund investments.
  4. Timeframe Consideration:

    • Spending just one year in a FoF/Co-Invest role might limit the depth of experience you can gain. PE recruiters typically value candidates who have demonstrated meaningful contributions in their previous roles.
  5. Alternative Paths:

    • If you’re set on PE or GE, consider whether staying in IB for another year or pursuing a direct investing role might be a more straightforward path. Alternatively, a FoF/Co-Invest role with a strong co-investment focus could still be a stepping stone if you position yourself well.

In summary, a year in a FoF/Co-Invest role could be beneficial if you focus on co-investments and gain tangible buyside experience. However, you’ll need to be strategic about how you present this experience to PE recruiters and ensure it aligns with your long-term goals.

Sources: Direct Invest to FoF/Co-Invest?, Q&A: 1st year FoF Infrastructure at Buyside, Q&A: 1st year FoF Infrastructure at Buyside, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/asset-management/qa-current-analyst-at-20bn-hedge-fof?customgpt=1, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/asset-management/qa-current-analyst-at-20bn-hedge-fof?customgpt=1

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

I did 1 year of IB before spending the last 2 in a co invest seat. We don’t do primaries, just co invest and single asset CVs. 

Personally, I think I learned tremendously more here. Being in the co invest seat also exposes you to a wide variety of PE strategies. 

However, I think most headhunters just want to see the cookie cutter 2 years IB background and may be hesitant to give credit for co invest work. Not really sure as I haven’t been active recruiting. I am considering the jump to secondaries, but am trying to optimize for career track roles.

 

Honestly you will probably be ‘stuck’ in the industry for the foreseeable future and yes everything is very superficial for the coinvests. My hours are varied since I work within a group which also does Secondaries but it’s around ~60 a week.

 
Most Helpful

Short answer having done this myself is that going from FoF to direct PE is one of the most challenging uphill battles you can engage in.

Headhunters don’t know what to do with you (why pitch an “untraditional” candidate over a GS associate) and GPs don’t take you seriously because they work with co-investors and know exactly that you leverage their work at best or are a pain in the butt with stupid questions at worst (to justify to your LPs the hefty fees you charge for not doing a lot).

It’s a useful seat to see the PE landscape at large but it’s like a zoo (imperfect analogy but illustrates the point) in the sense that you can observe the lions and throw a steak but that doesn’t mean you can switch sides and join the pack after. Avoid unless you’re happy to live the LP life forever potentially (nothing wrong if you do btw but you need to know that). 

 

Main pushback is that larger funds only look at pedigreed backgrounds and LPs are not in that bucket, so your CV automatically goes to the bin (remember that FoF is generally the exit from the exit to WLB land). Once you get into the process, HHs and the GPs just don’t believe that you have experience running independent DD nor have any modeling experience to speak of since joining an LP. You basically start the game on your own 1 yard line which kills you in this competitive environment. 

I was able to land a spot at a strong shop because I put blood, sweat, and tears into it for over a year and had people pulling for me. 

 

Sapiente et placeat ea in possimus ut. Explicabo quia dolorem quia et quaerat cumque nesciunt. Molestias ipsum dolor quidem veniam architecto quasi quo non.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (352) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”