Liquid Credit / Leveraged Loans / High Yield Groups

Figured I'd start a thread on this since there are only a few others on this topic and these types of groups don't seem to be too popular. But have done research into / networked with some of the notable liquid credit groups (think Ares, Blackstone, KKR, Bain Capital Credit, Carlyle, Apollo). Seems to be like this is this one of the best spots to be but it isn't as popular as private equity, hedge funds, private credit, or even investment banking. This is despite what seems to be similar comp (at least for summer analysts and analysts), significantly less hours (depends on group but seems like max at most for analysts is around 60 per week since its market based), and solid exit opps (distressed hf, credit hf, levfin sell side, l/s equities hf, or lower level / mid market PE). Unless you want to go Megafund PE (even though you're already there if you care about prestige), you have great work-life balance and even a moderate decrease in comp would be 100% worth it considering hours. Just wanted to see if what I'm saying is too good to be true or if anyone else agrees? 

 

Used to work in one of the groups mentioned. Every shop is structured a little differently, but generally it is a pretty good gig from WLB adjusted comp perspective. You can clear into the high 6 figures as you get senior, on par with direct lending. Very tight band in comp as performance is not a huge driver, but rather AUM. You invest in coupon clipping assets, you get coupon clipping comp. This is good from predictability perspective, not so much for meritocracy. This is actually very similar dynamic as direct lending btw, it’s a very similar asset class. At multi fund platforms like BX, KKR, Carlyle, etc, you work across direct lending and liquid very often. You can do strictly 8am-6pm with zero weekend work if you are efficient. Very little fire drills as new issue calendar (40% of work) and quarterly earnings (another 40%) schedule are on highly predictable timeline. This is a bit different from dedicated direct lending team culture in that deal timelines are more compressed and you effectively are client service to the PE sponsor, so creates more fire drills a la IB. Generally you get personalities that value the WLB a lot more and less hardo/hyper-ambitious in liquid credit/direct lending compared to PE/HF. Overall very similar to LO AM, except people tend to be less cerebral than strong equity teams in LO.

The issue is that if you start in these groups as a junior/mid level, your learning gets stunted pretty quickly and work just gets repetitive and boring. I’d say this is a better gig to settle into in your later career after going out and seeing more high intensity investing strategies like distressed or HF, and you decide that you’re OK not trying to be the next Dan Loeb or Paul Singer. Which is a perfectly fine conclusion to come to. Your life is very good getting out at 6pm every day and clearing 600-700k with minimal performance stress. The occasional right place, right time people will progress to PM or Director of Research type job that can clear low 7 figs (but job gets a bit more intense and there is moderately higher performance pressure)

 
Most Helpful

It is very doable. I have since exited to a special situation and seen plenty others do it. I was even a bit older than you when exiting. 
First priority is to master what you are working on - basic credit analysis, setting up credit and cap structure models, passable level of covenant knowledge, and generally who the players are. Ultimately good business analysis is the same regardless of specific strategy. Learn how to form an opinion on good biz vs. bad biz and how to model and value different sectors. 
Your first 1-2 years should be spent just doing this. I wouldn’t worry too much about exiting just yet as you’ll have been learning the exact same basics no matter which strategy you’re in. Once you have a handle on this, start using your existing firm’s resources to follow what’s going on in the distressed/special sits markets. If there is a funky structure or corporate event, follow it closely and try to understand why those things are happening. As you gain more trust, you should be able to position yourself as someone who is aggressive and willing to take a look at hairy situations. Ask to get staffed on workouts and problem credits/sectors. Do your own work and pitch them to whoever will listen in your team. Start building a network with other investors involved in those situations. This is not easy but also doable as your internal competition at these firms generally don’t care to raise their own hands for this stuff, many of them will be happy to let you do the work. 
Then within first 5 years, I would look to make a move. This is the sweet spot where you’re viewed as still moldable and hungry, but also have the basics covered. Go through case studies/pitches with weaker firms first so that you get some reps. You might inevitably embarrass yourself on the first one because you just don’t know what you don’t know. Ask for feedback and learn from each rep. Always have a long and a short pitch ready to go, which must be actionable today. Know the details of interesting credits you’ve worked on in current seat. Keep working until you find a great fund with strategy that aligns with your thinking and strong investment culture. Don’t worry about comp yet if this comes with a slight cut (possible if going to small, nimble HF vs. pretty good entry pay at Mega Fund Liquid Credit). But trust me you are expanding your career earnings potential when you do this, even if it feels like leaving a safe, big name behind. Do not fall into the trap of considering yourself a “KKR/BX guy” or something like that - too many people I’ve seen in these mediocre liquid credit seats don’t face reality by telling themselves this until too late, this is not good. But also be selective in where you go next and be patient if the opportunity doesn’t check 80% of boxes (ex comp). Ideally you want to focus on learning at the next seat for at least 3-5 years (or forever), not prepping for another exit

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (388) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (315) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”