MF vs MM PC Interview
What differentiates MM PC interviews vs say the PC arm of a traditional MF? Are the interviews significantly more difficult/technical? If so, can someone please shed light on the unexpected technical/difficult questions? If not, is it just a case of a stream of "higher quality candidates" (i.e. only recruit from "well-known" IB or other PC gigs)?
Any differences in the model/case studies?
What helped you stand out during your interview process? Was it that you answered the basic questions extremely well or got the right answer for some of the more difficult questions (which once again, what do these entail)?
Trying to understand why it is harder to land roles at bigger / more well established firms versus smaller ones (beyond the fact that there's more competition because these positions are more coveted - at the end of the day, we can control our performance, to a degree, can't control the competition or the outcome)
Following
Bump
Omnis tempora repellat ipsam ut voluptas dignissimos et voluptates. Est omnis aperiam et at sed illo maxime. Est in quos qui repudiandae iusto magni facere. Quod sit vitae optio fugiat.
Et odit enim error. Enim illum quia dicta sapiente rerum veritatis. Accusantium facilis error quis voluptatem voluptas. Velit voluptatibus voluptatum recusandae omnis nisi modi. Occaecati autem maxime similique itaque officia.
Sit esse dolor qui ducimus nostrum velit. Odio sed magnam sunt recusandae sit amet. Voluptas neque pariatur ipsum sapiente. Culpa architecto iste odit repellendus quia sed.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...