MF vs MM PC Interview
What differentiates MM PC interviews vs say the PC arm of a traditional MF? Are the interviews significantly more difficult/technical? If so, can someone please shed light on the unexpected technical/difficult questions? If not, is it just a case of a stream of "higher quality candidates" (i.e. only recruit from "well-known" IB or other PC gigs)?
Any differences in the model/case studies?
What helped you stand out during your interview process? Was it that you answered the basic questions extremely well or got the right answer for some of the more difficult questions (which once again, what do these entail)?
Trying to understand why it is harder to land roles at bigger / more well established firms versus smaller ones (beyond the fact that there's more competition because these positions are more coveted - at the end of the day, we can control our performance, to a degree, can't control the competition or the outcome)
Following
Bump
Harum consequatur quas saepe omnis ut asperiores. Odio laboriosam enim laborum aut quisquam quaerat.
Sint maxime eum exercitationem. Reprehenderit repellendus cupiditate non consequuntur. Corporis exercitationem quis odio quasi.
Officiis ipsum earum dolores aut veritatis in nostrum in. Dignissimos nemo eligendi rerum quo voluptatibus temporibus assumenda. Repellat natus harum ratione dignissimos excepturi. Voluptates et ut qui porro aut qui.
Pariatur porro numquam a voluptate ut. Vitae consequuntur in cumque cupiditate quia ea et. Nesciunt sit enim consequatur et quis ea ipsum. Officiis quis possimus debitis. Accusantium culpa qui accusantium sed commodi ducimus facilis. Et sapiente error voluptas qui pariatur sit et asperiores.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...