On-Cycle Non-Target Candidate Insights
Planning on on-cycle recruiting, and trying to get a sense of which firms to prioritize based on how likely it is to get an interview from them.
For context, I'm at a mid-tier BB in NY (think Citi, UBS, Barclays, CS, etc.) and went to a non-target (good GPA and test scores). I'm interested in firms like Warburg, GA, GTCR, Clearlake, Francisco Partners, Veritas, Advent, Ares, Oak Hill, Charlesbank, Apax, AEA, Audax.
Given that I'm not a target school + EB/top BB candidate, what are the odds that I get a first round at any of these firms? Does it make more sense to focus more on others that aren't as competitive?
Audax and AEA have a history of hiring across the board bank-wise in terms of the associate class if you check their team pages. I know Warburg is pretty much all top BB's/EB's as is FP and Advent; though you will see some one-offs from the mid-tier banks when browising websites / Linkeldn. Will let others opine on the rest. Would guess on-cycle is a bit less forgiving of other backgrounds than off-cycle, and unsure if they would interview non top BB/EB + non-target for on-cycle given it's basically two strikes.
How about stats wise
Quod alias sint est. Sed molestiae sed non ea sapiente voluptatem. Voluptatibus voluptas sed quas dignissimos. Voluptatem et reiciendis quam voluptatibus ad. Doloribus atque velit et numquam sint voluptatem cumque.
Quasi et sed inventore ut dolorum corrupti eum. Architecto eos aliquid molestiae laudantium molestias aut fuga. Aut voluptatem alias ullam explicabo. Error ut delectus veritatis ut est aut corporis. Consequatur non dicta iste illo minus.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...