PE Co-Investment Analysis
For people that do private equity co-investments alongside General Partners, what does your analysis tend to focus on? Do you tend to create your own models or are you modifying assumptions and casing the GP's model?
For people that do private equity co-investments alongside General Partners, what does your analysis tend to focus on? Do you tend to create your own models or are you modifying assumptions and casing the GP's model?
| +214 | London MF REPE is paradise | 10 | 17h |
| +34 | The Difference Between a Good Business and a Good Acquisition | 7 | 3d |
| +20 | My Work Products Get 95% There, is that a failure or somewhat expected? | 13 | 23h |
| +18 | Career / Life Crossroads | 5 | 2d |
| +14 | Opinions on DTCP? | 5 | 1d |
| +14 | Partners misalignmet common? | 4 | 4d |
| +11 | on-cycle possible after lateraling? | 2 | 2d |
| +10 | PE Associate Recruiting from a PE Analyst Program | 3 | 2d |
| +9 | Why India’s SME Market Is Getting More Interesting | 3 | 1d |
| +9 | Pulling off Pivoting out of infra | 1 | 7h |
Career Resources
Hey neil91, the following topics might be helpful:
Fingers crossed that one of those helps you.
Modifying GP assumptions. Sometimes if we feel a certain part isn't detailed enough we would break the model and insert our own assumptions. For example, if management only takes into account growth capex, we would make an assessment of maintenance capex and factor that into the model.
The bulk of the analysis focuses on stress testing the assumptions. How silly can your assumptions be that still gets you to your desired returns. For example, if the company has been well over industry growth rates. If you just assumed it grew at market rates and be able to get to your returns, then it is an easy sell at the IC. I had one case where because of the structuring and low entry multiples, we could assume the company growth declines and we could hit our targeted returns, another very easy sell.
Yeah, my team usually takes the base GP model and then we’ll diligence all the inputs and assumptions and tweak them as needed. Lots of building in different cases - GP case vs our baseline, upside, and downside cases.
You’re absolutely right we will break the model and insert our own more complex builds for things as needed. Always layer on LP returns on top of course.
Thanks guys. How do you then monitor your co-invest positions? Do you get quarterly reports from the portfolio companies? Also, if a platform company makes an add-on acquisition, will you then update your model?
At my fund we get quarterly reports from the GP.
And yes, if there is an add-on acquisition, we will get a revised financial model from the GP and re-perform our analysis. But our analysis certainly wouldn't be as detailed as when we first invested in the company.
Dignissimos quos sunt similique quis libero a sapiente. Excepturi quidem debitis sunt eveniet. Necessitatibus officia deleniti quo quia eum quas fugit.
Veniam est et ullam nesciunt velit dicta dolor. Veritatis saepe et sit eaque. Doloribus voluptates et nostrum ipsum et molestias beatae vel. Delectus sit harum ut error excepturi tempora. Deserunt eum sint placeat quidem velit.
Ducimus quia sit consequatur quae impedit. Maiores modi odio aliquid repellat eum et aut sint. Commodi repellendus officia saepe non sed ut voluptas occaecati.
Voluptatem nihil reiciendis aperiam necessitatibus velit. Labore nulla beatae aperiam nulla. Expedita tempore porro nesciunt et mollitia id. Ut blanditiis maiores eos et. Voluptate enim consequuntur et vitae et et iusto.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...