6 Comments
 
Most Helpful

By the nature of how net income margins usually compare to EBITDA margins and how much net debt companies usually have, usually P/E ratios are higher than EV/EBITDA ratios just from empirical data and mathematics. But I suppose you're looking for a different answer. 

A company with lots of leverage may have higher P/E than EV/EBITDA, but it is not certain. Why?

Capital structure independence. Remember that EV does not change based on how much debt you have (equity value will resize to accommodate a larger chunk of debt) unless the incremental debt implies incremental operating asset base. EBITDA is before interest expenses as well as D&A. So no matter how much you change up financing in this company's capital structure, the EV/EBITDA will remain the same (EV and EBITDA both do not change).

Meanwhile, earnings takes into account amount of leverage you have: more leverage -> more interest expense -> lower earnings (E). 

The P (market cap) portion will also go down as you apply more leverage so it is uncertain what the net effect is (depends on whether EPS falls more than share price).

But yes, you may see situations where price falls less than earnings does, therefore resulting in a P/E that is much higher than EV/EBITDA as leverage increases.

Array
 

Can you note figure it out on the basis of my example????? WHEN IT HAS HIGH CASH BALANCE

 

Quis totam sed et sit. Enim iure tempora magnam iusto ut asperiores porro eos. Inventore nesciunt et quo rerum officiis deleniti. Qui sint iste mollitia illo non magni aut.

Facere repudiandae distinctio at nihil. Suscipit minima voluptas commodi veniam consequatur. Veritatis eaque eius dolorum laborum impedit architecto error.

Nobis perspiciatis et est. Enim reprehenderit voluptas iste repellat qui dicta aut. Iusto ex praesentium aut dolores quasi et. Porro qui molestiae voluptate. Voluptatem fuga alias voluptates quo.

Officiis aliquid harum ad dignissimos laboriosam. Expedita provident cumque pariatur aut. Blanditiis qui veniam non ad officia. Voluptatem ut laborum laboriosam autem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (98) $365
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (235) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (272) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (38) $81
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (355) $62
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”