Private Equity By Name - But No Fund?

I am interviewing with a regional firm that shows up under private equity in searches, on linkedin, and other sources. However, they call themselves a "private investment firm" and there is no fund. It looks like they maybe borrow on a line of credit to acquire companies and in the phone interview they said they have never had a dollar of equity (not sure what that means).

Has anyone ever heard of this? It seems like standard PE by name with portfolio companies, distressed debt, and LBOs. Do any other firms use this type of model or know what is going on here?

Thanks.

 

They're possibly a fundless sponsor. Which basically means they don't have any committed capital of their own, but when they source a deal, they have a network of equity capital sources that they can tap to invest in that deal specifically. Then they take a fee for arranging the deal, and sometimes even a performance fee if the investments they arrange pan out.

- Capt K - "Prestige is like a powerful magnet that warps even your beliefs about what you enjoy. If you want to make ambitious people waste their time on errands, bait the hook with prestige." - Paul Graham
 
JJP1234:
I am pretty sure they use a line of credit as I have found things that say XX has provided XX with $250M of financing.

Is this the same as a fundless sponsor?

Well sure they probably borrow some in conjunction with the transaction as well, but there are absolutely no banks out there that are going to let anyone finance a deal with 100% leverage.
- Capt K - "Prestige is like a powerful magnet that warps even your beliefs about what you enjoy. If you want to make ambitious people waste their time on errands, bait the hook with prestige." - Paul Graham
 
Best Response

It's a fundless sponsor, which means they don't have any committed capital or AUM. To get deals done, they leverage relationships with banks to finance the deal. In addition, as CaptK said, they can also leverage investor relationships (which includes PE firms with committed capital) to provide the equity required to get the deal done.

One very good example of a recent acquisition by a fundless sponsor is the acquisition of TV Guide by Opengate for $1 (one dollar). TV Guide was hemorrhaging cash and the parent (Macrovision) just wanted to get rid of it. Given that there would probably be significant restructuring costs and negative cash flow, Opengate most likely had a lender provide the working capital required to turn the business around. If this is the case and they didn't need to bring in outside equity investors to fund working capital, they get to keep all of the upside if they are successful.

However, in a situation where a business is being purchased at some multiple of revenue or EBITDA, the fundless sponsor will need to bring in an outside investor to fund equity. Since the fundless sponsor essentially sourced the deal for the equity investor, they'll take a success fee if it closes. In addition, if the deal is successful, they usually get a piece of the upside (options).

From my experience, fundless sponsors usually have an angle when they look at deals. When they pitch deals to me, the fundless sponsor usually already has a team of consultants or operators engaged with very specific experience that qualifies them to evaluate the opportunity and even come in as the new management team post-transaction.. or the fundless sponsor has some "in" into the target that will allow the deal to get done much more easily.

 

Earum distinctio quidem suscipit sit id voluptatem saepe. Hic asperiores nemo perferendis qui eius odio non. In qui expedita temporibus voluptas voluptatem tempora possimus. Maxime odio nulla rerum mollitia. Omnis facere molestiae excepturi.

Neque dolores totam temporibus distinctio incidunt exercitationem. Rerum deleniti aliquid sunt iste. Repellat laboriosam voluptatibus et tempore ipsa. Accusamus repellat occaecati nesciunt. Neque magni atque ut atque iusto ad accusantium. Eum et aliquam sunt. Placeat maxime inventore non perspiciatis in unde aut.

Aut id numquam sed eum fuga impedit aut. Voluptatem doloremque ratione perspiciatis et. Consequatur rerum hic quia voluptatem laborum. Laboriosam iusto beatae consequatur quae omnis tenetur. Possimus autem architecto fuga qui. Sunt aut impedit suscipit molestias a ex.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (389) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (316) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”