Publicly Listed PE Firms (EQT, BX, KKR) Comp

Do publicly listed PE firms have a different comp structure than their private counterparts? Do professionals get stocks as part of their compensation?

If a fund is giving up a portion of its management fees and performance fees to its shareholders, wouldn't the pie be smaller for the professionals actually working at those firms? 

 

Fair question - speaking from the junior level, I don’t think so. Most major PE firms have gone public and they all pay about the same for new associates.

I was given my exact comp figure (including bonuses) in my offer conversation and it is all-cash comp. Also just from the night they took us out after we got offers and speaking with the associates, it feels like they are much looser with spending policies than banking (e.g. buying crazy dinners, lunch is comped, you can Uber to/from the office without restriction, etc.). So feels very different than working at a publically traded bank.

 

Perhaps it's not very different at the junior levels since juniors are so cheap (vs. the senior folks). 

 
Most Helpful
Prospect in PE - Growth

Do publicly listed PE firms have a different comp structure than their private counterparts? Do professionals get stocks as part of their compensation?

If a fund is giving up a portion of its management fees and performance fees to its shareholders, wouldn't the pie be smaller for the professionals actually working at those firms? 

The unit economics of the carry pool are essentially halved by being publicly listed… but that need not apply to base+bonus which is entirely opex line item and is supported by the massive scale/mgmt fees these platforms are spinning off. Mgmt fees are split with shareholders AFTER opex/comp expense is paid out.

The dilution to AUM wealth creation for the investment staff really sits in the carry economics split with shareholders. In that case, you’re 100% correct. A $20bn fund at Blackstone/Apollo/KKR effectively has 50 cents on the dollar of Carry Dollars At Work vs. a Bain Capital or CD&R or Veritas.

I would note that many of the private firms have sold GP stakes to the likes of GS, BX and Dyal etc… so you also have some of that effect there as well, but not quite 50%-ish. For senior folks, their comp model is typically Base+Bonus+Carry+Stock. You can look up how much SBC a public PE player has, then take their investment staff FTE, assume only 20-30% of that is senior enough to get stock, and see what that shakes out to in terms of effective SBC per year. It’s probably $3-5m per person per year on average…. On top of $1-2m base, $1-3m bonus, $3-5m carry. So kind of doubles the carry piece, making up for the lost economics ceded to public shareholders.

 

Can’t you say basically the same thing at any private firm as well? Ie Orlando bravo is taking a massive chunk of the TB carry pool and obviously the founding partners at Bain are taking more carry then the MD who just got promoted.

So I’d argue at any firm ownership structure, you’re still losing economics to someone and it doesn’t really matter if that’s a public shareholder vs the managing partner / founders / etc

 

Yes but there are a few funds where the founders have left (e.g. Warburg) and the firm is still privately held, and you'd guess that remaining partners are more equal without a founder being there. 

 

Dolores nostrum deleniti voluptate maiores aut molestiae. Ut architecto et qui ex magni. Maiores at voluptatem fugit tenetur beatae voluptatem. Corporis in quia at dolores. Voluptatibus omnis sapiente ipsa est.

Quia numquam repellat reiciendis laboriosam nobis adipisci non. Omnis eveniet et ut. Laborum ut iure consequatur illo quia rerum quo.

Ullam facere similique libero quis consequuntur. Cupiditate dolor in doloremque aut aut sequi nihil. Distinctio sunt ab sit quod. Voluptas veniam beatae cum dolorem non enim veritatis.

Et voluptas beatae quis. Numquam et id modi vel. Non praesentium architecto consequatur sed. Qui quisquam aut debitis et. Debitis impedit eum sint voluptas nemo reprehenderit. Ipsam omnis animi dolorem debitis iure adipisci.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $266
  • 1st Year Associate (387) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (314) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
numi's picture
numi
98.8
10
Kenny_Powers_CFA's picture
Kenny_Powers_CFA
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”