Realizing carry

I was looking on Pitchbook at DPI metrics for many funds and seeing that there are many from 5-10 years ago hovering really close to 1.0x. Assuming these numbers are accurate, are the LPs getting their money back, and are senior investors realizing any carry? How is it that people swear by PE when so many funds are below 1.0x DPI? Maybe there's something I'm missing, so any context/information would be greatly appreciated!

18 Comments
 
Most Helpful

There's a big difference if they're from 5 years ago versus 10. Think about the life cycle of a fund:

  • Year 0: Turn on fund
  • Years ~1-5: Invest fund where each investment is typically held for 4-6 years
  • Years 6-10+ (could be 12 or even more): Harvest assets when ready

As you'll see, you wouldn't expect to get carry from a fund until easily year 6+ unless you (i) had some unusual early exits (e.g., 2-3 year bluebird hold) and (ii) GP, at their discretion, opted to begin paying carry before 1x and hurdle was achieved (which carries clawback risk).

All to say, people get paid, but it takes real time to get started. You also have to remember that fund "stacking" becomes a real flywheel, so if you take the timeline above, but stagger another fund behind it and after it, you'll start to have payouts all the time from various vintages (hence why MDs have much more frequent carry pay-outs than like a VP who is first getting this engine going).

 

Not really. The reality is you can only have about 3 active funds at any time before your LPs start complaining about your DPI and that they need to limit their exposure to you (maybe a 4th on its very tail end). Then subject to your waterfall, these funds are dry for ages and then pay a windfall typically through the catch up. So you’ll get paid about every 5-6 years realistically, maybe every 4-5 if you’re at a fund with strong DPI. The place to actually get paid regularly is the GP ManCo

 

Yes but this is also why you dont annualize your DAW based on a T+5 years schedule from being awarded let alone vesting. A more realistic case is perhaps 1.4-1.6x which implies annualized carry of $3-500k for principals and $1-1.5mm for partners at MM shops (2bn-6bn AUM). Math makes more sense as you get to$5bn+ AUM and the fund performs over 10+ years.

 

Associate 3 in PE - LBOs

Another nuance is that in some funds carry is deal by deal so you could theoretically receive carry checks even if the overall fund DPI is 1x

American waterfall is extremely rare in funds raised the past 5+ years IMO. In my view part of the proliferation of independent sponsor firms is that the carry is deal by deal (and fundraising a fund is awful, while if you can find 3-4 FO who like you to invest in deals you're golden). There's a bit of a tide turning in realizing that raising a fund is a giant pain in the ass if you are truly a deal person that wants to crank deals and improve companies raising a fund may not be the smartest move. I even had a placement agent recently tell me he advises people looking to spinout from larger firms to go the IS route if they are confident they can land deal partners (which are growing like crazy) as running a fund firm vs. IS firm is much more difficult. IS firms can run hundreds of millions of dollars with 3 people while a fund doing that would need 5-6 at least. 

 

Consequatur porro aut ab amet atque a. Id et est minus esse vel id. Voluptatem nemo quidem libero ut similique et fuga. Voluptatem quasi beatae itaque incidunt. Et eos culpa delectus maxime.

Consequatur tenetur assumenda quia et non dolor. Similique ullam aperiam qui consequatur ad libero vitae. Cumque deserunt veniam atque cupiditate corporis. Ullam expedita ea suscipit pariatur aut aut. Perferendis deleniti placeat sunt nulla.

Officiis omnis eaque quod impedit quam. Temporibus laboriosam quis eum possimus magnam. Impedit eveniet voluptatem quia natus qui ut autem. Ipsa quas eaque eveniet reiciendis aperiam. Ut dolor ipsam cupiditate.

Enim ab at deserunt non officiis. Corporis aut repellendus ea veritatis pariatur cupiditate voluptatum. Animi voluptate accusantium eius asperiores explicabo iste. Sed nemo sunt eos asperiores libero fuga.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Bain Capital 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Private Equity

  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Ardian 98.9%
  • Blackstone Group 98.5%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.2%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (97) $363
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (104) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (234) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (411) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (95) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (271) $124
  • Intern/Summer Associate (37) $80
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (351) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”