Shower Thoughts - Why EBITDA Margin Matters

In a mature industry, all else being equal, investors generally use forward EV/EBITDA to value a TargetCo, so the price tag is tied to the absolute dollar amount of EBITDA. Leverage aside, and assuming no multiple expansion / contraction, your return is dependent on how much the forward EBITDA can increase from entry to exit.

From investors' POV, depending on the firm / fund, there may be a min. requirement for EBITDA margin when screening through potential investment opportunities. Why place such a huge emphasis on EBITDA margin of the target companies when its the absolute dollar amount of EBITDA that should matter? Theoretically speaking, would you prefer Company A that has high EBITDA margin but slow top line growth, or Company B that has high top line growth but low EBITDA margin, assuming their absolute dollar amount of EBITDA is the same?

 

Companies that have a high, sustainable competitive moat will have pricing power combined with significant barriers to entry which will preclude new entrants. That results in high margins. Sustained high margins in a mature industry signals that the Company is doing something that is valued by their customers and hard for others to replicate. Examples include traditional CPG, branded consumer product companies (Apple, Coca Cola, etc.). This is also why Buffett likes those type of consumer businesses so much - doesn’t matter what new technology comes out in next 100 years - there is and only will be one Coca Cola. 

 
Most Helpful

There's so many other considerations that go into an investment and there's so much deal-specific context, etc. High margins make for a nice checkmark for people skimming company financials to gauge cash generation. Even in your example, it's a really hard question to answer without more info.

Assuming most things equal, like they operate in the same industry, I would assume that Company B is a newer entrant that's rapidly gaining share, and would expect margins to come up closer to Company A over the hold period (assuming they're not gonna continue to give up pricing and erode GP contribution, etc), resulting in higher absolute EBITDA growth. If you're asking about two companies with equivalent EBITDA growth but different margin characteristics...then I'd assume they're either in different industries, Company B is just lazier (read: opportunity to trim fat), or maybe Company A is aggressive AF in cap. labor spend. 

These are all overly simplified takes but overall I agree that focus on margin is way too shallow without proper context. 

 

Arguably margin doesn’t matter so much as ROIC or FCF yield on investment. Ultimately the former is a measure of business efficiency and the latter a measure of price-based return quality. 

 

EBITDA is code for bullshit earnings. Gimme dat FCF all day baby. Can't pay people in adjustments. 

"The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly" - Robert A. Wilson | "If you don't have any enemies in life you have never stood up for anything" - Winston Churchill | "It's a testament to the sheer belligerence of the profession that people would rather argue about the 'risk-adjusted returns' of using inferior tooth cleaning methods." - kellycriterion
 

This is something that has bugged me for a while too. Oftentimes, with higher margin industries, they tend to not be able to grow revenues as fast either (i.e. niche industry). I guess margins matter more when you're comparing two very similar companies which theoretically should be able to grow revenue at similar rates with similar level of difficulty, but one of them just has a better cost structure in order to retain more of that revenue in the form of EBITDA

 

Mollitia eum doloremque magni aut odio soluta facere quas. Numquam voluptatem et quae laudantium. Ad sed esse deleniti quia. Reiciendis enim corporis ipsam voluptas id quas porro ut. Quis ut eos dolores totam consequuntur molestias excepturi.

Consequatur optio eos aut. Eos debitis provident rerum dolorem quas dolorem eius. Aut voluptas laudantium ipsum eveniet voluptatem debitis quo ipsum. Veritatis optio et distinctio.

Nisi molestias quidem distinctio qui. Enim impedit blanditiis debitis reprehenderit. Aliquam officia quia eos illum ullam hic. Et iure voluptatem enim.

Career Advancement Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 99.0%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.4%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Blackstone Group 98.9%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.4%
  • Ardian 97.9%
  • Bain Capital 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

May 2024 Private Equity

  • The Riverside Company 99.5%
  • Bain Capital 99.0%
  • Blackstone Group 98.4%
  • Warburg Pincus 97.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

May 2024 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (22) $569
  • Vice President (92) $362
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (91) $281
  • 2nd Year Associate (206) $268
  • 1st Year Associate (388) $229
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (29) $154
  • 2nd Year Analyst (83) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (246) $122
  • Intern/Summer Associate (32) $82
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (315) $59
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.8
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”