Size of Deals on Resume for PE Recruiting

I work in FIG at an EB and although I feel that I am gathering valuable experience, most of my deals would be described as small ($50M - $500M) with only 1-2 surpassing $1B.

Would this be looked upon poorly when recruiting for PE? Part of it is a function of the industry (i.e. there isn't a ton of money to put to work in FIG), but would like to hear others' opine on this.

Thanks

16 Comments
 

size of deal matters in a sense that it provides a slightly better headline on your resume, but when it comes down to it, actual deal experience (ie. what you contributed and learned from the transaction) is a lot more important than just the headline. Keep in mind that a lot of analysts (especially in coverage groups) will not have any deal experience when recruiting for PE so I would not worry about this.

 
Best Response

Much better to discuss any deal, than just say you worked on a "big deal." Honestly, a lot of the times a big deal is done, much of it is already done on the corporate side anyway. Much better to have really been in the weeds on a $200m deal with tons of diligence, investment considerations, tactics and crazy shit than to have a $10B deal on your resume and all you've done is a DCF, spread some comps and some firepower analysis.

 

I don't get this notion that IBD analysts can differentiate themselves by generating revenue. I see this mentioned from time to time and the only way it seems possible is if the analyst is extremely well-connected (i.e. comes from money).

OP, quality of experience is what matters. PE firms care more about the $50mm M&A deal on your resume than they do the Facebook IPO you worked on. I know a kid at a mid-tier bulge bracket who got into a megafund with a convert deal as the only completed transaction on his resume. Granted, he did go to an Ivy, is smart, likely interviewed well and had the group head pulling for him. But once he got his foot in the door, he did his thing and impressed.

 

I meant "well connected enough to bring in a deal." Most analysts are fresh out of college, don't know shit and are in no position to offer advice to a seasoned CEO. Further, some analysts are in coverage groups for industries that require extensive study to fully understand, and it is highly likely that the analyst did not major in that area of study in college. Picture a 22-year old who majored in econ trying to talk shop with an MD and PhD who's CEO of a diagnostics company.

If I'm missing something that is applicable to the average analyst, please enlighten me. Otherwise, you do not have this non-target state school finance major convinced.

 

Well, I came from a non-target state school, was a physics-engineering major and had mediocre grades. However, after leaving the Corps I landed in a family office in HKG. Spent three years evaluating technologies for investment and was eventually asked by the Chairman to start sitting on portco boards. Since then, I completed my MBA at a top ten school (globally) and a few minor deals (USD 2 to 30 M range) on my own and was asked to join a MM PE firm and set up their Asia office.

The point is you don't have to be a seasoned veteran to pull off a deal, just determined, focused and lucky every once in a while. Universities are packed with good ideas that languish primarily because the students generally do not take risks.

I agree most college grads don't know anything and wouldn't be able to contribute to the firm (hence my original post). However, I have on rare occasion met a few that are contributors. Average, definitely not..

 

No first years will have any real deal-related experience when it's time for PE interviews

If they do, then I'd immediately wonder what the fuck is wrong with their group/bank that has them staffing a first-year with absolutely no experience (and is, quite frankly, deadweight for the first 6 months or so of their stint) to play any type of important role on a revenue-making transaction

This is for BB's, btw. Boutiques... maybe

 

Repellat consectetur dolores impedit rerum. Magnam molestias velit quod. Sit iusto praesentium voluptatem voluptatem quo harum. Nihil iure est quaerat iusto. Quibusdam numquam eaque voluptatem cupiditate aspernatur.

Blanditiis voluptas placeat asperiores consectetur maxime veritatis. Ipsa exercitationem consequuntur deleniti doloremque quas cum. Placeat est cupiditate rem eius consequuntur aperiam quos.

Molestias perferendis et et veritatis omnis. Consequatur reiciendis numquam dolorem unde. Quo dolor temporibus dolores id enim. Ipsa illo at quidem et. Est aut iste explicabo culpa asperiores qui et. Odio id possimus perspiciatis eveniet exercitationem.

Career Advancement Opportunities

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • The Riverside Company 99.3%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.9%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.5%
  • Vista Equity Partners 98.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Blackstone Group 99.6%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Ardian 98.5%
  • Warburg Pincus 98.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Bain Capital 99.6%
  • Blackstone Group 99.3%
  • The Riverside Company 98.9%
  • Starwood Capital Group 98.5%
  • KKR (Kohlberg Kravis Roberts) 98.1%

Total Avg Compensation

October 2026 Private Equity

  • Principal (9) $653
  • Director/MD (24) $547
  • Vice President (100) $364
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (106) $280
  • 2nd Year Associate (236) $272
  • 1st Year Associate (414) $231
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (33) $157
  • 2nd Year Analyst (97) $134
  • 1st Year Analyst (273) $126
  • Intern/Summer Associate (40) $79
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (357) $61
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”