What did your 1st and 2nd review look like, good and bad?
Just curious what others reviews looked like, pros and cons.
Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
| +44 | Future of PE | 8 | 1h |
| +25 | Hardest time I have ever seen to be a GP | 3 | 3d |
| +20 | How to Get on Career Track / Stay Post ASO years | 6 | 1d |
| +19 | Weighing exit from LMM PC/PE | 4 | 1d |
| +18 | Healthcare PE | 7 | 8h |
| +15 | KKR comp for Principal | 20 | 8h |
| +11 | Reality of the move from LMM to MM | 2 | 6d |
| +9 | LMM/MM PE London | 5 | 1d |
| +9 | PE Behaviorals Feedback | 1 | 6d |
| +9 | MBA and Private Equity | 3 | 2d |
Career Resources
bump
Are you asking what the first year annual review and second year annual review looked like? Or just if we have had multiple reviews like a mid year and final year review, what were they like?
Just had my mid year and it was very good. Was surprised/relieved, was so in my head about it
Same situation. Had no idea how it would go but was pleasantly surprised to get only positive feedback all around. It can be easy to get into your head and assume they have higher expectations of you than they really do.
Autem voluptas cum ea. Optio doloremque unde accusamus non animi.
Qui voluptatem ab laboriosam est accusamus sapiente. Dolores quia molestiae dolor quas. Porro porro odit reprehenderit consectetur quam recusandae et sint. Eos voluptas voluptatum eveniet nihil adipisci adipisci voluptatem. Dolorem nobis nihil qui adipisci illum recusandae qui.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...