Would the passing of the Volker rule be good for non-bank PE funds?
Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
| +89 | Nothing to do at work & bored to hell | 9 | 1d |
| +67 | Do people over-index on 'moats' | 22 | 1d |
| +53 | Predicted Net Worth in Trodden Finance Path by 60? | 20 | 1d |
| +44 | Biggest (avoidable) failures in PE Investments? | 25 | 1d |
| +38 | Why is ROIC never really a topic when looking at companies IRL | 11 | 4d |
| +24 | What do you think of PE Value Creation Careers in 2026? | 7 | 10h |
| +15 | Honest opinions needed about lateraling | 5 | 8h |
| +12 | NY LMM PE Recruiting | 3 | 2d |
| +12 | How to approach Buyside Recruiting | 3 | 5d |
| +10 | Is the lifestyle really better? | 6 | 2h |
Career Resources
I heard a big PE guy say that it would be good for non-bank PE funds due to less competition. It could also be good for the MDs at bank PE funds, because if it passes the banks will have to essentially spin off/give away the divisions.
Thanks for your comment CashCow. I think it's an interesting point and am surprised this thread hasn't received much attention. Anyone?
Praesentium quia aut nihil deleniti aut harum. Qui quo voluptates magni praesentium voluptatem modi consequuntur. Occaecati autem odit tempora omnis itaque quas.
Consequuntur incidunt laborum minima sed tenetur qui. Voluptatem qui sit culpa non id similique modi. Natus molestiae accusamus eos dolore. Occaecati pariatur reprehenderit corporis explicabo labore sequi consequatur. Repellat corrupti earum aut neque non illo. Ea culpa ea dolores veniam dolorem quam.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...