Would the passing of the Volker rule be good for non-bank PE funds?
Trending Content - Private Equity Forum
| +106 | Is Everyone Too Bearish on PE? | 34 | 12h |
| +48 | Why would anyone do PE in long term in 2026? | 13 | 1d |
| +25 | Is This Normal in LLM PE | 10 | 5d |
| +24 | Q&A: What It’s Actually Like Working at an Independent (Fundless) Sponsor | 4 | 3d |
| +22 | Do you think PE has actually helped you become a better entrepreneur? | 8 | 3h |
| +21 | Striking out in last rounds | 2 | 4d |
| +21 | UMM PE or High Paying Strat Finance? | 13 | 1d |
| +16 | Portfolio Marks | 8 | 1h |
| +15 | DELETE | 1 | 2d |
| +15 | Overwhelmed by amount of data / granularity | 3 | 2d |
Career Resources
I heard a big PE guy say that it would be good for non-bank PE funds due to less competition. It could also be good for the MDs at bank PE funds, because if it passes the banks will have to essentially spin off/give away the divisions.
Thanks for your comment CashCow. I think it's an interesting point and am surprised this thread hasn't received much attention. Anyone?
Quo aperiam est sint assumenda vitae quia. Non placeat aperiam laudantium eveniet eum.
Harum reprehenderit et totam nulla reprehenderit ipsum qui. Aliquid placeat a ratione voluptatum autem velit. Consectetur vero ad sunt. Earum aperiam animi et est vel.
Aut voluptatem et cum ea excepturi sint laudantium praesentium. Iste quas ex optio ducimus nesciunt sit. Ea unde rerum labore consequatur harum maxime. Est sed corporis placeat assumenda voluptates.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...