Basic Question on Special Servicing. Who Drives the Ship?

Apologies for the basic question. I’ve identified a number of deals that are in special servicing, and want to reach out to key decision makers on a possible sale. Who drives the ship/process here? I think it’s the special servicer but not sure if it’s the senior? Thanks in advance 

 

In the context of special servicing, the key decision makers are typically the special servicers. They are responsible for managing the process and making decisions regarding the sale of assets. If you are looking to reach out about a possible sale, the special servicer would be the appropriate point of contact.

For more detailed discussions and insights, you might want to check out the relevant threads on Wall Street Oasis, such as the one titled "Buying REO from Special Servicers."

Sources: SENIOR BANKERS: Whale hunting vs. volume work at the senior level, https://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forum/trading/qa-senior-financial-services-executive-fixed-income-equities?customgpt=1, Q&A - Commercial Banking Credit Risk SVP in Southeast USA, "We don't hire VPs", Lazard v. Morgan Stanley Post-MBA

I'm an AI bot trained on the most helpful WSO content across 17+ years.
 

I hope you mean a note sale at or close to par prior to a F/C and not trying to convince a special to sell you a REO property for 20-30% of the prior debt like you’re doing them a solid.

DCH (if there is one) drives the bus if they haven’t been appraised out of control, and SS takes action on the resolution strategy. For non-DCH deals, SS will determine the path forward for the asset.

When they are ready to sell, they likely want to broadly market the deal to show they have achieved the highest return to bondholders with the final offer selected. There are exceptions but rare.

 

The deal would go to special and they would be in control on behalf of the bondholders. Bondholders have differing levels of rights depending on the deal and their risk. As Tranche mentioned, if there's a DCH, they're driving 

As Tranche also mentioned, do not think any level of proactivity gets you ahead ESPECIALLY if you are approaching thinking you could buy below par. Their job is to maximize the pie that's returned to bondholders. I really don't have much understanding on what all goes on but I imagine it's essentially a group of creditors working to ensure they at least get theirs back on a company that goes belly up. Even if you could somehow land a sweetheart deal, I'm not sure you'd want to go through with it if its accompanied by legal implications or introductions to fairly agitated bondholders should it be successful. 

It seems like you could reach out though to work to ensure your group is thought of when/if they run a sale process. Very interested in anyone else's experience or input on this post

 

We buy a lot of deals from the special. Special facilitates the conversation, B piece is first loss so they drive the decisions. Unless you can sweet talk an A/B note you are paying par and often times have to participate in a marketed process.

 
Most Helpful

I know way more about this than I reasonably should due to the events of these past two years. We are the b-piece holder in a Freddie Mac K-series trust, and we have driven the bus on several loan resolutions during the past two years. Our actions are carried out by the special servicer assigned by the trust, and both our authority and the special's authority is set forth in a 500-page document called a pooling and servicing agreement. The pooling and servicing also sets forth the fees earned by the servicers.

To the person above who said that the special servicer gets paid by how long the deal is in SS and acts accordingly, that jives with our experience working with one SS. We actually terminated that SS on behalf of the trust (DCH can typically do that) and brought in a new servicer who has been fantastic. So the b-piece holder definitely has ultimate control subject to the framework of the pooling and servicing.

To resolve a defaulted loan, a DCH can do a bunch of different things - buy the note out of the trust and foreclose separately, acquire the property and assume the loan via a receiver sale (which we elected to do), direct the SS to sell the property, among many other things. Generally, the fees are typically minimized by buying the note out of the trust and foreclosing directly, but we wanted the debt because it was sub 5% all-in and fixed, not to mention that a special servicer is typically going to be very, very forgiving with any requested loan mods if you're coming in as a white knight and making an event of default go away. However, you lose your DCH status on those certain loans when assuming and modifying, and control in the event of default is ceded to the next sequential certificateholder. Because if not, there would be a huge conflict of interest in event of default.

A Freddie K deal is just one example out of many, but once you understand these structures, they become somewhat intuitive. But it definitely took me a while to get comfortable with how this works.

 

Veritatis ad minus laborum voluptatem maiores. Ipsam nisi et libero enim vitae eum. Assumenda dolor nihil architecto aut eveniet. Pariatur dignissimos soluta quo quas.

Harum velit corporis animi omnis dolorem. Assumenda laudantium vel provident rerum et mollitia. Quo velit dolor aut ut voluptatibus ut et. Aut delectus accusantium qui quasi sit officiis.

Ut ut consequatur ut ut odit blanditiis dolor. Consequatur earum minus quae sed nobis et suscipit. Nemo ut ad amet a vel pariatur quos. Ut architecto ut magnam et fuga. Aliquid sed sed recusandae quis illum laudantium quam optio.

Et quas consequatur quos voluptatem commodi voluptatem earum. Ipsa molestias iusto et accusantium delectus.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2024 Investment Banking

  • Perella Weinberg Partners 26 99.5%
  • Harris Williams & Co. 28 98.9%
  • Jefferies & Company No 98.4%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.9%
  • JPMorgan Chase 04 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 19 99.5%
  • JPMorgan Chase 11 98.9%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.4%
  • William Blair 03 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.5%
  • Perella Weinberg Partners 13 98.9%
  • Jefferies & Company 01 98.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 06 97.9%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (23) $378
  • Associates (104) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (15) $179
  • 2nd Year Analyst (73) $169
  • Intern/Summer Associate (34) $167
  • 1st Year Analyst (222) $158
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (161) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
4
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
5
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
9
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”