Bridge Lender Loan Sizing/Constraints

For all of the bridge lenders out there, what are some of the ways that you size your loans on value-add deals?

For core/stabilized assets, lenders seem to usually just size based off of the debt yield, using LTV and DSCR as secondary checks - pretty straightforward.

But for a value-add/transitional deal, are there any standard sizing metrics/constraints? Do you mainly just size to a certain LTC on total project costs (acq. + capex/TI/LCs)? Are you underwriting the asset to stabilization and applying an LTV? Are you sizing off of in-place NOI and then offering good news future funding contingent upon some benchmark that you define (i.e. % leased, min. debt yield etc.)

I know each bridge deal structure is inherently unique and dependent on the asset class, sponsor, location etc. I am just trying to get a feel if you guys have any quick back of the envelope methods that you use to quickly size a loan when you have a deal cross your desk. Thanks in advance for any feedback.

3 Comments
 

Size off stabilized, not in-place (so higher proceeds) but you'll pay for it in spread and structure (if you want non-recourse). This is assuming your in-place debt yield would still be something reasonable like 4%. Banks will give you a lower spread for around the same proceeds but there will likely be a recourse component. This info is for transitional value-add plays not new construction.

 
Best Response

Maxime aut alias dolore animi omnis ex architecto. Ipsam quae officiis cumque magnam nemo voluptatum. Ullam nihil quia voluptas aut eum quam libero. Fugiat ut dolorem amet enim laboriosam eius.

Voluptatibus vero recusandae id hic in necessitatibus aut. Est eveniet quibusdam delectus et qui ut assumenda. Non accusantium aperiam et praesentium. Sit repudiandae voluptatem aut consectetur porro. Magni at id quis qui harum.

Accusantium eius optio architecto velit cupiditate. Et velit asperiores est animi neque optio in enim. Iste doloribus cupiditate qui iste quas quia laborum laborum.

Corporis aliquam maxime iusto nihil. Autem consequatur aut architecto facilis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.7%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

July 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (46) $258
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (80) $150
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (73) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”